How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, October 29, 2012 ⚖ Case 6:2012cv00821/140568 In case 6:2012cv00821/140568 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, IP Co., LLC d/b/a Intus IQ brings a case against Crestron Electronics, Inc. Filed on October 29, 2012, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Leonard Davis, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
Irma Patino and Rudy Patino-Rico
More Information |
Bank of America, N.A., As Successor By Merger To BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. |
| [Case # 2012cv01098/592477], [Filed: November 19, 2012] [ Real Property: Other§28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure ⚖ ] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, November 23, 2012 ⚖ Case 2:2012mc00574/1031955 Here's the deal—Imelda Tovar is going against John McHugh. Case number case 2:2012mc00574/1031955, started on November 23, 2012. It's about Other before Judge B. Janice Ellington, Nelva Gonzales Ramos. More Information about >>> ✅ Imelda Tovar, ✅ John McHugh … | |
|
Texas, November 02, 2012 ⚖ Case 7:2012cv00410/1025887 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 7:2012cv00410/1025887, Irma Gloria Garza files a suit against ASI Lloyds. The filing date was November 02, 2012, and this case concerns Insurance under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Presiding over the case is Judge Randy Crane. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Gloria Garza … | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| Innovative Automation LLC | Spotify USA Inc |
| [Case # 2012cv00883/140951], [Filed: November 16, 2012] [ Patent§15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement ⚖ ] [jury demanded by Both] >>> More Information |
|
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Israel Banda
More Information |
USA |
| [Case # 2012cv04677/225583], [Filed: November 16, 2012] [ Prisoner: Vacate Sentence§28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence ⚖ ] [Judge: Ed Kinkeade] >>> More Information |
|
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
Innovative Automation
More Information |
Audible, Inc., On-Demand Publishing, LLC d/b/a CreateSpace and Amazon.com, Inc. |
| [Case # 2012cv00881/140948], [Filed: November 16, 2012] [ Patent§28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement ⚖ ] [jury demanded by Both] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, November 16, 2012 ⚖ Case 4:2012cv00725/140952 Within the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, Innovative Communications, LLC brings forward a case against Texas Instruments Incorporated in Case Number case 4:2012cv00725/140952. Initiated on November 16, 2012, this legal matter pertains to an Patent issue based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. It's important to mention that Plaintiff has requested a jury for this case. | |
|
Texas, November 16, 2012 ⚖ Case 6:2012cv00882/140950 Within the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Innovative Automation LLC brings forward a case against Apple, Inc. in Case Number case 6:2012cv00882/140950. Initiated on November 16, 2012, this legal matter pertains to an Patent issue based on 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement. It's important to mention that Plaintiff has requested a jury for this case. | |
|
Texas, November 16, 2012 ⚖ Case 7:2012cv00442/1030657 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 7:2012cv00442/1030657 involves Irma Cavazos and Allstate Texas Lloyds, Inc. Filed on November 16, 2012, this case deals with Insurance based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship). Judge Randy Crane is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Defendant has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Cavazos … | |
|
Texas, November 09, 2012 ⚖ Case 2:2012cv00709/140781 In case 2:2012cv00709/140781 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. brings a case against Johnson Health Tech North America, Inc. Filed on November 09, 2012, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. The presiding judge is Rodney Gilstrap, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all