How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, January 18, 2012 ⚖ Case 1:2012cv00052/529310 In case 1:2012cv00052/529310 within US District Court for the Western District of Texas, InduSoft, Inc., InduSoft Desenvolvimento de Software Ltda. and InduSoft Business Development, Inc. brings a case against Marcos V. Taccolini, Tatsoft Informatica, Ltda., Tatsoft, LLC, Eric Vigiani and Does 1 - 20. Filed on January 18, 2012, this legal matter relates to Copyright as per 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement. The presiding judge is Lee Yeakel, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ InduSoft Desenvolvimento de Software Ltda., ✅ Marcos V. Taccolini, ✅ Tatsoft Informatica, ✅ Eric Vigiani, ✅ Does - … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Isaul Garcia Suarez
More Information |
G.E.O. Group, U.S. Attorney General, United States Of America, Warden RCDC III and Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| [Case # 2012cv00018/530324], [Filed: January 24, 2012] [ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa ⚖ ] [Judge: Robert A. Junell] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, January 07, 2012 ⚖ Case 4:2012cv00067/943441 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2012cv00067/943441 involves IWOWWE, INC. and MANE World Promotions, Inc. and Mark Genovese. Filed on January 07, 2012, this case deals with Copyrights based on 17 U.S.C. § 101. Judge Nancy F. Atlas is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Mark Genovese … | |
|
Texas, January 24, 2012 ⚖ Case 4:2012cv00223/947248 In case 4:2012cv00223/947248 within US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Insulation Contractors of Texas, LLC brings a case against Bruce Lynn Bridges. Filed on January 24, 2012, this legal matter relates to Trademark as per 15 U.S.C. § 1125. The presiding judge is Keith P Ellison, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Bruce Lynn Bridges … | |
|
Texas, January 18, 2012 ⚖ Case 4:2012cv00169/946061 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 4:2012cv00169/946061 involves Ian A. Hauff and Davis Development, Inc., Morrow Construction Company, Inc., TX-Morrow Construction, Inc., TX-Davis Development, Inc. and Carolina Multifamily Construction, Inc. Filed on January 18, 2012, this case pertains to Employment under 42 U.S.C. § 2000. Presiding over this matter is Judge David Hittner. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ian A. Hauff … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Irving McKinney
More Information Jr |
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID |
| [Case # 2012cv00063/214726], [Filed: January 30, 2012] [ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ] [Judge: John McBryde] ✅ Rick Thaler >>> More Information |
|
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ivery T Williams
More Information |
Federal District Court |
| [Case # 2012cv00004/134418], [Filed: January 05, 2012] [ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ] [Judge: Leonard Davis, Judith K. Guthrie] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, January 19, 2012 ⚖ Case 2:2012cv00018/946389 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 2:2012cv00018/946389, Irma Vasquez files a suit against CMH Homes, Inc., Vanderbilt Mortgage & Finance, Inc. and Clayton Homes, Inc. The filing date was January 19, 2012, and this case concerns Other Fraud under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Presiding over the case is Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Vasquez … | |
|
Texas, January 06, 2012 ⚖ Case 4:2012cv00014/214027 US District Court for the Northern District of Texas case 4:2012cv00014/214027 comprises Isaac Fountain and Carol Foreman, Michael Worley, James Broadwater, Shawn Matlock, Terry Means and Jennifer Coffindaffer. Filed on January 06, 2012, this case concerns Civil Rights based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Judge John McBryde is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Isaac Fountain, ✅ Carol Foreman, ✅ Michael Worley, ✅ James Broadwater, ✅ Shawn Matlock, ✅ Terry Means, ✅ Jennifer Coffindaffer … | |
|
Texas, January 10, 2012 ⚖ Case 4:2012cv00085/944134 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2012cv00085/944134 comprises Itochu Building Products Co., Inc. and MV MAERSK KENTUCKY, E.R. Elsfleth Schiffahrts, Maersk Line, Ltd. and MV E.R. ELSFLETH. Filed on January 10, 2012, this case concerns Marine based on 46 U.S.C. § 1300. Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Elsfleth Schiffahrts, ✅ Maersk Line … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all