Case Search – Texas (TX)

How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas

You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:

1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.

2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.

3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.

4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.

Steps to Perform a Search:

1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.

Texas Lawyers Directory


Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!


Participant Index
A -> Alcantar...(click to open)   Alcantar, Martin
D -> Deisch...(click to open)   Deisch, David
F -> Filed...(click to open)   Filed, Incorrectly
H -> Habboub...(click to open)   Habboub, Ibrahim
  Hudson, Inez
I -> Institute...(click to open)   Institute, Southwest
J -> Jones...(click to open)   Jones, Kendall
M -> Mares...(click to open)   Mares, Imelda
  Marsh, Ingrid
  Marsh, John
  Martin, Deborah
  Miller, Isabel
R -> Rios...(click to open)   Rios, Ignacio
S -> Sanabria-Medina...(click to open)   Sanabria-Medina, Israel
V -> Viviente...(click to open)   Viviente, Iglesia
D -> de...(click to open)   de, Fletes

Texas,   August 18, 2017
Case 3:2017cv00261/889732
In case 3:2017cv00261/889732 within US District Court for the Western District of Texas, Israel Sanabria-Medina brings a case against Martin Gilberto Alcantar and Fletes Sotelo S.A. de C.V. Filed on August 18, 2017, this legal matter relates to Motor Vehicle as per 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence. The presiding judge is Kathleen Cardone, and the Defendant has made a request for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Israel Sanabria-Medina, ✅ Martin Gilberto Alcantar, ✅ Fletes Sotelo de 
Texas,   August 16, 2017
Case 7:2017cv00313/1449447
In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Imelda Mares and State Farm Lloyds are involved in case 7:2017cv00313/1449447. Filed on August 16, 2017, this legal matter focuses on Insurance under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Ricardo H Hinojosa is presiding, and no jury trial is requested.
More Information about >>> ✅ Imelda Mares 
Texas,   April 02, 2017
Case 4:2017cv01014/1421802
In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2017cv01014/1421802, Incorrectly Filed files a suit against Incorrectly Filed. The filing date was April 02, 2017, and this case concerns Other Statutory Actions under 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Presiding over the case is Judge Unassigned. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed 
Texas,   September 01, 2017
Case 4:2017cv02657/1452301
In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 4:2017cv02657/1452301 involves INC Nautical, L.P. and Paychex, Inc. Filed on September 01, 2017, this case pertains to Other Contract under 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Presiding over this matter is Judge Nancy F Atlas. There is no demand for a jury trial.
Texas,   August 31, 2017
Case 5:2017cv00841/891518
At the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the legal case 5:2017cv00841/891518 involves Ignacio Rios and Southwest Research Institute. Filed on August 31, 2017, this case deals with Family and Medical Leave Act based on 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act. Judge Xavier Rodriguez is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Ignacio Rios, ✅ Southwest Research Institute 
Texas,   August 31, 2017
Case 2:2017cv00625/178089
The legal proceedings in case 2:2017cv00625/178089 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Interactive Play Devices, LLC and Target Corporation. Filed on August 31, 2017, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Texas,   September 01, 2017
Case 4:2017cv02654/1452278
The legal proceedings in case 4:2017cv02654/1452278 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve Inez Hudson and David Deisch, Gateway Distribution, Inc. and Gateway Distribution of Texas, Inc. Filed on September 01, 2017, this case focuses on Motor Vehicle based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Lynn N Hughes is presiding, and it's notable that the Defendant has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Inez Hudson, ✅ David Deisch 
Texas,   September 01, 2017
Case 3:2017cv02338/292578
At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2017cv02338/292578 entails Iglesia Del Dios Viviente and The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Kendall Jones. The filing date is September 01, 2017, and this case deals with Insurance as per 12 U.S.C. § 635. Judge Sam R Cummings is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded.
More Information about >>> ✅ Iglesia Del Dios Viviente, ✅ Kendall Jones 
Texas,   September 01, 2017
Case 5:2017cv00847/891700
At the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the legal case 5:2017cv00847/891700 involves Ingrid Marsh and John Marsh and Deborah Martin and U.S. Bank, N.A., as Successor Trustee to LaSalle Bank National Association on Behalf of the Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-HE12, Asset Backed Certificates Series 2005-HE1. Filed on September 01, 2017, this case deals with Real Property: Foreclosure based on 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure. Judge Fred Biery is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Ingrid Marsh, ✅ John Marsh, ✅ Deborah Martin 
Texas,   August 29, 2017
Case 4:2017cv00602/178063
At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2017cv00602/178063 involves Ibrahim Habboub and Smith Systems Manufacturing Company. Filed on August 29, 2017, this case deals with Employment based on 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Judge Amos L. Mazzant is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Ibrahim Habboub 
Texas,   January 04, 2016
Case 4:2016cv00001/165276
At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2016cv00001/165276 involves Isabel Miller and 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. Filed on January 04, 2016, this case deals with Other Personal Injury based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Ron Clark is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Isabel Miller 
Texas,   January 04, 2016
Case 2:2016cv00001/165272
The legal proceedings in case 2:2016cv00001/165272 at US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas involve Innovative Automation LLC and Midwest Tape LLC and Hoopla LLC. Filed on January 04, 2016, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Rodney Gilstrap, Roy S. Payne is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.

2 thoughts on “Case Search – Texas (TX)”

  1. Good Morning
    I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
    I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
    Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
    In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
    The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
    RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
    Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
    Comment on the No comment

  2. RE- LARBI SEMIANI
    I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
    I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
    I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
    Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
    thanks to all

Comments are closed.