How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, October 11, 2011 ⚖ Case 3:2011cv02671/211117 At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2011cv02671/211117 involves Irri*Tech of Texas LLC and Irritec USA Inc. Filed on October 11, 2011, this case deals with Property Rights: Trademark based on 15 U.S.C. § 1051. Judge Barbara MG Lynn is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that Both have requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, October 11, 2011 ⚖ Case 4:2011cv03620/925061 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2011cv03620/925061, Iris Santiago files a suit against Avista Health Solutions, LLC, Hung Van Huynh and Hannah Grace Huynh. The filing date was October 11, 2011, and this case concerns Fair Labor Standards Act under 29 U.S.C. § 201. Presiding over the case is Judge Vanessa D Gilmore. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Iris Santiago, ✅ Hung Van Huynh, ✅ Hannah Grace Huynh … | |
|
Texas, October 14, 2011 ⚖ Case 3:2011cv02726/211302 US District Court for the Northern District of Texas case 3:2011cv02726/211302 comprises Innovation First International Inc and Zuru Inc. Filed on October 14, 2011, this case concerns All Other Real Property based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Jane J Boyle is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, October 14, 2011 ⚖ Case 4:2011cv03686/925999 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2011cv03686/925999 comprises Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Gustavo Adolfo Oqueli. Filed on October 14, 2011, this case concerns Cable/Satellite TV based on 47 U.S.C. § 0521. Judge Lynn N. Hughes is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Gustavo Adolfo Oqueli … | |
|
Texas, October 14, 2011 ⚖ Case 3:2011cv02725/211208 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the case 3:2011cv02725/211208 involves International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers AFL-CIO, Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 776, Donald Barker, John Crowdis, Tommy Daves, Alfredo Granado and Robert Martinez and Lockheed Martin Corporation. Filed on October 14, 2011, this case pertains to Labor/Management Relations under 05 U.S.C. § 704. Presiding over this matter is Judge A. Joe Fish. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Donald Barker, ✅ John Crowdis, ✅ Tommy Daves, ✅ Alfredo Granado, ✅ Robert Martinez … | |
|
Texas, October 11, 2011 ⚖ Case 7:2011cv00305/924954 In case 7:2011cv00305/924954 within US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Iris Rivera brings a case against ODP Management, LLC, Blanca E. Gonzalez, Jose S. Rodriguez and Yolanda Guerra. Filed on October 11, 2011, this legal matter relates to Fair Labor Standards Act as per 15 U.S.C. § 5. The presiding judge is Randy Crane, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Iris Rivera, ✅ Blanca E. Gonzalez, ✅ Jose S. Rodriguez, ✅ Yolanda Guerra … | |
|
Texas, February 16, 2011 ⚖ Case 5:2011cv00039/128259 At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 5:2011cv00039/128259 entails ION, INC., and Sercel, Inc. The filing date is February 16, 2011, and this case deals with Patent as per 28 U.S.C. § 1338. Judge David Folsom is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. | |
|
Texas, February 16, 2011 ⚖ Case 6:2011cv00075/128232 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 6:2011cv00075/128232, Ichos, LLC files a suit against ADT Security Services, Inc. The filing date was February 16, 2011, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. Presiding over the case is Judge Leonard Davis. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, October 13, 2011 ⚖ Case 6:2011cv00533/132889 US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 6:2011cv00533/132889 comprises Ivory Franklin and Michael J. Astrue. Filed on October 13, 2011, this case concerns Disability Insurance based on 42 U.S.C. § 405. Judge Leonard Davis, Judith K. Guthrie is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ivory Franklin, ✅ Michael J. Astrue … | |
|
Texas, February 16, 2011 ⚖ Case 4:2011cv00580/865924 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2011cv00580/865924 involves International Interests, LP and Kildare, LLC and Mt. Hawley Insurance Company and CFP Gess SPE, LLC. Filed on February 16, 2011, this case deals with Insurance based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Lee H Rosenthal is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all