How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, June 01, 2018 ⚖ Case 1:2018cv00473/948323 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 1:2018cv00473/948323, Irma Rosas files a suit against Gregory Abbott and University Health System. The filing date was June 01, 2018, and this case concerns Civil Rights: Other under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act. Presiding over the case is Judge Mark Lane, Lee Yeakel. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Rosas, ✅ Gregory Abbott … | |
|
Texas, June 18, 2018 ⚖ Case 4:2018cv02014/1524846 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2018cv02014/1524846 entails Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. The filing date is June 18, 2018, and this case deals with Other Statutory Actions as per 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, June 18, 2018 ⚖ Case 4:2018cv02007/1524789 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2018cv02007/1524789 comprises Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on June 18, 2018, this case concerns Other Statutory Actions based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, June 18, 2018 ⚖ Case 3:2018cv00185/952647 At the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the legal case 3:2018cv00185/952647 entails Itza Judith Diaz De Leon and Nancy A. Berryhill. The filing date is June 18, 2018, and this case deals with Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI as per 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID). Judge Philip R. Martinez is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Itza Judith Diaz De Leon, ✅ Nancy A. Berryhill … | |
|
Texas, June 13, 2018 ⚖ Case 1:2018cv00284/182856 The legal proceedings in case 1:2018cv00284/182856 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Ira Johnson and Earnest Gallien and New Prime, Inc. and Patrick Johnson. Filed on June 13, 2018, this case focuses on Motor Vehicle based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Marcia A. Crone is presiding, and it's notable that Both have requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ira Johnson, ✅ Earnest Gallien, ✅ Patrick Johnson … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Incorrectly Filed
More Information |
Incorrectly Filed |
| [Case # 2018cv00080/1522312], [Filed: June 13, 2018] [ Other Statutory Actions§88 U.S.C. § 8888 ⚖ ] [Judge: Unassigned] ✅ Incorrectly Filed >>> More Information |
|
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ines Simon Blanco
More Information |
USA |
| [Case # 2018cv00401/182799], [Filed: June 07, 2018] [ Motions to Vacate Sentence§28 U.S.C. § 2255 ⚖ ] [Judge: Kimberly C Priest Johnson, Amos L. Mazzant] >>> More Information |
|
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Incorrectly Filed
More Information |
USA |
| [Case # 2018cv01754/1514495], [Filed: May 25, 2018] [ Other Statutory Actions§88 U.S.C. § 8888 ⚖ ] [Judge: Unassigned] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, June 14, 2018 ⚖ Case 3:2018cv01539/303615 At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2018cv01539/303615 involves Iron Oak Technologies LLC and Lenovo (United States) Inc and Lenovo Holding Company Inc. Filed on June 14, 2018, this case deals with Property Rights: Patent based on 15 U.S.C. § 1126. Judge Barbara MG Lynn is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, June 14, 2018 ⚖ Case 3:2018cv01543/303623 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas case 3:2018cv01543/303623, Iron Oak Technologies LLC files a suit against ACER Inc and Acer America Corporation. The filing date was June 14, 2018, and this case concerns Property Rights: Patent under 28 U.S.C. § 1338. Presiding over the case is Judge Barbara MG Lynn. Both have requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, June 14, 2018 ⚖ Case 7:2018cv00102/951761 In case 7:2018cv00102/951761 within US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Iryna M. Reeves brings a case against Dillard Texas Central, LLC, Dillard's Inc., Individually and and John Doe Nos. 1-3. Filed on June 14, 2018, this legal matter relates to Civil Rights: Jobs as per 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment). The presiding judge is David Counts, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Iryna M. Reeves … | |
|
Texas, June 19, 2018 ⚖ Case 3:2018cv01592/303770 The legal proceedings in case 3:2018cv01592/303770 at US District Court for the Northern District of Texas involve Ira Simmons and Hunter Warfield Inc. Filed on June 19, 2018, this case focuses on Consumer Credit based on 15 U.S.C. § 1692. Judge Ed Kinkeade is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ira Simmons … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ivan Francisco Alvarez-Benavente
More Information |
United States Of America |
| [Case # 2018cv00182/1525880], [Filed: June 19, 2018] [ Motions to Vacate Sentence§28 U.S.C. § 2255 ⚖ ] [Judge: Nelva Gonzales Ramos] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, June 14, 2018 ⚖ Case 3:2018cv01542/303617 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas case 3:2018cv01542/303617, Iron Oak Technologies LLC, Microsoft Corporation files a suit against Dell Inc. The filing date was June 14, 2018, and this case concerns Property Rights: Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 145. Presiding over the case is Judge Barbara MG Lynn. Both have requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, June 24, 2018 ⚖ Case 4:2018cv02123/1527277 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2018cv02123/1527277 comprises Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on June 24, 2018, this case concerns Other Statutory Actions based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all