Case Search – Texas (TX)

How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas

You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:

1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.

2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.

3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.

4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.

Steps to Perform a Search:

1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.

Texas Lawyers Directory


Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!


Participant Index
B -> Barber...(click to open)   Barber, W.
  Berryhill, Nancy
D -> Devce...(click to open)   Devce, Huawei
F -> Filed...(click to open)   Filed, Incorrectly
G -> GmbH...(click to open)   GmbH, Crytek
  Gonzales, Ida
K -> Kelly...(click to open)   Kelly, John
L -> Langford...(click to open)   Langford, Robert
N -> Nwoha...(click to open)   Nwoha, Ike
R -> Rodriguez...(click to open)   Rodriguez, Ivone
S -> Sessions...(click to open)   Sessions, Jefferson
  Solomon, Ian
U -> UNIVERSITY...(click to open)   UNIVERSITY, Industry-univeristy
V -> Vetcher...(click to open)   Vetcher, Ivan

Texas,   May 05, 2017
Case 3:2017cv00139/875210
US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 3:2017cv00139/875210 comprises Ivone Rodriguez and Nancy A. Berryhill. Filed on May 05, 2017, this case concerns Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI based on 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits. Judge Robert F. Castaneda, Frank Montalvo is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Ivone Rodriguez, ✅ Nancy A. Berryhill 
Texas,   July 10, 2018
Case 2:2018cv00284/183362
In case 2:2018cv00284/183362, Infernal Technology, LLC and Terminal Reality, Inc. initiates legal action against Crytek GmbH at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The case was filed on July 10, 2018 and involves matters related to Patent under 28 U.S.C. § 1338. Rodney Gilstrap presides over the case, and Referring Judge Roy S Payne is also involved. Interestingly, Plaintiff has demanded a jury to hear this case.
More Information about >>> ✅ Crytek GmbH 
Texas,   July 13, 2018
Case 4:2018cv02419/1535973
In case 4:2018cv02419/1535973 within US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Iglesias Realty, LLC brings a case against Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's. Filed on July 13, 2018, this legal matter relates to Insurance as per 28 U.S.C. § 1330. The presiding judge is Lee H Rosenthal, and the Defendant has made a request for a jury trial.
Texas,   July 13, 2018
Case 3:2018cv01803/304700
At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2018cv01803/304700 entails Ike Nwoha and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA. The filing date is July 13, 2018, and this case deals with Real Property: All Other Real Property as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Sam R Cummings is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded.
More Information about >>> ✅ Ike Nwoha 
Texas,   July 02, 2018
Case 3:2018cv01724/304274
At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, case 3:2018cv01724/304274 involves Ivan Alexandrovich Vetcher bringing a case against John F Kelly and Jefferson B Sessions, III. Filed on July 02, 2018, this case addresses issues related to Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: Alien Detainee based on 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The case is presided over by Judge Ed Kinkeade, with Referring Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez also involved. There is no specific request for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Ivan Alexandrovich Vetcher, ✅ John F Kelly, ✅ Jefferson B Sessions 
Texas,   July 02, 2018
Case 3:2018cv01733/304289
The legal proceedings in case 3:2018cv01733/304289 at US District Court for the Northern District of Texas involve Ian Solomon and DePuy Products Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy International Limited and Johnson & Johnson Inc. Filed on July 02, 2018, this case focuses on Torts/Pers Inj: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Pers Inj/Product Liability based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Ed Kinkeade is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Ian Solomon 
Texas,   July 31, 2018
Case 2:2018cv00327/183834
At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 2:2018cv00327/183834 involves INDUSTRY-UNIVERISTY COOPERATION FOUNDATION HANYANG UNIVERSITY and Huawei Devce, USA, Inc., Huawei Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Huawei Device (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Filed on July 31, 2018, this case deals with Patent based on 15 U.S.C. § 1126. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ INDUSTRY-UNIVERISTY COOPERATION FOUNDATION HANYANG UNIVERSITY, ✅ Huawei Devce 
Texas,   July 26, 2018
Case 4:2018cv00531/183767
In case 4:2018cv00531/183767, Insight Investments, LLC initiates legal action against United Excel Corporation and Icon Construction, Inc. at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The case was filed on July 26, 2018 and involves matters related to Contract: Other under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Kimberly C Priest Johnson presides over the case, and Referring Judge Amos L Mazzant is also involved. Interestingly, Plaintiff has demanded a jury to hear this case.
Texas,   October 12, 2017
Case 4:2017cv03074/1459927
At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2017cv03074/1459927 entails Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. The filing date is October 12, 2017, and this case deals with Other Statutory Actions as per 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded.
More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed 
Texas,   October 12, 2017
Case 1:2017cv00973/898750
US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 1:2017cv00973/898750 comprises International Fidelity Insurance Company and BEP 1 & 2, LLC, BEP America, Inc., W. Craig Barber and Robert Langford. Filed on October 12, 2017, this case concerns Contract: Other based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract. Judge Lee Yeakel is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ W. Craig Barber, ✅ Robert Langford 
Texas,   October 12, 2017
Case 3:2017cv02804/294275
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas case 3:2017cv02804/294275 comprises Ida Gonzales and Nancy Berryhill. Filed on October 12, 2017, this case concerns Supplemental Security Income based on 42 U.S.C. § 416. Judge A. Joe Fish, Paul D Stickney is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Ida Gonzales, ✅ Nancy Berryhill 

2 thoughts on “Case Search – Texas (TX)”

  1. Good Morning
    I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
    I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
    Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
    In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
    The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
    RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
    Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
    Comment on the No comment

  2. RE- LARBI SEMIANI
    I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
    I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
    I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
    Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
    thanks to all

Comments are closed.