How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
A -> ATLEE...(click to open)
ATLEE, Victoria
Agarwal, Swapnil
Alfonso-Royals, Angelica
Alfonso-Royals, Uscis
Alvarado, Genesis
Atherton, Lisa
F -> Feinberg...(click to open)
Feinberg, Sarah
Fernandes., Victor
Flores, Victorina
Fornaro, Robert
W -> Watson...(click to open)
Watson, Patricia
Wesch, Christopher
Williams, Vantray
Williams, Victor
Wolfe, Veronica
|
Texas, June 18, 2025 ⚖ Case 3:2025cv00188 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, case 3:2025cv00188 involves Vantray Williams suing Johnna Montalvo and Matagorda County. Filed on June 18, 2025, this case addresses issues related to Prisoner: Civil Rights based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights. The case is presided over by Judge Jeffrey V Brown, with Referring Judge Andrew M Edison also involved. No jury trial has been requested. More Information about >>> ✅ Vantray Williams, ✅ Johnna Montalvo … | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
VICTORIA ATLEE and BUSRA SIRCA
More Information |
Director, USCIS Angelica Alfonso-Royals and ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, Connie Nolan |
| [Case # 2025cv02860], [Filed: June 19, 2025] [ Other Immigration Actions§28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus ⚖ ] ✅ USCIS Angelica Alfonso-Royals, ✅ ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, ✅ Connie Nolan >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, June 19, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00692 Within the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Victor Pineda brings forward a case against State Farm Lloyds in Case Number case 5:2025cv00692. Initiated on June 19, 2025, this legal matter pertains to an Insurance issue based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract. It's important to mention that Plaintiff has requested a jury for this case. More Information about >>> ✅ Victor Pineda … | |
|
Texas, June 23, 2025 ⚖ Case 1:2025cv00966 In case 1:2025cv00966, VISION SPHERE LABS, LLC takes legal action against AIRTIES, INC. at the US District Court for the Western District of Texas. Filed on June 23, 2025, this case revolves around a Patent issue under 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement. It's notable that Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case. | |
|
Texas, June 24, 2025 ⚖ Case 3:2025cv01626 The legal proceedings in case 3:2025cv01626 at US District Court for the Northern District of Texas involve VISION SPHERE LABS, LLC and BIGLEAF NETWORKS, INC. Filed on June 24, 2025, this case focuses on Property Rights: Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement. Judge Jane J Boyle is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, June 23, 2025 ⚖ Case 2:2025cv00655 In Case Number case 2:2025cv00655, Vision Sphere Labs, LLC takes legal action against Fortinet, Inc. in the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. Filed on June 23, 2025, this case involves an Patent matter under 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement. Notably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case. | |
|
Texas, June 23, 2025 ⚖ Case 1:2025cv00967 In Case Number case 1:2025cv00967, Velos Media, LLC takes legal action against ByteDance Ltd, ByteDance Inc., ByteDance Technology Ltd., TikTok Ltd., TikTok PTE. Ltd. and TikTok Inc. in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas. Filed on June 23, 2025, this case involves an Patent matter under 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement. Notably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case. | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
VICTOR H. LUEVANO
More Information |
Wells Fargo Financial Texas, Inc. |
| [Case # 2025cv00230], [Filed: June 25, 2025] [ Real Property: Foreclosure§28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement ⚖ ] ✅ Wells Fargo Financial Texas >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, June 26, 2025 ⚖ Case 4:2025cv02966 In Case Number case 4:2025cv02966, Valeria Hernandez takes legal action against Ability Recovery Services LLC, Wakefield & Associates, Inc., Experian Information Solutions Inc., Transunion, LLC and Wakefield & Associates, LLC in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Filed on June 26, 2025, this case involves an Consumer Credit matter under 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act. Notably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case. More Information about >>> ✅ Valeria Hernandez … | |
|
Texas, June 27, 2025 ⚖ Case 3:2025cv01659 In case 3:2025cv01659 within US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, VDPP LLC brings a case against Revo America Corporation. Filed on June 27, 2025, this legal matter relates to Property Rights: Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. The presiding judge is Sam A Lindsay, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, June 30, 2025 ⚖ Case 3:2025cv00238 In a legal showdown that reverberates with intensity, the corridors of the US District Court for the Western District of Texas echo with the clash between Virginia Medrano and Genesis Alvarado and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and John or Jane DOE. Dated June 30, 2025, this legal saga, identified by docket number case 3:2025cv00238, thrusts into the spotlight with a passionate fervor. The battleground? A tumultuous arena of contractual conflicts encapsulated under the umbrella of "Civil Rights: Other" as per 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act. However, amidst this legal storm, what ignites the flames of anticipation is Plaintiff's adamant insistence on a jury trial. It's a bold, unyielding stance, signaling a zealous yearning for resolution through the judgment of peers in this emotionally charged confrontation. More Information about >>> ✅ Virginia Medrano, ✅ Genesis Alvarado … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Vincent Jerome Thompson
More Information |
USA |
