Case Search – Texas (TX)

How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas

You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:

1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.

2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.

3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.

4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.

Steps to Perform a Search:

1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.

Texas Lawyers Directory


Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!


Participant Index
A -> Antonio...(click to open)   Antonio, Innova
B -> Baggett...(click to open)   Baggett, Denice
  Bildner, Barbara
  Butler, Verna
D -> Dondero...(click to open)   Dondero, Jim
F -> Fund...(click to open)   Fund, Benefit
L -> Lewis...(click to open)   Lewis, Darcy
  Lewis, Wayne
S -> Santos...(click to open)   Santos, Isaias
  Stapleton, Regina
T -> Thaler...(click to open)   Thaler, Rick
  Toups, Ivabel
W -> Williams...(click to open)   Williams, Ivery

Texas,   February 22, 2012
Case 1:2012cv00173/535868
US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 1:2012cv00173/535868 comprises iKey, Ltd. and iKeyboard, Inc. Filed on February 22, 2012, this case concerns Trademark based on 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement. Judge Lee Yeakel is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
Texas,   March 12, 2012
Case 4:2012cv00793/959433
In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Isaias Santos, III and Ft. Bend County Jail are involved in case 4:2012cv00793/959433. Filed on March 12, 2012, this legal matter focuses on Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Judge Melinda Harmon is presiding, and no jury trial is requested.
More Information about >>> ✅ Isaias Santos 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ivery Treveno Williams
More Information
Rick Thaler, Director, TDCJ - CID
[Case # 2012cv00837/216391], [Filed: March 21, 2012]
[ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ]
[Judge: Barbara M.G. Lynn]
✅ Rick Thaler >>> More Information
Texas,   March 21, 2012
Case 2:2012cv00151/135944
The legal proceedings in case 2:2012cv00151/135944 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Inmotion Imagery Technologies LLC and Netflix Inc. Filed on March 21, 2012, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Rodney Gilstrap, Roy S Payne is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Texas,   March 09, 2012
Case 6:2012cv00118/135589
The legal proceedings in case 6:2012cv00118/135589 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve ISwitch, LLC and Research In Motion Corporation, Cincinnati Bell Inc., Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC and Research in Motion Ltd. Filed on March 09, 2012, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Leonard Davis is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Ivabel Toups
More Information
Denice Baggett
More Information
Verna Butler
More Information
Barbara Bildner and Regina Stapleton
More Information
American Medical Systems, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health & Urology and Gynecare
[Case # 12-cv-00845/800438], [Filed: March 22, 2012]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Texas,   March 09, 2012
Case 6:2012cv00119/135594
At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 6:2012cv00119/135594 involves ISwitch, LLC and T-Mobile USA, Inc., Research in Motion Ltd. and Research In Motion Corporation. Filed on March 09, 2012, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Leonard Davis is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Ivabel Toups
More Information
Denice Baggett
More Information
Verna Butler
More Information
Barbara Bildner and Regina Stapleton
More Information
American Medical Systems, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health & Urology and Gynecare
[Case # 12-cv-00845/800365], [Filed: March 22, 2012]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Texas,   March 23, 2012
Case 5:2012cv00271/543394
US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 5:2012cv00271/543394 comprises Integrated Distribution Service, Inc. and H.E.B., Inc. and Chameleon Beverage Company, Inc. Filed on March 23, 2012, this case concerns Contract: Other based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Judge Xavier Rodriguez is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
Texas,   March 23, 2012
Case 3:2012cv00875/216453
In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, International Fidelity Insurance Company and Jim Dondero, Wayne Lewis, Andrew Merrick Homes, LLC, Darcy Lewis and Andrew Merrick Construction, LLC are involved in case 3:2012cv00875/216453. Filed on March 23, 2012, this legal matter focuses on Other Contract under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Jorge A Solis is presiding, and no jury trial is requested.
More Information about >>> ✅ Jim Dondero, ✅ Wayne Lewis, ✅ Darcy Lewis 
Texas,   March 19, 2012
Case 3:2012cv00084/960598
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 3:2012cv00084/960598 comprises Indian Beach Property Owners Association, Inc and City Of Galveston. Filed on March 19, 2012, this case concerns Other Civil Rights based on 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Judge John R Froeschner, Kenneth M. Hoyt is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
Texas,   March 19, 2012
Case 5:2012cv00258/541767
In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 5:2012cv00258/541767, Innova Hospital - San Antonio, L.P. files a suit against UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company. The filing date was March 19, 2012, and this case concerns Insurance under 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract. Presiding over the case is Judge Orlando L. Garcia. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Innova Hospital - San Antonio 
Texas,   March 16, 2012
Case 5:2012cv00254/541522
At the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the legal case 5:2012cv00254/541522 involves Innova Hospital - San Antonio, L.P., Principal Life Insurance Company and Principal Life Insurance Company, Innova Hospital - San Antonio, L.P. Filed on March 16, 2012, this case deals with Insurance based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract. Judge Orlando L. Garcia is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Innova Hospital - San Antonio, ✅ Innova Hospital - San Antonio 
Texas,   March 29, 2012
Case 3:2012cv00973/216676
In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the case 3:2012cv00973/216676 involves IBEW-NECA Southwestern Health and Benefit Fund and Electrical Technologies Inc. Filed on March 29, 2012, this case pertains to Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 under 29 U.S.C. § 1132. Presiding over this matter is Judge A. Joe Fish. There is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Benefit Fund 

2 thoughts on “Case Search – Texas (TX)”

  1. Good Morning
    I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
    I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
    Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
    In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
    The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
    RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
    Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
    Comment on the No comment

  2. RE- LARBI SEMIANI
    I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
    I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
    I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
    Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
    thanks to all

Comments are closed.