How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, May 09, 2014 ⚖ Case 7:2014cv00269/1176877 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 7:2014cv00269/1176877, Incorrectly Filed files a suit against Incorrectly Filed. The filing date was May 09, 2014, and this case concerns Other Statutory Actions under 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Presiding over the case is Judge Unassigned. The Defendant has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ismael H Padilla
More Information |
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID |
| [Case # 2014cv01818/247055], [Filed: May 19, 2014] [ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ] [Judge: A. Joe Fish, Paul D Stickney] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, May 09, 2014 ⚖ Case 7:2014cv00261/1176816 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 7:2014cv00261/1176816 entails Idolina Villalon and State Farm Lloyds. The filing date is May 09, 2014, and this case deals with Other Contract as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Micaela Alvarez is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Idolina Villalon … | |
|
Texas, May 09, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv01279/1176808 In case 4:2014cv01279/1176808 within US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, IBM United Kingdom Pensions Trust Limited, Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund Trustee Limited, Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund Trustees Limited, Allianz Global Investors France S.A. and John Lewis Partnership Pensions Trust brings a case against BP PLC, BP America Inc, BP Exploration & Production Inc, Anthony Hayward, Douglas Suttles, Andrew Inglis, H. Lamar McKay and Robert Dudley. Filed on May 09, 2014, this legal matter relates to Other Statutory Actions as per 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The presiding judge is Keith P Ellison, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Anthony Hayward, ✅ Douglas Suttles, ✅ Andrew Inglis, ✅ H. Lamar McKay, ✅ Robert Dudley … | |
|
Texas, May 12, 2014 ⚖ Case 7:2014cv00291/1177265 The legal proceedings in case 7:2014cv00291/1177265 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on May 12, 2014, this case focuses on Other Statutory Actions based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is presiding, and it's notable that the Defendant has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ismael H Padilla
More Information |
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID |
| [Case # 2014cv01750/246829], [Filed: May 13, 2014] [ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ] [Judge: Jane J Boyle, Renee Harris Toliver] ✅ William Stephens >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, May 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv01325/1177543 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2014cv01325/1177543 involves Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on May 13, 2014, this case deals with Other Statutory Actions based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Imade Anthony Osarinmwian
More Information |
Eric Holder, Jeh Johnson, Kenneth Landgrebe and R Laci |
| [Case # 2014cv01324/1177539], [Filed: May 13, 2014] [ Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee§28 U.S.C. § 2241 ⚖ ] [Judge: Gray H. Miller] ✅ Eric Holder, ✅ Jeh Johnson, ✅ Kenneth Landgrebe, ✅ R Laci >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, May 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 3:2014cv01762/246852 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 2337 and Luminant Mining Company LLC are involved in case 3:2014cv01762/246852. Filed on May 13, 2014, this legal matter focuses on Labor/Management Relations under 29 U.S.C. § 185. Judge Ed Kinkeade is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. | |
|
Texas, June 02, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv01521/1181684 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2014cv01521/1181684, Iris Chavez-Soto files a suit against The Prince Law Group, P.C., Prince & Associates, P.C. and Prince Uche Nwakanma. The filing date was June 02, 2014, and this case concerns Fair Labor Standards Act under 15 U.S.C. § 1938. Presiding over the case is Judge Melinda Harmon. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Iris Chavez-Soto, ✅ Prince Uche Nwakanma … | |
|
Texas, May 22, 2014 ⚖ Case 3:2014cv00192/695810 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the case 3:2014cv00192/695810 involves Impulse Monitoring, Inc. and Aetna Health Inc. Filed on May 22, 2014, this case pertains to Insurance under 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal. Presiding over this matter is Judge Frank Montalvo. There is no demand for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, May 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 2:2014cv00624/152443 The legal proceedings in case 2:2014cv00624/152443 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Innovative Display Technologies LLC and Mazda Motor Corporation and Mazda Motor of America, Inc. Filed on May 13, 2014, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ivan Xavier Esparza
More Information |
William Stephens |
| [Case # 2014cv01038/1170368], [Filed: April 16, 2014] [ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ] [Judge: Lee H Rosenthal] ✅ William Stephens >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, June 10, 2014 ⚖ Case 3:2014cv00215/699285 At the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the legal case 3:2014cv00215/699285 entails Impulse Monitoring, Inc. and Humana Health Plan, Inc. The filing date is June 10, 2014, and this case deals with Contract: Recovery Medicare as per 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal. Judge Frank Montalvo is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. | |
|
Texas, May 30, 2014 ⚖ Case 1:2014cv00500/697368 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the case 1:2014cv00500/697368 involves Impulse Monitoring, Inc. and Aetna Health Inc. Filed on May 30, 2014, this case pertains to Labor: E.R.I.S.A. under 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal - ERISA. Presiding over this matter is Judge Sam Sparks. There is no demand for a jury trial. | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Incorrectly Filed
More Information |
Incorrectly Filed |
| [Case # 2014cv01628/1183941], [Filed: June 11, 2014] [ Other Statutory Actions§88 U.S.C. § 8888 ⚖ ] [Judge: Unassigned] ✅ Incorrectly Filed >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, May 26, 2014 ⚖ Case 2:2014cv00644/152768 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 2:2014cv00644/152768, IOdapt, LLC files a suit against Buffalo Americas, Inc. The filing date was May 26, 2014, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. Presiding over the case is Judge Rodney Gilstrap, Roy S. Payne. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, February 28, 2014 ⚖ Case 1:2014cv00180/677937 US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 1:2014cv00180/677937 comprises International Mechanical Services, Inc. and Great American Insurance Company. Filed on February 28, 2014, this case concerns Miller Act based on 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act. Judge Lee Yeakel is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, February 28, 2014 ⚖ Case 5:2014cv00180/677800 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 5:2014cv00180/677800, IAS Service Group, LLC files a suit against James Buckley, Barbara Buckley and Jim Buckley & Associates, Inc. The filing date was February 28, 2014, and this case concerns Contract: Other under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question. Presiding over the case is Judge Fred Biery. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ James Buckley, ✅ Barbara Buckley … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all