| [Case # 2025cv01713], [Filed: June 30, 2025] [ Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence§28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence ⚖ ] [Judge: Ed Kinkeade] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, July 03, 2025 ⚖ Case 4:2025cv00712 In case 4:2025cv00712, Vijaya Lakshmi Madasu initiates legal action against Carrick's Auto at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The case was filed on July 03, 2025 and involves matters related to Other Fraud under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud. Jeremy D Kernodle presides over the case, and Referring Judge John D Love is also involved. There has been no request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Vijaya Lakshmi Madasu … | |
|
Texas, July 03, 2025 ⚖ Case 2:2025cv00681 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 2:2025cv00681, Virtual Creative Artists, LLC files a suit against Lumber Liquidators, Inc. The filing date was July 03, 2025, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Rodney Gilstrap. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 03, 2025 ⚖ Case 3:2025cv01743 At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2025cv01743 entails Vanessa Rosales and Fiesta Mart LLC, d/b/a Fiesta Mart #29. The filing date is July 03, 2025, and this case deals with Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury as per 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal. Judge Sidney A Fitzwater is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Vanessa Rosales … | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
Victorina Flores
More Information |
Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company |
| [Case # 2025cv03153], [Filed: July 07, 2025] [ Insurance§28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal ⚖ ] [jury demanded by Both] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, July 07, 2025 ⚖ Case 4:2025cv03150 Victor Williams initiates legal proceedings (case 4:2025cv03150) against Miguel Angel Torres Ortiz and CB Freight Inc at the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The case, filed on July 07, 2025, pertains to Motor Vehicle under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.). Notably, Defendant has demanded a jury for this matter. More Information about >>> ✅ Victor Williams, ✅ Miguel Angel Torres Ortiz … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Vicente Alejandro Perez-Molina
More Information |
USA |
| [Case # 2025cv00114], [Filed: July 07, 2025] [ Prisoner Pet/Other: Mandamus & Other§Civil Miscellaneous Case ⚖ ] [Judge: Reed C O'Connor] >>> More Information |
|
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Vivek Shah
More Information |
Swapnil Agarwal |
| [Case # 2025cv01761], [Filed: July 07, 2025] [ Other Statutes: Arbitration§9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award ⚖ ] [Judge: Sam A Lindsay] ✅ Swapnil Agarwal >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, July 09, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00098 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 5:2025cv00098, Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC files a suit against OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. The filing date was July 09, 2025, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Robert W Schroeder. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 09, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00099 The legal proceedings in case 5:2025cv00099 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC and Acer Inc. Filed on July 09, 2025, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Robert W Schroeder is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 09, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00100 In case 5:2025cv00100 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC brings a case against ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. Filed on July 09, 2025, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. The presiding judge is Robert W Schroeder, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 09, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00101 The legal proceedings in case 5:2025cv00101 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC and Cisco Systems, Inc. Filed on July 09, 2025, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Robert W Schroeder is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 09, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00103 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 5:2025cv00103, Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC files a suit against D-Link Corporation. The filing date was July 09, 2025, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Robert W Schroeder. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 09, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00104 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 5:2025cv00104, Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC files a suit against HP Inc. The filing date was July 09, 2025, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Robert W Schroeder. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 09, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00105 The legal proceedings in case 5:2025cv00105 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Aruba Networks, LLC. Filed on July 09, 2025, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Robert W Schroeder is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 09, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00106 The legal proceedings in case 5:2025cv00106 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC and Juniper Networks, Inc. Filed on July 09, 2025, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Robert W Schroeder is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 09, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00107 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 5:2025cv00107, Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC files a suit against Lenovo Group Limited, Lenovo PC HK Limited, Motorola Mobile Communication Technology Ltd. and Motorola (Wuhan) Mobility Technologies Communication Company Limited. The filing date was July 09, 2025, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Robert W Schroeder. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 09, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00108 At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 5:2025cv00108 involves Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC and LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. Filed on July 09, 2025, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Robert W Schroeder is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 09, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00109 Within the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC brings forward a case against TP-Link Corporation PTE. Ltd., TP-Link Corporation Ltd., Lianzhou Technologies Co., Ltd. and Lianyue (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. in Case Number case 5:2025cv00109. Initiated on July 09, 2025, this legal matter pertains to an Patent issue based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. It's important to mention that Plaintiff has requested a jury for this case. | |
