How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, March 07, 2018 ⚖ Case 4:2018cv00722/1488457 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 4:2018cv00722/1488457 involves Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on March 07, 2018, this case pertains to Other Statutory Actions under 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Presiding over this matter is Judge Unassigned. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, March 19, 2018 ⚖ Case 4:2018cv00180/181252 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas case 4:2018cv00180/181252, Ilean Stapleton files a suit against Ruiz Food Products, Inc. The filing date was March 19, 2018, and this case concerns Employment under 42 U.S.C. § 2000. Presiding over the case is Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson, Amos L. Mazzant. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ilean Stapleton … | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
Iron Oak Technologies
More Information |
Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Information Systems Inc. |
| [Case # 16-cv-03320/1057140], [Filed: February 27, 2018] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, February 27, 2018 ⚖ Case 4:2018cv00609/1486394 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2018cv00609/1486394 involves Ignacio H Mendoza and Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC and John Doe. Filed on February 27, 2018, this case deals with Other Personal Injury based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Sim Lake is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Defendant has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ignacio H Mendoza … | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
Iron Oak Technologies
More Information |
Dell Inc. |
| [Case # 17-cv-00999/1057144], [Filed: February 27, 2018] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, March 26, 2018 ⚖ Case 4:2018cv00951/1492741 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed are involved in case 4:2018cv00951/1492741. Filed on March 26, 2018, this legal matter focuses on Other Statutory Actions under 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
Iron Oak Technologies
More Information |
Sharp Electronics Corporation and Sharp Corporation |
| [Case # 17-cv-02699/1057137], [Filed: February 27, 2018] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information |
|
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
Iron Oak Technologies
More Information |
HP Inc. |
| [Case # 17-cv-01068/1057145], [Filed: February 27, 2018] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information |
|
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
Iron Oak Technologies
More Information |
Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Device Co Ltd and Huawei Device (Dongguan) Co Ltd |
| [Case # 17-cv-00744/1057135], [Filed: February 27, 2018] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information |
|
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
Iron Oak Technologies
More Information |
Acer America Corporation and Acer Inc. |
| [Case # 17-cv-00143/1057143], [Filed: February 27, 2018] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information |
|
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| Iron Oak Technologies LLC | ZTE (USA) INC |
| [Case # 17-cv-03112/1057138], [Filed: February 27, 2018] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, March 06, 2018 ⚖ Case 4:2018cv00713/1488182 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2018cv00713/1488182 comprises Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on March 06, 2018, this case concerns Other Statutory Actions based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, March 13, 2018 ⚖ Case 4:2018cv00789/1489683 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2018cv00789/1489683 entails Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. The filing date is March 13, 2018, and this case deals with Other Statutory Actions as per 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all