How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
More Information |
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID |
| [Case # 2013cv01702/231905], [Filed: April 30, 2013] [ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) ⚖ ] [Judge: David C Godbey, Renee Harris Toliver] ✅ William Stephens >>> More Information |
|
| Plaintiff versus DefendantRespondent | |
| Intellectual Ventures II LLC and Intellectual Ventures I LLC | Microsemi Corporation, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, Altera Corporation and Xilinx, Inc. |
| [Case # 2013mc00352/625465], [Filed: April 30, 2013] [ Other Statutory Actions§Motion to Quash ⚖ ] [Judge: Lee Yeakel] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, April 30, 2013 ⚖ Case 7:2013cv00200/1076318 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 7:2013cv00200/1076318 involves Inez Gonzalez and State Farm Lloyds. Filed on April 30, 2013, this case deals with Insurance based on 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance. Judge Micaela Alvarez is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Inez Gonzalez … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ira Klein
More Information |
Rodney Chandler |
| [Case # 2013cv00372/231961], [Filed: May 06, 2013] [ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ⚖ ] [Judge: Terry R Means] ✅ Rodney Chandler >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, May 06, 2013 ⚖ Case 3:2013cv01720/231948 At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2013cv01720/231948 entails IBEW Local Union No 479 Pension Fund, IBEW Local Union No 479 Annuity/401(k) Fund, National Electrical Benefit Fund and IBEW-NECA Southwestern Health and Benefit Fund and Scott Moore Enterprises Inc. The filing date is May 06, 2013, and this case deals with Contract: Other as per 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement. Judge Jane J Boyle is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ National Electrical Benefit Fund, ✅ Benefit Fund … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
More Information |
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID |
| [Case # 2013cv01855/232501], [Filed: May 16, 2013] [ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) ⚖ ] [Judge: David C Godbey, David L Horan] ✅ William Stephens >>> More Information |
|
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Isaac Thomas
More Information |
State of Texas |
| [Case # 2013cv00350/144957], [Filed: June 03, 2013] [ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) ⚖ ] [Judge: Marcia A. Crone, Keith F. Giblin] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, June 04, 2013 ⚖ Case 6:2013cv00463/144977 In case 6:2013cv00463/144977 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Innovative Automation, LLC brings a case against Kobo, Inc. Filed on June 04, 2013, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement. The presiding judge is Leonard Davis, John D. Love, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, June 04, 2013 ⚖ Case 6:2013cv00462/144975 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 6:2013cv00462/144975, Innovative Automation, LLC files a suit against Barnes & Noble College Booksellers, LLC, Barnes & Noble, Inc., Nook Media, LLC and Microsoft Corporation. The filing date was June 04, 2013, and this case concerns Patent under 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Leonard Davis, John D. Love. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, June 04, 2013 ⚖ Case 6:2013cv00466/144982 The legal proceedings in case 6:2013cv00466/144982 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Innovative Automation, LLC and Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics, Inc. Filed on June 04, 2013, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Leonard Davis, John D. Love is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
| Plaintiff versus DefendantRespondent | |
| Intellectual Ventures II LLC and Intellectual Ventures I LLC | Microsemi Corporation, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, Altera Corporation and Xilinx, Inc. |
| [Case # 2013mc00465/633392], [Filed: June 05, 2013] [ Other Statutory Actions§Motion to Quash ⚖ ] [Judge: Lee Yeakel] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, June 05, 2013 ⚖ Case 4:2013cv00457/233248 The legal proceedings in case 4:2013cv00457/233248 at US District Court for the Northern District of Texas involve Invue Security Products Inc and Langhong Technology Co, Ltd and Langhong Technology USA Inc. Filed on June 05, 2013, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement. Judge John McBryde is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, June 04, 2013 ⚖ Case 6:2013cv00461/144972 The legal proceedings in case 6:2013cv00461/144972 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Innovative Automation, LLC and Books-A-Million, Inc. Filed on June 04, 2013, this case focuses on Patent based on 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement. Judge Leonard Davis, John D. Love is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, June 04, 2013 ⚖ Case 6:2013cv00465/144980 At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 6:2013cv00465/144980 involves Innovative Automation, LLC and Rhapsody International, Inc. Filed on June 04, 2013, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Leonard Davis, John D. Love is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, June 04, 2013 ⚖ Case 6:2013cv00460/144970 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 6:2013cv00460/144970, Innovative Automation, LLC files a suit against Digiboo, LLC, Books-A-Million, Inc., Barnes & Noble, Inc., Barnes & Noble College Booksellers, LLC, Nook Media, LLC, Microsoft Corporation, Kobo Inc., Rhapsody International, Inc., Sony Corporation of America and Sony Electronics, Inc. The filing date was June 04, 2013, and this case concerns Patent under 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Leonard Davis, John D. Love. Both have requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, May 28, 2013 ⚖ Case 4:2013cv00295/144856 US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 4:2013cv00295/144856 comprises Issac Wilridge and Select Portfolio Servicing Inc, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Aames Funding Corporation. Filed on May 28, 2013, this case concerns Real Property: Foreclosure based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal. Judge Ron Clark, Amos L. Mazzant is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Issac Wilridge … | |
|
Texas, May 28, 2013 ⚖ Case 7:2013cv00264/1085368 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 7:2013cv00264/1085368 involves Iglesia Bautista Tierra Prometida and Church Mutual Insurance Company. Filed on May 28, 2013, this case deals with Insurance based on 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract. Judge Micaela Alvarez is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Defendant has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Iglesia Bautista Tierra Prometida … | |
|
Texas, May 28, 2013 ⚖ Case 5:2013cv00447/631384 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 5:2013cv00447/631384, Isabel Garza and Amancio Garza files a suit against State Farm Lloyds. The filing date was May 28, 2013, and this case concerns Insurance under 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract. Presiding over the case is Judge Harry Lee Hudspeth. Both have requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Isabel Garza, ✅ Amancio Garza … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all