|
Texas, July 10, 2025 ⚖ Case 3:2025cv01816 In case 3:2025cv01816 within US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Vladimir Gusinsky brings a case against Christopher P. Reynolds, David Cush, David J. Grissen, David P. Hess, Douglas H. Brooks, Gregg A. Saretsky, Lisa M. Atherton, Patricia A. Watson, Pierre R. Breber, Rakesh Gangwal, Robert E. Jordan, Robert L. Fornaro, Sarah Feinberg, Eduardo F. Conrado, El. Filed on July 10, 2025, this legal matter relates to Contract: Other Contract as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty. The presiding judge is Ed Kinkeade, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Vladimir Gusinsky, ✅ Christopher P. Reynolds, ✅ David Cush, ✅ David J. Grissen, ✅ David P. Hess, ✅ Douglas H. Brooks, ✅ Gregg A. Saretsky, ✅ Lisa M. Atherton, ✅ Patricia A. Watson, ✅ Pierre R. Breber, ✅ Rakesh Gangwal, ✅ Robert E. Jordan, ✅ Robert L. Fornaro, ✅ Sarah Feinberg, ✅ Eduardo F. Conrado … | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
Veronica Sarahi Guevara Mosqueda
More Information |
Kristi Noem, Angelica Alfonso-Royals, Houston Field Office and District Director Ricky Hamilton |
| [Case # 2025cv03212], [Filed: July 10, 2025] [ Other Immigration Actions§28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus ⚖ ] ✅ Kristi Noem, ✅ Angelica Alfonso-Royals, ✅ Houston Field Office >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, July 11, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00111 Initiated as Case Number case 5:2025cv00111, Veronica Banks files a lawsuit against Equifax Information Services LLC at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Filed on July 11, 2025, this case revolves around Consumer Credit under 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act. Judge James Boone Baxter presides over the case, and Referring Judge Rodney Gilstrap is also part of the proceedings. It's essential to note that Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case. More Information about >>> ✅ Veronica Banks … | |
|
Texas, July 11, 2025 ⚖ Case 2:2025cv00704 Initiated in case 2:2025cv00704, VIDEOLABS, INC. brings forth legal action against Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd. at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Filed on July 11, 2025, this case pertains to Patent grounded in 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding Judge Rodney Gilstrap oversees the proceedings, with Referring Judge Roy S Payne involved. It's notable that Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case. | |
|
Texas, July 11, 2025 ⚖ Case 2:2025cv00706 In Case Number case 2:2025cv00706, VALUE8 CO., LTD. takes legal action against Ford Motor Company in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Filed on July 11, 2025, this case involves an Patent matter under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Notably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case. | |
|
Texas, July 11, 2025 ⚖ Case 7:2025cv00309 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 7:2025cv00309, VDPP, LLC files a suit against VTech Communications, Inc. The filing date was July 11, 2025, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge David Counts. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 11, 2025 ⚖ Case 2:2025cv00159 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Vitel Communications Corporation and C.W.T. Solutions L.L.C. are involved in case 2:2025cv00159. Filed on July 11, 2025, this legal matter focuses on Contract: Miller Act under 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act. Judge Matthew J Kacsmaryk is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. | |
|
Texas, August 12, 2025 ⚖ Case 4:2025cv00865 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the case 4:2025cv00865 involves Vista Bank and Calcot, Ltd. Filed on August 12, 2025, this case pertains to Torts/Pers Prop: Other Personal Property Damage under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion. Presiding over this matter is Judge Mark Pittman. There is no demand for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, August 13, 2025 ⚖ Case 5:2025cv00992 In case 5:2025cv00992, Victor Fernandes, Sr., Individually, And on Behalf of the Estate of Victor Fernandes takes legal action against Christopher Wesch at the US District Court for the Western District of Texas. Filed on August 13, 2025, this case revolves around a Civil Rights: Other issue under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act. It's notable that Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case. More Information about >>> ✅ Victor Fernandes., ✅ Christopher Wesch … | |
|
Texas, August 13, 2025 ⚖ Case 3:2025cv02180 In case 3:2025cv02180 within US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Victoria Osborn and Tara Dailey brings a case against Best Block LLC. Filed on August 13, 2025, this legal matter relates to Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury. The presiding judge is David C Godbey, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Victoria Osborn, ✅ Tara Dailey … | |
|
Texas, August 13, 2025 ⚖ Case 3:2025cv02186 In case 3:2025cv02186 within US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Veronica Wolfe brings a case against AmDocs Inc, The Investment Committee of AmDocs, Inc. and John Does 1-10. Filed on August 13, 2025, this legal matter relates to Labor: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) as per 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A. The presiding judge is Ed Kinkeade, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Veronica Wolfe … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all