How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, January 26, 2015 ⚖ Case 2:2015cv00083/157075 The legal proceedings in case 2:2015cv00083/157075 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve IOdapt, LLC and Asus Computer International Corporation. Filed on January 26, 2015, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Rodney Gilstrap, Roy S. Payne is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 26, 2015 ⚖ Case 7:2015cv00040/1237439 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 7:2015cv00040/1237439 entails Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. The filing date is January 26, 2015, and this case deals with Other Statutory Actions as per 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, January 26, 2015 ⚖ Case 7:2015cv00039/1237406 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 7:2015cv00039/1237406 comprises Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on January 26, 2015, this case concerns Other Statutory Actions based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| Industrial Print Technologies LLC | O'Neil Data Systems, Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Company |
| [Case # 15-cv-00020/927589], [Filed: January 22, 2015] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information |
|
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| Industrial Print Technologies LLC | Quad/Graphics, Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Company |
| [Case # 15-cv-00025/927590], [Filed: January 22, 2015] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information |
|
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| Industrial Print Technologies LLC | Cenveo Inc and Hewlett Packard Company |
| [Case # 15-cv-00165/927592], [Filed: January 22, 2015] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, January 24, 2015 ⚖ Case 7:2015cv00032/1236423 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 7:2015cv00032/1236423 involves Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on January 24, 2015, this case pertains to Naturalization Application under 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Presiding over this matter is Judge Unassigned. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, January 16, 2015 ⚖ Case 3:2015cv00165/255606 In case 3:2015cv00165/255606 within US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Industrial Print Technologies LLC brings a case against Cenveo Inc and Hewlett Packard Company. Filed on January 16, 2015, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is David C Godbey, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 16, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv00145/1234752 The legal proceedings in case 4:2015cv00145/1234752 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve Irving Flores and New Orleans Cold Storage and Warehouse, Ltd, NOCS International, Ltd., NOCS South Atlantic Inc and NOCS West Gulf, Inc. Filed on January 16, 2015, this case focuses on Fair Labor Standards Act based on 29 U.S.C. § 201. Judge Sim Lake is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irving Flores, ✅ New Orleans Cold Storage … | |
|
Texas, January 22, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv00215/1236145 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2015cv00215/1236145, Isiah Courtney files a suit against Petromar International, Inc. and Alexandros Koutsakis. The filing date was January 22, 2015, and this case concerns Fair Labor Standards Act under 29 U.S.C. § 201. Presiding over the case is Judge Keith P Ellison. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Isiah Courtney, ✅ Alexandros Koutsakis … | |
|
Texas, December 30, 2014 ⚖ Case 2:2014mc01336/1231458 Alright, we got Ilda Irene Aguilar versus Carolyn W. Colvin here. Case number case 2:2014mc01336/1231458, kicked off on December 30, 2014. This is about Other, hanging with Judge B. Janice Ellington, Nelva Gonzales Ramos. More Information about >>> ✅ Ilda Irene Aguilar, ✅ Carolyn W. Colvin … | |
|
Texas, January 29, 2015 ⚖ Case 3:2015cv00299/256003 US District Court for the Northern District of Texas case 3:2015cv00299/256003 comprises Intense Printing Inc and Interactive Printing Inks and Coatings Inc and Performance Printing Corp. Filed on January 29, 2015, this case concerns Trademark based on 28 U.S.C. § 1338. Judge Ed Kinkeade is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Interactive Printing Inks … | |
|
Texas, January 29, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv00263/1237797 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2015cv00263/1237797 comprises IberiaBank and Robert O'Neal. Filed on January 29, 2015, this case concerns Other Contract based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge David Hittner is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 20, 2015 ⚖ Case 1:2015cv00041/732192 The legal proceedings in case 1:2015cv00041/732192 at US District Court for the Western District of Texas involve Innovative Aftermarket Systems, L.P. and Smart Dealer Technologies, LLC. Filed on January 20, 2015, this case focuses on Trademark based on 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement. Judge Robert Pitman is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 20, 2015 ⚖ Case 6:2015cv00059/156921 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 6:2015cv00059/156921, Intellectual Ventures II LLC files a suit against BITCO General Insurance Corporation f/k/a Bituminous Casualty Corporation and BITCO National Insurance Company f/k/a Bituminous Fire and Marine Insurance Company. The filing date was January 20, 2015, and this case concerns Patent under 15 U.S.C. § 1126. Presiding over the case is Judge Rodney Gilstrap. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Bituminous Fire … | |
|
Texas, January 20, 2015 ⚖ Case 6:2015cv00060/156925 The legal proceedings in case 6:2015cv00060/156925 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Intellectual Ventures II LLC and Great West Casualty Company. Filed on January 20, 2015, this case focuses on Patent based on 15 U.S.C. § 1126. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all