How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, May 23, 2018 ⚖ Case 4:2018cv00378/182582 US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 4:2018cv00378/182582 comprises IFS Coatings, Inc. and Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. Filed on May 23, 2018, this case concerns Other Contract based on 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Judge Amos L. Mazzant is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Incorrectly Filed
More Information |
Incorrectly Filed |
| [Case # 2018cv00133/1505467], [Filed: May 10, 2018] [ Other Statutory Actions§88 U.S.C. § 8888 ⚖ ] [Judge: Unassigned] ✅ Incorrectly Filed >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, April 27, 2018 ⚖ Case 5:2018cv00379/939244 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 5:2018cv00379/939244, Intrasco, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank Northwest NA, Trustee files a suit against Textron Aviation Inc. The filing date was April 27, 2018, and this case concerns Personal Property: Other under 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage. Presiding over the case is Judge David A. Ezra. Both have requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, March 08, 2018 ⚖ Case 2:2018cv00055/181048 The legal proceedings in case 2:2018cv00055/181048 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Immersion Corporation and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Filed on March 08, 2018, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, March 08, 2018 ⚖ Case 2:2018cv00054/181039 The legal proceedings in case 2:2018cv00054/181039 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Implicit, LLC and Sandvine Corporation. Filed on March 08, 2018, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, March 08, 2018 ⚖ Case 2:2018cv00053/181038 In case 2:2018cv00053/181038 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Implicit, LLC brings a case against NETSCOUT Systems, Inc. Filed on March 08, 2018, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Rodney Gilstrap, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, May 31, 2018 ⚖ Case 3:2018cv01397/303002 The legal proceedings in case 3:2018cv01397/303002 at US District Court for the Northern District of Texas involve Infernal Technology LLC and Terminal Reality Inc and Activision Blizzard Inc. Filed on May 31, 2018, this case focuses on Patent based on 28 U.S.C. § 1338. Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, May 31, 2018 ⚖ Case 5:2018cv00537/947847 In case 5:2018cv00537/947847 within US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Irma Rosas brings a case against Bexar County, Texas, City of San Antonio, NRP Group, LLC, San Antonio Housing Authority, Texas Rio Grande Legal Aid, Inc. and Union Pacific Railroad. Filed on May 31, 2018, this legal matter relates to Civil Rights: Accommodations as per 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act. The presiding judge is Henry J. Bemporad, Xavier Rodriguez, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Rosas … | |
|
Texas, May 31, 2018 ⚖ Case 5:2018cv00536/947831 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 5:2018cv00536/947831, Irma Rosas files a suit against University of Texas at San Antonio. The filing date was May 31, 2018, and this case concerns Civil Rights: Other under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act. Presiding over the case is Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney, David A. Ezra. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Rosas … | |
|
Texas, June 01, 2018 ⚖ Case 4:2018cv00435/303143 At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2018cv00435/303143 involves Ian Powell and FTS International Services LLC. Filed on June 01, 2018, this case deals with Fair Labor Standards Act based on 15 U.S.C. § 5. Judge Terry R Means is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ian Powell … | |
|
Texas, June 01, 2018 ⚖ Case 4:2018cv00390/182690 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the case 4:2018cv00390/182690 involves Intrinsic Hospitality, LLC and Jay Karotkin, Sean Osborne and Jagmohan Dhillon. Filed on June 01, 2018, this case pertains to Other Statutory Actions under 18 U.S.C. § 1836. Presiding over this matter is Judge Amos L. Mazzant. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Jay Karotkin, ✅ Sean Osborne, ✅ Jagmohan Dhillon … | |
|
Texas, June 11, 2018 ⚖ Case 4:2018cv01905/1520934 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 4:2018cv01905/1520934 involves Imran Wasiq and Textron Ground Support Equipment, Inc. Filed on June 11, 2018, this case pertains to Tort Product Liability under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Presiding over this matter is Judge David Hittner. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Imran Wasiq … | |
|
Texas, June 01, 2018 ⚖ Case 1:2018cv00472/948312 In case 1:2018cv00472/948312 within US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Irma Rosas brings a case against Austin Independent School District, Texas Department of State Health Services and Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, Inc. Filed on June 01, 2018, this legal matter relates to Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment as per 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act. The presiding judge is Mark Lane, Robert Pitman, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irma Rosas … | |
|
Texas, June 01, 2018 ⚖ Case 1:2018cv00265/182691 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 1:2018cv00265/182691, Industrial Metals Company files a suit against Union Pacific Railroad. The filing date was June 01, 2018, and this case concerns Other Personal Property Damage under 28 U.S.C. § 1442. Presiding over the case is Judge Marcia A. Crone. The Defendant has requested a jury trial. | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all