How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, May 08, 2012 ⚖ Case 4:2012cv00274/136988 Within the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. brings forward a case against AudioVox Electronics Corporation in Case Number case 4:2012cv00274/136988. Initiated on May 08, 2012, this legal matter pertains to an Patent issue based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. It's important to mention that Plaintiff has requested a jury for this case. | |
|
Texas, April 25, 2012 ⚖ Case 2:2012cv00122/971300 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Isaac Matthews and J M Garcia, Asst Regional Director, M Jones, Guard and R Pawelek, Warden are involved in case 2:2012cv00122/971300. Filed on April 25, 2012, this legal matter focuses on Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Judge B. Janice Ellington, Nelva Gonzales Ramos is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ Isaac Matthews, ✅ J M Garcia, ✅ Asst Regional Director, ✅ M Jones, ✅ R Pawelek … | |
|
Texas, July 08, 2010 ⚖ Case 5:2010cv00112/123868 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Interstate Battery System International Inc and INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF AMERICA, INC. and Federal Insurance Company are involved in case 5:2010cv00112/123868. Filed on July 08, 2010, this legal matter focuses on Insurance under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge David Folsom is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. | |
|
Texas, May 08, 2012 ⚖ Case 4:2012cv00277/136992 In case 4:2012cv00277/136992, Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. takes legal action against Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc. at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Filed on May 08, 2012, this case revolves around a Patent issue under 35 U.S.C. § 271. It's notable that Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case. | |
|
Texas, May 07, 2012 ⚖ Case 5:2012cv00435/553975 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 5:2012cv00435/553975, Innova Hospital - San Antonio, L.P. files a suit against Aetna Life Insurance Company and Aetna Health Inc. The filing date was May 07, 2012, and this case concerns Labor: E.R.I.S.A. under 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal - ERISA. Presiding over the case is Judge Orlando L. Garcia. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Innova Hospital - San Antonio … | |
|
Texas, May 18, 2012 ⚖ Case 1:2012cv00446/556940 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Innovative Aftermarket Systems, L.P. and Automobile Protection Corporation are involved in case 1:2012cv00446/556940. Filed on May 18, 2012, this legal matter focuses on Trademark under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment. Judge Lee Yeakel is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. | |
|
Texas, May 23, 2012 ⚖ Case 3:2012cv01607/218575 The legal proceedings in case 3:2012cv01607/218575 at US District Court for the Northern District of Texas involve Innova Hospital San Antonio LP and Victory Medical Center Houston, L.P. and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Health Care Service Corporation of Illinois State Pac,. Filed on May 23, 2012, this case focuses on Contract: Insurance based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract. Judge Reed C O'Connor is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Blue Cross, ✅ Blue Cross, ✅ Blue Cross, ✅ Blue Cross … | |
|
Texas, May 14, 2012 ⚖ Case 3:2012cv01497/218230 At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2012cv01497/218230 involves Innova Pure Water Inc and Move Collective LLC. Filed on May 14, 2012, this case deals with Other Contract based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Reed C O'Connor is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ivory Ray Mitchell
More Information |
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID |
| [Case # 2012cv00353/137415], [Filed: May 29, 2012] [ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ] [Judge: Judith K. Guthrie, Michael H. Schneider] ✅ Rick Thaler >>> More Information |
|
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all