Case Search – Texas (TX)

How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas

You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:

1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.

2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.

3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.

4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.

Steps to Perform a Search:

1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.

Texas Lawyers Directory


Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!


Participant Index
A -> Al-Bassam...(click to open)   Al-Bassam, Mahdi
  Alford, Richard
  Astrue, Michael
D -> Daher...(click to open)   Daher, Iyad
  Division, Correctional
G -> Gorsuch...(click to open)   Gorsuch, Keith
H -> Hall...(click to open)   Hall, Keith
K -> Kroll...(click to open)   Kroll, Gene
L -> Luera...(click to open)   Luera, Isaiah
M -> Martinez...(click to open)   Martinez, Itix
  Masters, Kelvin
  Mayo, Lowry
  Monjaras, Isabel
  Morales, Isael
O -> Owhib...(click to open)   Owhib, Ibrahim
R -> Reynoso-Reyes...(click to open)   Reynoso-Reyes, Ivan
  Rocha, Ignacio
S -> Smith...(click to open)   Smith, Ideria
  Sutton, Warden
T -> Tompkins...(click to open)   Tompkins, Aaron
W -> Wallace...(click to open)   Wallace, Darren

Texas,   September 04, 2012
Case 1:2012cv00171/1007532
At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 1:2012cv00171/1007532 involves Itix X Martinez and Starkey Laboratories, Inc. and Express Services Professionals. Filed on September 04, 2012, this case deals with Employment based on 29 U.S.C. § 2601. Judge Hilda G Tagle is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Itix X Martinez 
Texas,   September 10, 2012
Case 4:2012cv02705/1009213
In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 4:2012cv02705/1009213 involves Iyad Daher and Mahdi Al-Bassam. Filed on September 10, 2012, this case pertains to Other Contract under 28 U.S.C. § 1446. Presiding over this matter is Judge Ewing Werlein. There is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Iyad Daher, ✅ Mahdi Al-Bassam 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ibrahim K Owhib
More Information
Keith Hall
[Case # 2012cv00057/222917], [Filed: September 10, 2012]
[ General§28 U.S.C. § 2241 ⚖ ]
[Judge: Sam R Cummings, E. Scott Frost]
✅ Keith Hall >>> More Information
Texas,   October 02, 2012
Case 2:2012cv00624/140061
At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 2:2012cv00624/140061 involves InMotion Imagery Technology and Dell Inc. Filed on October 02, 2012, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that Both have requested a jury trial.
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ideria Wayne Smith
More Information
Keith E Gorsuch, Aaron J Tompkins, Richard K Alford, Gene A Kroll, Darren B Wallace, Kelvin D Masters and Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
[Case # 2012cv00475/140078], [Filed: October 02, 2012]
[ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) ⚖ ]
[Judge: Ron Clark, Keith F. Giblin]
✅ Keith E Gorsuch, ✅ Aaron J Tompkins, ✅ Richard K Alford, ✅ Gene A Kroll, ✅ Darren B Wallace, ✅ Kelvin D Masters, ✅ Correctional Institutions Division >>> More Information
Texas,   October 01, 2012
Case 3:2012cv03951/223727
In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the case 3:2012cv03951/223727 involves Ignacio Rocha and Bank of America NA and Federal National Mortgage Association. Filed on October 01, 2012, this case pertains to Real Property: Other under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal. Presiding over this matter is Judge A. Joe Fish. There is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Ignacio Rocha 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Isaiah Luera
More Information
Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
[Case # 2012cv00614/139951], [Filed: September 19, 2012]
[ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) ⚖ ]
[Judge: Rodney Gilstrap, Roy S Payne]
✅ Correctional Institutions Division >>> More Information
Texas,   September 19, 2012
Case 2:2012cv00290/1012450
In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 2:2012cv00290/1012450, Isael Morales files a suit against Producers Assistance Corporation. The filing date was September 19, 2012, and this case concerns Labor: Other under 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Presiding over the case is Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Isael Morales 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Isaiah Luera
More Information
Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
[Case # 2012cv00452/139866], [Filed: September 19, 2012]
[ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) ⚖ ]
[Judge: Zack Hawthorn, Thad Heartfield]
✅ Correctional Institutions Division >>> More Information
Texas,   October 05, 2012
Case 7:2012cv00169/223991
In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the case 7:2012cv00169/223991 involves Invacare Corporation and Med Care Medical Supply of North Texas Inc and Lowry K. Mayo. Filed on October 05, 2012, this case pertains to Contract: Recovery/Enforcement under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Presiding over this matter is Judge Reed C O'Connor. There is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Lowry K. Mayo 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ivan Reynoso-Reyes
More Information
Warden Michael Sutton
[Case # 2012cv00242/579143], [Filed: September 07, 2012]
[ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa ⚖ ]
[Judge: Walter S. Smith]
✅ Warden Michael Sutton >>> More Information
Texas,   September 07, 2012
Case 4:2012cv02689/1008709
In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 4:2012cv02689/1008709 involves Isabel Monjaras and Michael J. Astrue. Filed on September 07, 2012, this case pertains to Disability Insurance under 42 U.S.C. § 416. Presiding over this matter is Judge Frances H Stacy, Ewing Werlein. There is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Isabel Monjaras, ✅ Michael J. Astrue 

2 thoughts on “Case Search – Texas (TX)”

  1. Good Morning
    I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
    I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
    Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
    In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
    The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
    RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
    Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
    Comment on the No comment

  2. RE- LARBI SEMIANI
    I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
    I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
    I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
    Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
    thanks to all

Comments are closed.