Case Search – Texas (TX)

How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas

You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:

1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.

2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.

3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.

4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.

Steps to Perform a Search:

1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.

Texas Lawyers Directory


Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!


Participant Index
A -> Arismendez...(click to open)   Arismendez, Mike
B -> Brantley...(click to open)   Brantley, Isis
  Butler, Thomas
C -> Cipriani...(click to open)   Cipriani, Ismael
  Consultant, Natural
D -> Darden...(click to open)   Darden, Robert
E -> Eastman...(click to open)   Eastman, Anna
F -> Filed...(click to open)   Filed, Incorrectly
  Flood, Isaih
  Flores, Isaac
G -> Gautney...(click to open)   Gautney, Hilda
  Grier, Terry
K -> Krostag...(click to open)   Krostag, John
  Kuntz, William
M -> McNeal-Sheppard...(click to open)   McNeal-Sheppard, Marla
  Molina, Juan
  Morgan, Luann
  Moses, Fred
  Mueller, Sean
  Mumphrey, Ronald
O -> Ornamentations...(click to open)   Ornamentations, Isis
P -> Phillips...(click to open)   Phillips, Isaac
R -> Rodewald...(click to open)   Rodewald, Catherine
  Rosa, Santos
S -> Saavedra...(click to open)   Saavedra, Abelardo
  Saldivar, Irene
  Sawatzky, W
  Shah, Ravi
Y -> Yurco...(click to open)   Yurco, Deborah

Texas,   September 30, 2013
Case 4:2013cv02882/1120778
The legal proceedings in case 4:2013cv02882/1120778 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve Ismael Cipriani, Juan Molina and Santos Santana De la Rosa and Nottingham Village LLC. Filed on September 30, 2013, this case focuses on Labor: Fair Standards based on 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act. Judge Keith P Ellison is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Ismael Cipriani, ✅ Juan Molina, ✅ Santos Santana De la Rosa 
Texas,   September 18, 2013
Case 4:2013cv02754/1117495
The legal proceedings in case 4:2013cv02754/1117495 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve International Energy Ventures Management LLC and United Energy Group, LTD. and Sean Mueller. Filed on September 18, 2013, this case focuses on Contract: Recovery/Enforcement based on 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract. Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt is presiding, and it's notable that Both have requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Sean Mueller 
Texas,   October 10, 2013
Case 1:2013cv00613/147775
At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 1:2013cv00613/147775 involves Isaac Flores and Drew Sawatzky, Robert Darden, Crawford & Company, Allstate Insurance Company, John Krostag and Hilda Gautney. Filed on October 10, 2013, this case deals with Insurance based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Marcia A. Crone is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that Both have requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Isaac Flores, ✅ w Sawatzky, ✅ Robert Darden, ✅ John Krostag, ✅ Hilda Gautney 
Texas,   October 01, 2013
Case 1:2013cv00872/653855
US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 1:2013cv00872/653855 comprises Isis Ornamentations and Natural Care Consultant and Isis Brantley and LuAnn Roberts Morgan, Fred N. Moses, William H. Kuntz, Jr., Thomas F. Butler, Mike Arismendez, Catherine Rodewald, Ravi Shah and Deborah Yurco. Filed on October 01, 2013, this case concerns Civil Rights: Other based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act. Judge Sam Sparks is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Isis Ornamentations, ✅ Natural Care Consultant, ✅ Isis Brantley, ✅ LuAnn Roberts Morgan, ✅ Fred N. Moses, ✅ William H. Kuntz, ✅ Thomas F. Butler, ✅ Mike Arismendez, ✅ Catherine Rodewald, ✅ Ravi Shah, ✅ Deborah Yurco 
Texas,   October 01, 2013
Case 7:2013mc01281/1121122
At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 7:2013mc01281/1121122 entails Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. The filing date is October 01, 2013, and this case deals with Other Statutory Actions as per 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Randy Crane is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded.
More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed 
Texas,   October 01, 2013
Case 2:2013cv00783/147577
In case 2:2013cv00783/147577 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Innovative Display Technologies LLC brings a case against Microsoft Corporation. Filed on October 01, 2013, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Rodney Gilstrap, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial.
Texas,   October 04, 2013
Case 2:2013cv00793/147684
In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 2:2013cv00793/147684, InMotion Imagery Technologies, LLC files a suit against NTI Corporation. The filing date was October 04, 2013, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. Presiding over the case is Judge Rodney Gilstrap. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Texas,   October 04, 2013
Case 4:2013cv02935/1122187
At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2013cv02935/1122187 involves Isaac Phillips and Ronald Mumphrey, Terry B Grier, Anna Eastman, Houston Independent School District, Marla McNeal-Sheppard, John Doe and Abelardo Saavedra. Filed on October 04, 2013, this case deals with Other Civil Rights based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Judge Gray H. Miller is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Isaac Phillips, ✅ Ronald Mumphrey, ✅ Terry B Grier, ✅ Anna Eastman, ✅ Marla McNeal-Sheppard, ✅ Abelardo Saavedra 
Texas,   October 04, 2013
Case 2:2013cv00794/147685
In case 2:2013cv00794/147685 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, InMotion Imagery Technologies, LLC brings a case against Womble Multimedia, Inc. Filed on October 04, 2013, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Rodney Gilstrap, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial.
Texas,   October 04, 2013
Case 2:2013cv00792/147683
In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 2:2013cv00792/147683, InMotion Imagery Technologies, LLC files a suit against MedioStream, Inc. The filing date was October 04, 2013, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. Presiding over the case is Judge Rodney Gilstrap. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Texas,   October 01, 2013
Case 2:2013cv00784/147578
At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 2:2013cv00784/147578 involves Innovative Display Technologies LLC and Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc. Filed on October 01, 2013, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Texas,   October 04, 2013
Case 1:2013cv00182/1122224
In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Irene Saldivar and City of San Benito, Texas are involved in case 1:2013cv00182/1122224. Filed on October 04, 2013, this legal matter focuses on Other Contract under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Judge Hilda G Tagle is presiding, and no jury trial is requested.
More Information about >>> ✅ Irene Saldivar 
Texas,   September 13, 2013
Case 4:2013cv02690/1115759
In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2013cv02690/1115759, Isaih Flood files a suit against Schuster Investments, Inc. The filing date was September 13, 2013, and this case concerns Fair Labor Standards Act under 15 U.S.C. § 2. Presiding over the case is Judge Sim Lake. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Isaih Flood 
Texas,   September 13, 2013
Case 4:2013cv02698/1116046
In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 4:2013cv02698/1116046 involves Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on September 13, 2013, this case pertains to Other Statutory Actions under 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Presiding over this matter is Judge Unassigned. There is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed 

2 thoughts on “Case Search – Texas (TX)”

  1. Good Morning
    I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
    I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
    Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
    In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
    The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
    RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
    Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
    Comment on the No comment

  2. RE- LARBI SEMIANI
    I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
    I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
    I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
    Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
    thanks to all

Comments are closed.