How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, January 23, 2012 ⚖ Case 4:2012cv00207/946989 The legal proceedings in case 4:2012cv00207/946989 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve Integrated Management Systems, Inc. and Snehasish Maity and Advent Global Solutions, Inc. Filed on January 23, 2012, this case focuses on Other Contract based on 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt is presiding, and it's notable that Both have requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Snehasish Maity … | |
|
Texas, January 23, 2012 ⚖ Case 3:2012cv00021/947109 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 3:2012cv00021/947109, Irene M Phillion, Kathleen A Kirst and Jacqueline Garrett files a suit against Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. The filing date was January 23, 2012, and this case concerns Other Personal Injury under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Presiding over the case is Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt. The Defendant has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irene M Phillion, ✅ Kathleen A Kirst, ✅ Jacqueline Garrett … | |
|
Texas, January 07, 2013 ⚖ Case 5:2013cv00013/599963 The legal proceedings in case 5:2013cv00013/599963 at US District Court for the Western District of Texas involve Irene Bertrand and Cellco Partnership. Filed on January 07, 2013, this case focuses on Other Statutory Actions based on 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Judge Xavier Rodriguez is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irene Bertrand, ✅ Cellco Partnership … | |
|
Texas, January 11, 2013 ⚖ Case 4:2013cv00089/1043894 The legal proceedings in case 4:2013cv00089/1043894 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company and David Bush, Olga Bush, Renee Cassese and Sylinda Kenyon. Filed on January 11, 2013, this case focuses on Insurance based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment. Judge David Hittner is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ David Bush, ✅ Olga Bush, ✅ Renee Cassese, ✅ Sylinda Kenyon … | |
|
Texas, January 04, 2013 ⚖ Case 3:2013cv00046/227283 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Indemnity Insurance Corporation and Arcababa, Inc. are involved in case 3:2013cv00046/227283. Filed on January 04, 2013, this legal matter focuses on Insurance under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract. Judge Jane J Boyle is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. | |
|
Texas, December 19, 2012 ⚖ Case 2:2012cv00809/141436 At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 2:2012cv00809/141436 involves Ingeniador, LLC and McKesson Corporation. Filed on December 19, 2012, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, December 19, 2012 ⚖ Case 2:2012cv00805/141432 At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 2:2012cv00805/141432 involves Ingeniador, LLC and Adobe Systems Incorporated. Filed on December 19, 2012, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that Both have requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, December 19, 2012 ⚖ Case 2:2012cv00808/141435 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 2:2012cv00808/141435, Ingeniador, LLC files a suit against GE Healthcare, Inc. The filing date was December 19, 2012, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Rodney Gilstrap. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, December 19, 2012 ⚖ Case 2:2012cv00811/141438 The legal proceedings in case 2:2012cv00811/141438 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Ingeniador, LLC and MedPlus and Quest Diagnostics, Inc. Filed on December 19, 2012, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is presiding, and it's notable that Both have requested a jury trial. |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all