How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, January 02, 2014 ⚖ Case 7:2014cv00001/1143629 In a legal showdown that reverberates with intensity, the corridors of the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas echo with the clash between Isela Alvarez and Antonio Alvarez and Samantha Keller and Allstate Texas Lloyds. Dated January 02, 2014, this legal saga, identified by docket number case 7:2014cv00001/1143629, thrusts into the spotlight with a passionate fervor. The battleground? A tumultuous arena of contractual conflicts encapsulated under the umbrella of "Insurance" as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332. However, amidst this legal storm, what ignites the flames of anticipation is Plaintiff's adamant insistence on a jury trial. It's a bold, unyielding stance, signaling a zealous yearning for resolution through the judgment of peers in this emotionally charged confrontation. More Information about >>> ✅ Isela Alvarez, ✅ Antonio Alvarez, ✅ Samantha Keller, ✅ Allstate Texas Lloyds … | |
|
Texas, January 02, 2014 ⚖ Case 7:2014cv00001/668541 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Irma Dawson and Carolyn W. Colvin are involved in case 7:2014cv00001/668541. Filed on January 02, 2014, this legal matter focuses on Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI under 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision. Judge David Counts, Robert A. Junell is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Dawson, ✅ Carolyn W. Colvin … | |
|
Texas, June 26, 2014 ⚖ Case 1:2014cv00602/702346 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Isaias Guerrero and Jose Ramiro Batres and Bank of America, N.A. and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC are involved in case 1:2014cv00602/702346. Filed on June 26, 2014, this legal matter focuses on Real Property: Other under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship). Judge Mark Lane, Lee Yeakel is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ Isaias Guerrero, ✅ Jose Ramiro Batres … | |
|
Texas, July 03, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv01876/1187670 In case 4:2014cv01876/1187670 within US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, International Rags, LTD brings a case against Insaf Nehme and NOA, LLC. Filed on July 03, 2014, this legal matter relates to Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment as per 28 U.S.C. § 1330. The presiding judge is Vanessa D Gilmore, and the Defendant has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ International Rags, ✅ Insaf Nehme … | |
|
Texas, June 30, 2014 ⚖ Case 3:2014mc00102/248755 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Integracolor Ltd and Robert Grooms, Michael McClure, Gary Stover and Jeffrey Harris are involved in case 3:2014mc00102/248755. Filed on June 30, 2014, this legal matter focuses on Other Statutory Actions under Motion to Quash. Judge Jane J Boyle, David L Horan is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ Robert Grooms, ✅ Michael McClure, ✅ Gary Stover, ✅ Jeffrey Harris … | |
|
Texas, June 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 3:2014cv02182/248187 In case 3:2014cv02182/248187 within US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Isidro Carbajal and Teresa Villalobos brings a case against State Farm Lloyds and Gregory Del Cid. Filed on June 13, 2014, this legal matter relates to Insurance as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The presiding judge is Jane J Boyle, and the Defendant has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Isidro Carbajal, ✅ Teresa Villalobos, ✅ Gregory Del Cid … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Isreal Saul Mendoza
More Information |
William Stephens |
| [Case # 2014cv00288/1188356], [Filed: June 30, 2014] [ General§28 U.S.C. § 2241 ⚖ ] [Judge: B. Janice Ellington, Nelva Gonzales Ramos] ✅ William Stephens >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, May 27, 2014 ⚖ Case 2:2014cv00645/152775 In case 2:2014cv00645/152775 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Innovative Solutions & Support, Inc. brings a case against US Aviation Group LLC, Tech Aero Avionics, Aerospace Instrument Support, Quality Aircraft Services, Hartsell Avionics Inc., Mid-Continent Instrument Co., Inc., Tomlinson Avionics of Texas, Aerotex International Inc., Air Dallas Instruments Inc. and Select. Filed on May 27, 2014, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Rodney Gilstrap, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Tech Aero Avionics, ✅ Aerospace Instrument Support … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all