Case Search – Texas (TX)

How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas

You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:

1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.

2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.

3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.

4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.

Steps to Perform a Search:

1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.

Texas Lawyers Directory


Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!


Participant Index
A -> Anderson...(click to open)   Anderson, Iesha
B -> Barnes...(click to open)   Barnes, Billy
E -> Edd...(click to open)   Edd, Nicholas
  Elegbeji, Iyabo
  Escobar, Israel
F -> Filed...(click to open)   Filed, Incorrectly
  Fofana, Ibrahim
H -> Hamilton...(click to open)   Hamilton, Rick
J -> Jauregui...(click to open)   Jauregui, Alice
  Johnson, Jeh
M -> Macnair...(click to open)   Macnair, Barbara
  Manning, Paula
  Mathis, Pondray
  Morgan, Deborah
N -> Nwachukwu...(click to open)   Nwachukwu, Ihechi
  Nwosuocha, Stanley
P -> Padilla...(click to open)   Padilla, Ismael
  Pierson, Eric
  Pocasangre, Susan
R -> Reed...(click to open)   Reed, Debra
S -> Smith...(click to open)   Smith, Christian
  Smith, Irma
T -> Taylor...(click to open)   Taylor, Allison
  Thompson, Cammie
W -> White...(click to open)   White, Holly
  Wodkins, Michael
  Worry, Lisa

Texas,   February 21, 2014
Case 2:2014cv00106/150437
At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 2:2014cv00106/150437 involves Innovative Display Technologies LLC and BMW of North America, LLC and BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC. Filed on February 21, 2014, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Texas,   February 26, 2014
Case 2:2014cv00143/150552
In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 2:2014cv00143/150552, Innovative Display Technologies LLC files a suit against Garmin LTD., and Garmin International, Inc. The filing date was February 26, 2014, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. Presiding over the case is Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Both have requested a jury trial.
Texas,   February 26, 2014
Case 2:2014cv00142/150550
In case 2:2014cv00142/150550 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Innovative Display Technologies LLC brings a case against Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A. Inc. Filed on February 26, 2014, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Rodney Gilstrap, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial.
Texas,   February 26, 2014
Case 2:2014cv00144/150553
At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 2:2014cv00144/150553 involves Innovative Display Technologies LLC and MiTAC International Corporation and MiTAC Digital Corporation. Filed on February 26, 2014, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ismael H Padilla
More Information
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
[Case # 2014cv00864/244150], [Filed: March 07, 2014]
[ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ]
[Judge: Sidney A Fitzwater, Paul D Stickney]
>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ismael H Padilla
More Information
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
[Case # 2014cv00779/243930], [Filed: March 03, 2014]
[ Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) ⚖ ]
[Judge: Jane J Boyle, Renee Harris Toliver]
>>> More Information
Texas,   March 07, 2014
Case 2:2014cv00196/150721
At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 2:2014cv00196/150721 involves IOdapt, LLC and Netgear, Inc. Filed on March 07, 2014, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Rodney Gilstrap, Roy S. Payne is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Texas,   March 03, 2014
Case 4:2014cv00528/1158676
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2014cv00528/1158676 comprises Iyabo Elegbeji and Bank of America N.A. Filed on March 03, 2014, this case concerns Foreclosure based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Nancy F. Atlas is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Iyabo Elegbeji 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ibrahim Fofana
More Information
Warden USP Beaumont
[Case # 2014cv00121/150654], [Filed: March 03, 2014]
[ General§28 U.S.C. § 2241 ⚖ ]
[Judge: Marcia A. Crone, Zack Hawthorn]
>>> More Information
Texas,   March 11, 2014
Case 4:2014cv00590/1160838
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2014cv00590/1160838 comprises Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on March 11, 2014, this case concerns Other Statutory Actions based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed 
Texas,   March 10, 2014
Case 2:2014cv00201/150741
The legal proceedings in case 2:2014cv00201/150741 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Innovative Display Technologies LLC and HYUNDAI MOTOR GROUP, Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC, Kia Motors Corporation, Kia Motors America, Inc. and KIA MOTORS MANUFACTURING GEORGIA, INC. Filed on March 10, 2014, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Texas,   March 10, 2014
Case 2:2014cv00202/150742
In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 2:2014cv00202/150742, Innovative Display Technologies LLC files a suit against Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. and Nissan North America, Inc. The filing date was March 10, 2014, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. Presiding over the case is Judge Rodney Gilstrap. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Texas,   March 10, 2014
Case 2:2014cv00200/150740
In case 2:2014cv00200/150740 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Innovative Display Technologies LLC brings a case against Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Texas, Inc., Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana, Inc., Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation, TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING, MISSISSIPPI, INC., Subaru of Indiana Au. Filed on March 10, 2014, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Rodney Gilstrap, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial.
Texas,   March 25, 2014
Case 5:2014cv00263/683191
At the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the legal case 5:2014cv00263/683191 involves Irma T. Smith and Department of The Air Force and Department Of Defense. Filed on March 25, 2014, this case deals with Personal Injury Product Liability based on 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury. Judge Harry Lee Hudspeth is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Irma T. Smith 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ihechi Nwachukwu and Stanley Nwosuocha
More Information
Jeh Johnson and Rick Hamilton
[Case # 2014cv00612/1161243], [Filed: March 12, 2014]
[ Other Immigration Actions§28 U.S.C. § 1361 ⚖ ]
[Judge: Melinda Harmon]
✅ Jeh Johnson, ✅ Rick Hamilton >>> More Information
Texas,   March 21, 2014
Case 4:2014cv00684/1163306
At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2014cv00684/1163306 involves Israel Escobar and Susan Pocasangre, Nicholas Edd, Debra Reed, Michael Wodkins, Holly White, Barbara Macnair, Christian Smith, Billy Barnes, Pondray Mathis, Alice Jauregui, Deborah Morgan, Lisa Worry, Allison Taylor, Eric Pierson, Southeast Texas Transitional Center and Off. Filed on March 21, 2014, this case deals with Civil Rights based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Judge Ewing Werlein is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that Both have requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Israel Escobar, ✅ Susan Pocasangre, ✅ Nicholas Edd, ✅ Debra Reed, ✅ Michael Wodkins, ✅ Holly White, ✅ Barbara Macnair, ✅ Christian Smith, ✅ Billy Barnes, ✅ Pondray Mathis, ✅ Alice Jauregui, ✅ Deborah Morgan, ✅ Lisa Worry, ✅ Allison Taylor, ✅ Eric Pierson 
Texas,   March 21, 2014
Case 4:2014cv00737/1163809
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2014cv00737/1163809 comprises Iesha Anderson and Brandi O'Steen, Paula Manning, Triad Resources Inc and Cammie Thompson. Filed on March 21, 2014, this case concerns Employment based on 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Judge Nancy F. Atlas is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Iesha Anderson, ✅ Paula Manning, ✅ Cammie Thompson 

2 thoughts on “Case Search – Texas (TX)”

  1. Good Morning
    I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
    I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
    Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
    In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
    The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
    RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
    Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
    Comment on the No comment

  2. RE- LARBI SEMIANI
    I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
    I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
    I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
    Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
    thanks to all

Comments are closed.