How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
E -> Escalante...(click to open)
Escalante, Aaron
Escalante, Hector
Escalante, Irene
Escalante-Garza, Clarissa
|
Texas, January 21, 2014 ⚖ Case 3:2014cv00233/242272 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the case 3:2014cv00233/242272 involves Integrated Sports Media, Inc. and Adelina Hidi, Callisto Private Club, Inc. and Feride Hidi. Filed on January 21, 2014, this case pertains to Cable/Satellite TV under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Presiding over this matter is Judge A. Joe Fish. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Adelina Hidi, ✅ Feride Hidi … | |
|
Texas, January 21, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00145/1147677 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Intermarine, LLC and SPLIETHOFF BEVRACHTINGSKANTOOR B.V., SPLIETHOFF AMERICAS, INC., and Kasper Bihlet are involved in case 4:2014cv00145/1147677. Filed on January 21, 2014, this legal matter focuses on Other Statutory Actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Judge Vanessa D Gilmore is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ SPLIETHOFF BEVRACHTINGSKANTOOR, ✅ Kasper Bihlet … | |
|
Texas, January 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 2:2014cv00019/149693 In case 2:2014cv00019/149693 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Industrial Print Technologies LLC brings a case against Canon U.S.A., Inc. and Canon Solutions America, Inc. Filed on January 13, 2014, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Rodney Gilstrap, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00028/149699 The legal proceedings in case 4:2014cv00028/149699 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. and Lindy Computer Connection Technology, Inc. Filed on January 13, 2014, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Richard A. Schell is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00031/149703 In case 4:2014cv00031/149703 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. brings a case against Philips Electronics North America Corporation. Filed on January 13, 2014, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Richard A. Schell, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00026/149696 The legal proceedings in case 4:2014cv00026/149696 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. and StarTech.com USA L.L.P. Filed on January 13, 2014, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Ron Clark, Amos L. Mazzant is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 2:2014cv00012/1146134 The legal proceedings in case 2:2014cv00012/1146134 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve Irene Escalante, Hector Escalante, Jr., Aaron Escalante and Clarissa Escalante-Garza and Deere & Company, Gulf Tractor Company and South Texas Implement Co. Filed on January 13, 2014, this case focuses on Personal Injury- Product Liability based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos is presiding, and it's notable that Both have requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irene Escalante, ✅ Hector Escalante, ✅ Aaron Escalante, ✅ Clarissa Escalante-Garza … | |
|
Texas, January 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00027/149697 In case 4:2014cv00027/149697 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. brings a case against Tera Grand Corporation. Filed on January 13, 2014, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Richard A. Schell, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00023/149692 In case 4:2014cv00023/149692 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Ideative Product Ventures Inc brings a case against Monster Cable Products, Inc. Filed on January 13, 2014, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Richard A. Schell, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 7:2014cv00013/1146136 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 7:2014cv00013/1146136 involves Irma Sanchez and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Filed on January 13, 2014, this case deals with Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 based on 29 U.S.C. § 1132. Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Sanchez … | |
|
Texas, January 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00025/149695 In case 4:2014cv00025/149695 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. brings a case against Staples, Inc. Filed on January 13, 2014, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Richard A. Schell, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00032/149704 In case 4:2014cv00032/149704 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. brings a case against TigerDirect, Inc. Filed on January 13, 2014, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Richard A. Schell, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00021/149690 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 4:2014cv00021/149690, Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. files a suit against Hewlett Packard Company. The filing date was January 13, 2014, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. Presiding over the case is Judge Richard A. Schell. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00022/149691 In case 4:2014cv00022/149691 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. brings a case against Monoprice, Inc. Filed on January 13, 2014, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Richard A. Schell, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ismael H Padilla
More Information |
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID |
| [Case # 2014cv00364/242647], [Filed: January 30, 2014] [ General§28 U.S.C. § 2241 ⚖ ] [Judge: Sam A Lindsay, Paul D Stickney] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, January 13, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00020/149688 The legal proceedings in case 4:2014cv00020/149688 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. and CTA Digital, Inc. Filed on January 13, 2014, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Ron Clark, Amos L. Mazzant is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, February 03, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00236/1150921 The legal proceedings in case 4:2014cv00236/1150921 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve Isaac J O'Neal and James M Dugar and City Of Houston. Filed on February 03, 2014, this case focuses on Employment based on 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Judge Sim Lake is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ James M Dugar … | |
|
Texas, February 03, 2014 ⚖ Case 4:2014cv00246/1151046 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2014cv00246/1151046 involves Integrated Production Services, Inc. and Epic Lift Systems, LLC f/k/a Epic Well Services LLC. Filed on February 03, 2014, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Sim Lake is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
| Plaintiff versus DefendantRespondent | |
| Iconics | Vincent R Volpe, Jr. |
| [Case # 2014mc00417/1153249], [Filed: February 07, 2014] [ Other§ ⚖ ] [Judge: Lynn N. Hughes] ✅ Vincent R Volpe >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, February 07, 2014 ⚖ Case 3:2014cv00482/242965 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the case 3:2014cv00482/242965 involves Ibim Harry and Dallas Housing Authority. Filed on February 07, 2014, this case pertains to Other Civil Rights under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Presiding over this matter is Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ibim Harry … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all