How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
G -> Garza...(click to open)
Garza, Abdon
Garza, Ignacia
Gonzalez, Irma
Gonzalez, Ramon
Guerra, Isaac
|
Texas, July 16, 2014 ⚖ Case 2:2014cv00774/153665 Within the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, Innovative Automation LLC brings forward a case against OverDrive, Inc. in Case Number case 2:2014cv00774/153665. Initiated on July 16, 2014, this legal matter pertains to an Patent issue based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. It's important to mention that Plaintiff has requested a jury for this case. | |
|
Texas, July 16, 2014 ⚖ Case 2:2014cv00773/153664 At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, case 2:2014cv00773/153664 involves Innovative Automation LLC suing Follett Higher Education Group, Inc. Filed on July 16, 2014, this case addresses a matter related to Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Plaintiff has explicitly requested a jury for this litigation. | |
|
Texas, July 16, 2014 ⚖ Case 2:2014cv00776/153669 In case 2:2014cv00776/153669, Innovative Automation LLC takes legal action against Vital Source Technologies, Inc. d/b/a CourseSmart at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Filed on July 16, 2014, this case revolves around a Patent issue under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. It's notable that Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case. | |
|
Texas, July 16, 2014 ⚖ Case 2:2014cv00775/153668 Within the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, Innovative Automation LLC brings forward a case against Scholastic Storia Inc. and Scholastic Book Clubs Inc. in Case Number case 2:2014cv00775/153668. Initiated on July 16, 2014, this legal matter pertains to an Patent issue based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. It's important to mention that Plaintiff has requested a jury for this case. | |
|
Texas, June 27, 2014 ⚖ Case 7:2014cv00554/1186677 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 7:2014cv00554/1186677, Isaac Guerra files a suit against Standard Guaranty Insurance Company. The filing date was June 27, 2014, and this case concerns Insurance under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Presiding over the case is Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Isaac Guerra … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ivan Jose Manzano
More Information |
William T Stephens |
| [Case # 2014cv01919/1188834], [Filed: June 27, 2014] [ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ] [Judge: Lee H Rosenthal] ✅ William T Stephens >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, June 27, 2014 ⚖ Case 7:2014cv00563/1186956 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 7:2014cv00563/1186956 comprises Irma Gonzalez and Ramon Gonzalez and Allstate Texas Lloyds and Allstate National Catastrophe Team. Filed on June 27, 2014, this case concerns Insurance based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Randy Crane is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Gonzalez, ✅ Ramon Gonzalez, ✅ Allstate Texas Lloyds, ✅ Allstate National Catastrophe Team … | |
|
Texas, July 14, 2014 ⚖ Case 6:2014cv00612/153642 In case 6:2014cv00612/153642 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Inventergy Inc. brings a case against GENBAND Inc. Filed on July 14, 2014, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 15 U.S.C. § 1126. The presiding judge is Michael H. Schneider, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 14, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00464/153612 At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2014cv00464/153612 entails Ipolito Cardenas and Lilia Cardenas and Bank of America, N.A. The filing date is July 14, 2014, and this case deals with All Other Real Property as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Amos L. Mazzant is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Ipolito Cardenas, ✅ Lilia Cardenas … | |
|
Texas, March 14, 2014 ⚖ Case 3:2014cv00948/244470 At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2014cv00948/244470 involves Interface Security Systems LLC and Drive Thru Technology Inc. Filed on March 14, 2014, this case deals with Other Statutory Actions based on 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Judge Sidney A Fitzwater is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, March 14, 2014 ⚖ Case 3:2014cv00094/680829 The legal proceedings in case 3:2014cv00094/680829 at US District Court for the Western District of Texas involve Isabel C. Solis and AT&T. Filed on March 14, 2014, this case focuses on Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment based on 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim. Judge David C Guaderrama is presiding, and it's notable that Both have requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Isabel C. Solis … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ivery T Williams
More Information |
Rissi Owens and Texas Board Pardons and Parole Members |
| [Case # 2014cv02652/249702], [Filed: July 23, 2014] [ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ] [Judge: David C Godbey, David L Horan] ✅ Rissi Owens, ✅ Texas Board Pardons, ✅ Parole Members >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, July 22, 2014 ⚖ Case 7:2014cv00649/1192070 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 7:2014cv00649/1192070 involves Ignacia Garza and Abdon Garza and Allstate Texas Lloyds. Filed on July 22, 2014, this case deals with Insurance based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Randy Crane is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ignacia Garza, ✅ Abdon Garza, ✅ Allstate Texas Lloyds … | |
|
Texas, July 24, 2014 ⚖ Case 7:2014cv00679/1193065 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 7:2014cv00679/1193065 involves Irma Martinez and Edelmiro Martinez and Allstate Texas Lloyds. Filed on July 24, 2014, this case deals with Insurance based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Randy Crane is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Defendant has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Martinez, ✅ Edelmiro Martinez, ✅ Allstate Texas Lloyds … | |
|
Texas, July 21, 2014 ⚖ Case 1:2014cv00675/706342 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the case 1:2014cv00675/706342 involves Interior Music Corp., EMI Virgin Songs, Inc., Concord Music Group, Inc. and Broadcast Music, Inc. and Shakespeare's Pub, Inc. and Bob E. Woody. Filed on July 21, 2014, this case pertains to Copyright under 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement. Presiding over this matter is Judge Lee Yeakel. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Bob E. Woody … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all