How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
M -> Maldonado...(click to open)
Maldonado, Antonio
Mayorkas, Alejandro
Mitchell, Ivory
Morgan, Kristina
Morgan, Shane
|
Texas, April 18, 2013 ⚖ Case 2:2013cv00281/143952 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 2:2013cv00281/143952, InterForm Incorporated files a suit against Staples Inc. The filing date was April 18, 2013, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Rodney Gilstrap. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, April 18, 2013 ⚖ Case 3:2013cv01528/231401 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the case 3:2013cv01528/231401 involves Indrani Ryali and John Kerry, Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and Lisa Kehl. Filed on April 18, 2013, this case pertains to Other Immigration Actions under 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti. Presiding over this matter is Judge Ed Kinkeade. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Indrani Ryali, ✅ John Kerry, ✅ Eric Holder, ✅ Janet Napolitano, ✅ Alejandro Mayorkas, ✅ Lisa Kehl … | |
|
Texas, April 17, 2013 ⚖ Case 2:2013cv00278/143895 The legal proceedings in case 2:2013cv00278/143895 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Iretha Williams Allen and Frank M Bufkin III, EN Smith Producing Inc, Buffco Production Inc and Edward N Smith, III. Filed on April 17, 2013, this case focuses on Torts to Land based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Iretha Williams Allen, ✅ Frank M Bufkin, ✅ Edward N Smith … | |
|
Texas, April 17, 2013 ⚖ Case 2:2013cv00279/143901 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 2:2013cv00279/143901, InterForm Incorporated files a suit against Newell Rubbermaid Incorporated, L P Sanford and Mitsubishi Pencil Company. The filing date was April 17, 2013, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Rodney Gilstrap. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ L P Sanford … | |
|
Texas, April 19, 2013 ⚖ Case 2:2013cv00283/143971 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 2:2013cv00283/143971, InterForm Incorporated files a suit against Sakura Color Products of America Corporation and Sakura Color Products Corporation. The filing date was April 19, 2013, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Rodney Gilstrap. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, April 19, 2013 ⚖ Case 2:2013cv00284/143972 At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 2:2013cv00284/143972 involves InterForm Incorporated and YAFA Pen Company. Filed on April 19, 2013, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, April 01, 2013 ⚖ Case 4:2013cv00910/1067000 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2013cv00910/1067000 entails Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Eduardo Campos Cuadra. The filing date is April 01, 2013, and this case deals with Cable/Satellite TV as per 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications Policy Act. Judge Nancy F. Atlas is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Eduardo Campos Cuadra … | |
|
Texas, April 01, 2013 ⚖ Case 1:2013cv00259/617851 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the case 1:2013cv00259/617851 involves Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Jarrell Temg Private Club Inc. and Eduardo Leon. Filed on April 01, 2013, this case pertains to Cable/Satellite TV under 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication. Presiding over this matter is Judge Sam Sparks. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Eduardo Leon … | |
|
Texas, April 01, 2013 ⚖ Case 2:2013cv00094/1067002 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 2:2013cv00094/1067002 entails Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Antonio Jamie Maldonado. The filing date is April 01, 2013, and this case deals with Cable/Satellite TV as per 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications Policy Act. Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Antonio Jamie Maldonado … | |
|
Texas, April 01, 2013 ⚖ Case 6:2013cv00106/617856 At the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the legal case 6:2013cv00106/617856 entails Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Kristina Morgan, Lake Brazos Steakhouse, Inc. and Shane Morgan. The filing date is April 01, 2013, and this case deals with Cable/Satellite TV as per 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications. Judge Walter S. Smith is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Kristina Morgan, ✅ Shane Morgan … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ira Klein
More Information |
United States of America |
| [Case # 2013cv00963/1068239], [Filed: April 01, 2013] [ Prisoner: Vacate Sentence§28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc ⚖ ] [Judge: David Hittner] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, April 01, 2013 ⚖ Case 6:2013cv00107/617859 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the case 6:2013cv00107/617859 involves Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Michael Paul Toups. Filed on April 01, 2013, this case pertains to Cable/Satellite TV under 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications. Presiding over this matter is Judge Walter S. Smith. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Michael Paul Toups … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ivory R. Mitchell
More Information |
Director TDCJ |
| [Case # 2013cv00089/144254], [Filed: May 01, 2013] [ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) ⚖ ] [Judge: Ron Clark, Zack Hawthorn] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, May 10, 2013 ⚖ Case 4:2013cv01380/1080220 In case 4:2013cv01380/1080220 within US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Isabel Sandoval brings a case against American Acryl, L.L.C., American Acryl L.P. and American Acryl NA, L.L.C. Filed on May 10, 2013, this legal matter relates to Civil Rights: Jobs as per 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment). The presiding judge is Lynn N. Hughes, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Isabel Sandoval … | |
|
Texas, May 10, 2013 ⚖ Case 1:2013cv00387/628136 In case 1:2013cv00387/628136 within US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Ivera Medical Corporation brings a case against New Alliance of Independent Medical Distributors, Inc. and Amtec Medical, Inc. Filed on May 10, 2013, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement. The presiding judge is Sam Sparks, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, May 10, 2013 ⚖ Case 2:2013cv00393/144443 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 2:2013cv00393/144443, Institute For Information Industry files a suit against Google Inc. The filing date was May 10, 2013, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Both have requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, April 01, 2013 ⚖ Case 3:2013cv01328/230713 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Innovative Sports Management Inc and Jose Luis Perez are involved in case 3:2013cv01328/230713. Filed on April 01, 2013, this legal matter focuses on Cable/Satellite TV under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question. Judge Sam A Lindsay is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ Jose Luis Perez … | |
|
Texas, May 10, 2013 ⚖ Case 7:2013cv00221/1080194 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 7:2013cv00221/1080194 comprises Irasema Garcia and Juan J. Garcia and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Filed on May 10, 2013, this case concerns Real Property: Other based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract. Judge Randy Crane is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irasema Garcia, ✅ Juan J. Garcia … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Isaac Kelvin Allen
More Information |
John Fox |
| [Case # 2013cv00296/144482], [Filed: May 10, 2013] [ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa ⚖ ] [Judge: Ron Clark, Keith F. Giblin] ✅ John Fox >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, April 23, 2013 ⚖ Case 2:2013cv00297/144048 The legal proceedings in case 2:2013cv00297/144048 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve InterForm Incorporated and MEGA Brands Incorporated, MEGA Brands International and MEGA Brands America Incorporated. Filed on April 23, 2013, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Isabel Flores-Ogaz
More Information |
USA |
| [Case # 2013cv00350/231765], [Filed: April 29, 2013] [ Prisoner: Vacate Sentence§28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence ⚖ ] [Judge: John McBryde] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, April 29, 2013 ⚖ Case 5:2013cv00351/624914 At the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the legal case 5:2013cv00351/624914 involves Ismael Espinoza, Jr., Michael J. Scott, P.C. and Michael J. Scott, P.C., Ismael Espinoza, Jr. Filed on April 29, 2013, this case deals with Consumer Credit based on 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act. Judge Xavier Rodriguez is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ismael Espinoza, ✅ Michael J. Scott, ✅ Michael J. Scott, ✅ Ismael Espinoza … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all