How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, April 15, 2013 ⚖ Case 4:2013cv01069/1071492 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2013cv01069/1071492 entails Isaac N Okpechi and Irfan N Moosa, Salman Bhatty, Zafar N Moosa, Eric S Miller and J&D Restaurant Group, LLC. The filing date is April 15, 2013, and this case deals with Civil Rights: Jobs as per 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights. Judge Lynn N. Hughes is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Isaac N Okpechi, ✅ Irfan N Moosa, ✅ Salman Bhatty, ✅ Zafar N Moosa, ✅ Eric S Miller … | |
|
Texas, April 02, 2013 ⚖ Case 3:2013cv01360/230794 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the case 3:2013cv01360/230794 involves Ismael H Padilla and Eddie Baker, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, C Currie and Brad Livingston. Filed on April 02, 2013, this case pertains to Prisoner: Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act. Presiding over this matter is Judge Jane J Boyle, David L Horan. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ismael H Padilla, ✅ Eddie Baker, ✅ C Currie, ✅ Brad Livingston … | |
|
Texas, April 02, 2013 ⚖ Case 3:2013cv01355/230777 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the case 3:2013cv01355/230777 involves Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Ramon Cerda, Mariscos Del Golfo, Inc. and Gonzalo Cerda. Filed on April 02, 2013, this case pertains to Cable/Satellite TV under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question. Presiding over this matter is Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ramon Cerda, ✅ Gonzalo Cerda … | |
|
Texas, April 02, 2013 ⚖ Case 6:2013cv00109/618493 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Eduardo Leon and Restaurante Mexicano Grill Inc. are involved in case 6:2013cv00109/618493. Filed on April 02, 2013, this legal matter focuses on Cable/Satellite TV under 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications. Judge Walter S. Smith is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ Eduardo Leon … | |
|
Texas, February 28, 2013 ⚖ Case 5:2013cv00155/610136 At the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the legal case 5:2013cv00155/610136 involves Inelda Tolliver and David Tolliver, BSI Financial Services, Inc. and BSI Financial Services, Inc., David Tolliver and Inelda Tolliver. Filed on February 28, 2013, this case deals with Real Property: Foreclosure based on 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure. Judge David Ezra is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Inelda Tolliver, ✅ David Tolliver, ✅ David Tolliver, ✅ Inelda Tolliver … | |
|
Texas, April 02, 2013 ⚖ Case 1:2013cv00265/618506 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the case 1:2013cv00265/618506 involves Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Rufino Moreno Cornejo. Filed on April 02, 2013, this case pertains to Cable/Satellite TV under 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication. Presiding over this matter is Judge Sam Sparks. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Rufino Moreno Cornejo … | |
|
Texas, April 02, 2013 ⚖ Case 1:2013cv00263/618487 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Hillsboro LS, Inc. and Daniel W. Lopez are involved in case 1:2013cv00263/618487. Filed on April 02, 2013, this legal matter focuses on Cable/Satellite TV under 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication. Judge Sam Sparks is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ Daniel W. Lopez … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ignacio Luna-Leiva
More Information |
Keith Hall |
| [Case # 2013cv00021/230773], [Filed: April 02, 2013] [ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ⚖ ] [Judge: Sam R Cummings] ✅ Keith Hall >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, April 02, 2013 ⚖ Case 3:2013cv01358/230781 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Jose Sanchez, Los Tres Sanchez, Inc., Aniceto Sanchez and Noe Sanchez are involved in case 3:2013cv01358/230781. Filed on April 02, 2013, this legal matter focuses on Cable/Satellite TV under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question. Judge A. Joe Fish is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ Jose Sanchez, ✅ Aniceto Sanchez, ✅ Noe Sanchez … | |
|
Texas, April 02, 2013 ⚖ Case 4:2013cv00919/1067283 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2013cv00919/1067283 entails Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Syed Raziuddin and Ricos Mexican Restaurant #6, Inc. The filing date is April 02, 2013, and this case deals with Cable/Satellite TV as per 47 U.S.C. § 0521. Judge David Hittner is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Syed Raziuddin … | |
|
Texas, April 09, 2013 ⚖ Case 4:2013cv01019/1069734 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2013cv01019/1069734, INEOS USA, LLC files a suit against Syed Kamal Haq, Mushfiqur Rahman and Nazmul Kabir. The filing date was April 09, 2013, and this case concerns Other Statutory Actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action. Presiding over the case is Judge Sim Lake. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Syed Kamal Haq, ✅ Mushfiqur Rahman, ✅ Nazmul Kabir … | |
|
Texas, April 10, 2013 ⚖ Case 4:2013cv01036/1070233 The legal proceedings in case 4:2013cv01036/1070233 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve Imad Baba, Gener8 Entertainment, LLC, George Zabaneh and Nidal Baba and J&J Sports Productions, Inc. Filed on April 10, 2013, this case focuses on Contract: Other based on 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal. Judge Ewing Werlein is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Imad Baba, ✅ George Zabaneh, ✅ Nidal Baba … | |
|
Texas, April 10, 2013 ⚖ Case 4:2013cv00299/231108 At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2013cv00299/231108 entails Issac J. Dow and Carolyn W Colvin. The filing date is April 10, 2013, and this case deals with Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI as per 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID). Judge John McBryde is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Issac J. Dow, ✅ Carolyn W Colvin … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all