How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ignacio Olvera
More Information |
United States of America |
| [Case # 2013cv00034/605986], [Filed: February 08, 2013] [ Prisoner: Vacate Sentence§28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc ⚖ ] [Judge: Philip R. Martinez] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, February 08, 2013 ⚖ Case 1:2013cv00112/605726 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 1:2013cv00112/605726, Imelda Cantu files a suit against 360Training.com, Inc. The filing date was February 08, 2013, and this case concerns Civil Rights: Jobs under 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Civil Actions for False Claims. Presiding over the case is Judge Sam Sparks. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Imelda Cantu … | |
|
Texas, January 25, 2013 ⚖ Case 6:2013cv00100/142092 US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 6:2013cv00100/142092 comprises Ipolito Campos and Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert Mueller, U.S. Department of Justice and Office of Information Policy. Filed on January 25, 2013, this case concerns Prisoner: Civil Rights based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights. Judge Judith K. Guthrie, Michael H. Schneider is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ipolito Campos, ✅ Robert Mueller … | |
|
Texas, February 08, 2013 ⚖ Case 1:2013cv00118/605768 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 1:2013cv00118/605768, Intellectual Ventures II LLC files a suit against CenturyLink, Inc., CenturyTel Broadband Services, LLC, Embarq Corp., Qwest Communications International, Inc., Qwest Corp. and Savvis, Inc. The filing date was February 08, 2013, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Lee Yeakel. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, October 24, 2012 ⚖ Case 3:2012cv04295/224634 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ITC Girl LLC and The Cincinnati Insurance Company are involved in case 3:2012cv04295/224634. Filed on October 24, 2012, this legal matter focuses on Insurance under 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract. Judge Sam A Lindsay is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. | |
|
Texas, October 24, 2012 ⚖ Case 5:2012cv01017/587785 In case 5:2012cv01017/587785 within US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Irene Bertrand brings a case against HOVG, LLC. Filed on October 24, 2012, this legal matter relates to Other Statutory Actions as per 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act. The presiding judge is Fred Biery, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irene Bertrand … | |
|
Texas, February 08, 2013 ⚖ Case 1:2013cv00116/605756 The legal proceedings in case 1:2013cv00116/605756 at US District Court for the Western District of Texas involve Intellectual Ventures II LLC, AT&T Communications of Texas, LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Video Services, Inc., SBC Internet Services, Inc. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and AT&T Communications of Texas, LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc., AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Video Services, Inc., SBC Internet Services, Inc. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Intellectual Ventures II LLC. Filed on February 08, 2013, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Lee Yeakel is presiding, and it's notable that Both have requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, February 08, 2013 ⚖ Case 1:2013cv00119/605777 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 1:2013cv00119/605777, Intellectual Ventures II LLC files a suit against McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, LLC, PaeTec Communications, Inc., Paetec Holding Corporation, Texas Windstream, Inc., Valor Telecommunications of Texas, LLC, Windstream Communications Kerrville, LLC, Windstream Communications Telecom, LLC, Windstre. The filing date was February 08, 2013, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Lee Yeakel. Both have requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, March 05, 2013 ⚖ Case 5:2013cv00050/229710 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Ismael Chavez Molina J Salud and Dalby Correctional Facility Health Service, Dalby Correctional Facility Supervisor Quintana and Dalby Correctional Employees 1-100 are involved in case 5:2013cv00050/229710. Filed on March 05, 2013, this legal matter focuses on Prisoner: Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights. Judge Sam R Cummings is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ Ismael Chavez Molina J Salud, ✅ Dalby Correctional Facility Supervisor Quintana, ✅ Dalby Correctional Employees - … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ivan Omar Avalos
More Information |
Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Janet Napolitano |
| [Case # 2013cv00022/602466], [Filed: January 22, 2013] [ Other Immigration Actions§28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision ⚖ ] [Judge: Philip R. Martinez] ✅ Eric H. Holder, ✅ Janet Napolitano >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, March 04, 2013 ⚖ Case 3:2013cv00942/229634 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the case 3:2013cv00942/229634 involves Industrial Screw Conveyors and Eichleay Engineers Inc and John Sakamoto. Filed on March 04, 2013, this case pertains to Contract: Other under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Presiding over this matter is Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Industrial Screw Conveyors, ✅ John Sakamoto … | |
|
Texas, February 19, 2013 ⚖ Case 5:2013cv00113/607362 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the case 5:2013cv00113/607362 involves Irma Aura Urby De Weston and US Bank National Association, as Trustee for the C-Bass Mortgage Loan Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2006-CB8. Filed on February 19, 2013, this case pertains to Contract: Other under 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract. Presiding over this matter is Judge Orlando L. Garcia. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Aura Urby De Weston … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all