How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
H -> Hernandez...(click to open)
Hernandez, Idalia
Hernandez, Israel
Hernandez, Thomas
Holleman, Ines
Hospital, Baylor
|
Texas, February 24, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00453/1156643 The legal proceedings in case 4:2014cv00453/1156643 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve Ideal Image Development Corporation and ISMILE Practice Management of America, LLC. Filed on February 24, 2014, this case focuses on Trademark based on 15 U.S.C. § 44. Judge Vanessa D Gilmore is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Israel Perez-Solis
More Information |
USA |
| [Case # 2014cv00019/1156891], [Filed: February 24, 2014] [ Motions to Vacate Sentence§28 U.S.C. § 2255 ⚖ ] [Judge: Diana Saldana] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, February 04, 2014 ⚖ Case 6:2014cv00031/673039 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 6:2014cv00031/673039, Ivan Spells files a suit against Shapiro Schwartz, LLP, Citibank North America and CitiMortgage, Inc. The filing date was February 04, 2014, and this case concerns Consumer Credit under 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act. Presiding over the case is Judge Walter S. Smith. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ivan Spells, ✅ Shapiro Schwartz … | |
|
Texas, February 12, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00333/1153505 In case 4:2014cv00333/1153505 within US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Ines Holleman brings a case against Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC. Filed on February 12, 2014, this legal matter relates to Other Personal Injury as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The presiding judge is Keith P Ellison, and the Defendant has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ines Holleman … | |
|
Texas, February 20, 2014 ⚖ Case 7:2014cv00084/1155723 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 7:2014cv00084/1155723, Idalia R. Hernandez and Thomas J. Hernandez files a suit against Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. The filing date was February 20, 2014, and this case concerns All Other Real Property under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Presiding over the case is Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Idalia R. Hernandez, ✅ Thomas J. Hernandez … | |
|
Texas, February 19, 2014 ⚖ Case 5:2014cv00018/1155161 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 5:2014cv00018/1155161 entails Irma Villanueva and FDIC. The filing date is February 19, 2014, and this case deals with Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment as per 28 U.S.C. § 1446. Judge Guillermo R. Garcia, Diana Saldana is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Villanueva … | |
|
Texas, March 06, 2014 ⚖ Case 3:2014cv00845/244108 At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2014cv00845/244108 entails iNetico Inc and Dart Container of Michigan LLC and Baylor Specialty Hospital, Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation, Baylor Medical Center - Irving, Baylor/Richardson Medical Center, Baylor Medical Center at Grapevine, Baylor Medical Center at Garland, Baylor Scott & White Health, Baylor Medical Center. The filing date is March 06, 2014, and this case deals with Other Contract as per 12 U.S.C. § 635. Judge David C Godbey is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Baylor Specialty Hospital … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Israel Espinoza Hernandez
More Information |
USA |
| [Case # 2014cv00858/244123], [Filed: March 06, 2014] [ Motions to Vacate Sentence§28 U.S.C. § 2255 ⚖ ] [Judge: Jane J Boyle, Irma Carrillo Ramirez] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, March 06, 2014 ⚖ Case 1:2014cv00199/679121 In case 1:2014cv00199/679121 within US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Irma Ramos brings a case against Austin Rehab Operations, L.L.C, Austin Health Facilities, L.P. and Austin Health Facilities, G.P., L.L.C. Filed on March 06, 2014, this legal matter relates to Labor: Fair Standards as per 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act. The presiding judge is Lee Yeakel, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Ramos, ✅ Austin Rehab Operations … | |
|
Texas, March 06, 2014 ⚖ Case 2:2014cv00189/150696 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 2:2014cv00189/150696, Internet Communications Solutions LLC files a suit against Skype Communications S.a r.l., Microsoft Corporation and Skype Inc. The filing date was March 06, 2014, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. Presiding over the case is Judge Rodney Gilstrap. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, February 19, 2014 ⚖ Case 7:2014cv00078/1155130 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 7:2014cv00078/1155130 comprises Irma Riojas and Jose Riojas, Jr and Bank Of America, N.A. Filed on February 19, 2014, this case concerns All Other Real Property based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Micaela Alvarez is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Riojas, ✅ Jose Riojas … | |
|
Texas, February 27, 2014 ⚖ Case 2:2014cv00146/150555 In case 2:2014cv00146/150555 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Innovative Display Technologies LLC brings a case against TomTom International BV and TomTom North America Inc. Filed on February 27, 2014, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Rodney Gilstrap, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, February 27, 2014 ⚖ Case 2:2014cv00145/150554 In case 2:2014cv00145/150554 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Innovative Display Technologies LLC brings a case against Nikon Corporation and Nikon Inc. Filed on February 27, 2014, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Rodney Gilstrap, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all