How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, June 07, 2017 ⚖ Case 6:2017cv00336/176549 At the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the legal case 6:2017cv00336/176549 involves Implicit, LLC and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Filed on June 07, 2017, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Rodney Gilstrap is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, June 01, 2017 ⚖ Case 6:2017cv00143/878878 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 6:2017cv00143/878878, Iron Oak Technologies, LLC files a suit against Acer America Corporation and Acer Inc. The filing date was June 01, 2017, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Jeffrey C. Manske, Robert Pitman. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, June 01, 2017 ⚖ Case 4:2017cv01645/1433854 The legal proceedings in case 4:2017cv01645/1433854 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve Issa Khreas and 5454 Airport, L.L.C., BFLP Operations, LLC, Little York Plaza Texaco, LLC and Patricia Boulos Ganim. Filed on June 01, 2017, this case focuses on Fair Labor Standards Act based on 29 U.S.C. § 201. Judge Sim Lake is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Issa Khreas, ✅ Patricia Boulos Ganim … | |
|
Texas, January 08, 2016 ⚖ Case 3:2016cv00006/1325409 The legal proceedings in case 3:2016cv00006/1325409 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on January 08, 2016, this case focuses on Other Statutory Actions based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, January 08, 2016 ⚖ Case 3:2016cv00005/1325394 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2016cv00005/1325394 involves Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on January 08, 2016, this case deals with Other Statutory Actions based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, January 08, 2016 ⚖ Case 7:2016cv00009/1325361 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 7:2016cv00009/1325361, Israel Garcia, Jr. files a suit against Scottsdale Insurance Company. The filing date was January 08, 2016, and this case concerns Insurance under 12 U.S.C. § 635. Presiding over the case is Judge Ricardo H. Hinojosa. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Israel Garcia … | |
|
Texas, May 14, 2017 ⚖ Case 4:2017cv01486/1430244 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2017cv01486/1430244 entails Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. The filing date is May 14, 2017, and this case deals with Other Statutory Actions as per 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ivan Alexandrovich Vetcher
More Information |
Loretta Lynch |
| [Case # 2016cv00003/268722], [Filed: January 08, 2016] [ Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee§42 U.S.C. § 1983 ⚖ ] [Judge: E. Scott Frost, Jorge A Solis] ✅ Loretta Lynch >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, June 09, 2017 ⚖ Case 3:2017cv01544/289247 In case 3:2017cv01544/289247 within US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Inez Perez and Matilde Perez brings a case against State Farm LLoyds and Teresa Williams. Filed on June 09, 2017, this legal matter relates to Insurance as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The presiding judge is Sam R Cummings, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Inez Perez, ✅ Matilde Perez, ✅ Teresa Williams … | |
|
Texas, June 12, 2017 ⚖ Case 2:2017mc00561/1435878 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 2:2017mc00561/1435878 entails Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. The filing date is June 12, 2017, and this case deals with Other Statutory Actions as per 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, June 12, 2017 ⚖ Case 5:2017cv00522/880122 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 5:2017cv00522/880122, In and Out Express files a suit against Great Lakes Insurance SE and Phillip Watkins. The filing date was June 12, 2017, and this case concerns Insurance under 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract. Presiding over the case is Judge Fred Biery. Both have requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Phillip Watkins … | |
|
Texas, June 01, 2017 ⚖ Case 1:2017cv00525/878894 The legal proceedings in case 1:2017cv00525/878894 at US District Court for the Western District of Texas involve Iron Oak Technologies, LLC and Lenovo (United States) Inc. and Lenovo Holding Company, Inc. Filed on June 01, 2017, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement. Judge Robert Pitman is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ivory Lee Thompson
More Information |
USA |
| [Case # 2017cv00484/289425], [Filed: June 15, 2017] [ Motions to Vacate Sentence§28 U.S.C. § 2255 ⚖ ] [Judge: John McBryde] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, June 15, 2017 ⚖ Case 4:2017mc01563/1436629 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 4:2017mc01563/1436629 involves Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on June 15, 2017, this case pertains to Other under No cause code entered. Presiding over this matter is Judge Unassigned. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all