Case Search – Texas (TX)

How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas

You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:

1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.

2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.

3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.

4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.

Steps to Perform a Search:

1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.

Texas Lawyers Directory


Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!


Participant Index
A -> Associates...(click to open)   Associates, Pequod
B -> Begay...(click to open)   Begay, Ivan
C -> Cantu...(click to open)   Cantu, Carlos
  Cantu, Ninfa
F -> Facility...(click to open)   Facility, Giles
  Foxworth, Todd
G -> Garza...(click to open)   Garza, Maria
  Gonzalez, Annette
  Gonzalez, Robert
  Gracia, Hector
H -> Harrison...(click to open)   Harrison, Jon
  Hernandez, Isaac
  Hudson, Isaac
J -> Jules...(click to open)   Jules, Janice
  Jules, Niktalya
M -> Mazariegos...(click to open)   Mazariegos, Iparco
  Mejia, Dina
  Mitchell, Ivory
P -> Peck...(click to open)   Peck, David
R -> Rodriguez...(click to open)   Rodriguez, Roldan
S -> Saenz...(click to open)   Saenz, Blanca
  Schmidt, Irma
  Schmidt, John
  Sheeley, Kay

Texas,   August 07, 2012
Case 6:2012cv00205/572964
In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the case 6:2012cv00205/572964 involves Ivory R. Mitchell and TDCJ-CID, Kay Sheeley and Jon C. Harrison. Filed on August 07, 2012, this case pertains to Prisoner: Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights. Presiding over this matter is Judge Jeffrey C. Manske, Walter S. Smith. There is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Ivory R. Mitchell, ✅ Kay Sheeley, ✅ Jon C. Harrison 
Texas,   September 25, 2012
Case 4:2012cv02876/1014169
In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Intership Navigation Co., Ltd. and Haratio Shipping Co., Ltd. and Oceaneering International, Inc., Pequod Associates, Ltd. and Onego Shipping & Chartering BV are involved in case 4:2012cv02876/1014169. Filed on September 25, 2012, this legal matter focuses on Contract: Marine under 46 U.S.C. § 1300 Carriage of Goods by Sea Act. Judge Nancy F. Atlas is presiding, and no jury trial is requested.
More Information about >>> ✅ Pequod Associates 
Texas,   September 27, 2012
Case 7:2012cv00357/1015167
In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 7:2012cv00357/1015167, Irma Schmidt, Blanca Saenz, Maria R. Garza, Roldan Rodriguez, Dina Mejia, Robert D. Gonzalez, Annette Gonzalez, Hector Gracia, Carlos Cantu, Ninfa Cantu and John Schmidt files a suit against ASI Lloyds, TSI Adjusters, Inc., Advanced Claims Concepts and IAS Claims Concepts. The filing date was September 27, 2012, and this case concerns Insurance under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract. Presiding over the case is Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa. The Defendant has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Schmidt, ✅ Blanca Saenz, ✅ Maria R. Garza, ✅ Roldan Rodriguez, ✅ Dina Mejia, ✅ Robert D. Gonzalez, ✅ Annette Gonzalez, ✅ Hector Gracia, ✅ Carlos Cantu, ✅ Ninfa Cantu, ✅ John Schmidt 
Texas,   August 24, 2012
Case 5:2012cv00147/222394
In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Iparco Sandoval Mazariegos and Giles W. Dalby Correctional Facility, Health Service of Giles W. Dalby C.F. and Unknown DOE-1-100 are involved in case 5:2012cv00147/222394. Filed on August 24, 2012, this legal matter focuses on Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Judge Nancy M Koenig is presiding, and no jury trial is requested.
More Information about >>> ✅ Iparco Sandoval Mazariegos, ✅ Giles W. Dalby Correctional Facility 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ivan Ray Begay
More Information
Warden FCI Seagoville
[Case # 2012cv03380/222414], [Filed: August 24, 2012]
[ General§28 U.S.C. § 2241 ⚖ ]
[Judge: Sam A Lindsay]
>>> More Information
Texas,   August 03, 2012
Case 3:2012cv02646/221175
In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the case 3:2012cv02646/221175 involves ID Technology LLC and Paul Leibinger Numbering Machine LP. Filed on August 03, 2012, this case pertains to Other Contract under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Presiding over this matter is Judge Jane J Boyle. There is no demand for a jury trial.
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Isaac Hudson
More Information
Jr
Niktalya Jules, City of Orange Police Department, Janice Jules and David L. Peck
[Case # 2012cv00470/140001], [Filed: September 27, 2012]
[ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) ⚖ ]
[Judge: Marcia A. Crone, Keith F. Giblin]
✅ Niktalya Jules, ✅ Janice Jules, ✅ David L. Peck >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Isaac Felipe Hernandez
More Information
Todd A Foxworth
[Case # 2012cv00623/222863], [Filed: September 04, 2012]
[ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ]
[Judge: Terry R Means]
✅ Todd A Foxworth >>> More Information

2 thoughts on “Case Search – Texas (TX)”

  1. Good Morning
    I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
    I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
    Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
    In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
    The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
    RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
    Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
    Comment on the No comment

  2. RE- LARBI SEMIANI
    I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
    I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
    I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
    Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
    thanks to all

Comments are closed.