Case Search – Texas (TX)

How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas

You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:

1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.

2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.

3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.

4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.

Steps to Perform a Search:

1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.

Texas Lawyers Directory


Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!


Participant Index
A -> Alvarado...(click to open)   Alvarado, Iliana
C -> Crow...(click to open)   Crow, Ivory
E -> Enforcement...(click to open)   Enforcement, Customs
F -> Filed...(click to open)   Filed, Incorrectly
J -> Jordan...(click to open)   Jordan, Iglesia
K -> Kiziltan...(click to open)   Kiziltan, Celal
L -> Lacy...(click to open)   Lacy, Robert
O -> Ortiz...(click to open)   Ortiz, Isaac
R -> Rodriguez-Hemlock...(click to open)   Rodriguez-Hemlock, Ivan
S -> Scott...(click to open)   Scott, Annie
  Scott, Ireal
  Snead, Ben
T -> Tamez...(click to open)   Tamez, Isidro
W -> Willis...(click to open)   Willis, Warden
Y -> Yeboah...(click to open)   Yeboah, Isaac

Texas,   October 13, 2017
Case 4:2017cv03097/1460206
The legal proceedings in case 4:2017cv03097/1460206 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve Isidro Tamez, Jr. and City of Houston, Texas. Filed on October 13, 2017, this case focuses on Employment based on 42 U.S.C. § 2000. Judge Lee H Rosenthal is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Isidro Tamez 
Texas,   October 13, 2017
Case 3:2017cv00308/1460053
In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Isaac Ortiz and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC are involved in case 3:2017cv00308/1460053. Filed on October 13, 2017, this legal matter focuses on Other Personal Injury under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge George C Hanks is presiding, and no jury trial is requested.
More Information about >>> ✅ Isaac Ortiz 
Texas,   October 18, 2017
Case 1:2017cv00999/899761
The legal proceedings in case 1:2017cv00999/899761 at US District Court for the Western District of Texas involve Iron Oak Technologies, LLC and Dell Inc. Filed on October 18, 2017, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement. Judge Robert Pitman is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Texas,   October 17, 2017
Case 4:2017cv03123/1460882
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2017cv03123/1460882 comprises Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on October 17, 2017, this case concerns Review or Appeal of Agency Decision based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed 
Texas,   October 18, 2017
Case 4:2017cv03147/1461235
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2017cv03147/1461235 comprises Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on October 18, 2017, this case concerns Family and Medical Leave Act based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed 
Texas,   October 25, 2017
Case 3:2017cv02938/294870
At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2017cv02938/294870 entails Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company and MBP Capital Inc and MBP Texas LLC. The filing date is October 25, 2017, and this case deals with Contract: Insurance as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation. Judge A. Joe Fish is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded.
Texas,   October 25, 2017
Case 4:2017cv03236/1462580
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2017cv03236/1462580 comprises Iliana Alvarado and The Prudential Insurance Company of America. Filed on October 25, 2017, this case concerns Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 based on 28 U.S.C. § 1132. Judge Vanessa D Gilmore is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Iliana Alvarado 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ivan Jesus Rodriguez-Hemlock
More Information
Robert Lacy
[Case # 2017cv03257/1462986], [Filed: October 25, 2017]
[ General§28 U.S.C. § 2241 ⚖ ]
[Judge: Keith P Ellison]
✅ Robert Lacy >>> More Information
Texas,   October 24, 2017
Case 4:2017cv03224/1462368
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2017cv03224/1462368 comprises Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on October 24, 2017, this case concerns Other Statutory Actions based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed 
Texas,   October 24, 2017
Case 5:2017cv01077/900643
At the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the legal case 5:2017cv01077/900643 involves Iglesia El Jordan and Church Mutual Insurance Company and Ben D. Snead. Filed on October 24, 2017, this case deals with Insurance based on 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract. Judge Fred Biery is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Iglesia El Jordan, ✅ Ben D. Snead 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ivory Orey Crow
More Information
Warden James Scott Willis
[Case # 2017cv00324/901425], [Filed: October 26, 2017]
[ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa ⚖ ]
[Judge: Philip R. Martinez]
✅ Warden James Scott Willis >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Isaac Yeboah
More Information
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
[Case # 2017cv02894/294691], [Filed: October 20, 2017]
[ General§28 U.S.C. § 2241 ⚖ ]
[Judge: Ed Kinkeade, Paul D Stickney]
✅ Customs Enforcement >>> More Information
Texas,   October 20, 2017
Case 1:2017cv00159/294670
At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 1:2017cv00159/294670 involves Ireal Scott and Annie Scott and Celal Kiziltan and Hazel Transportation, Inc. Filed on October 20, 2017, this case deals with Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal. Judge E Scott Frost is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that Both have requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Ireal Scott, ✅ Annie Scott, ✅ Celal Kiziltan 

2 thoughts on “Case Search – Texas (TX)”

  1. Good Morning
    I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
    I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
    Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
    In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
    The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
    RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
    Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
    Comment on the No comment

  2. RE- LARBI SEMIANI
    I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
    I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
    I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
    Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
    thanks to all

Comments are closed.