How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, February 28, 2017 ⚖ Case 1:2017cv00080/174520 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Indian Harbor Insurance Company and Gray Insurance Company, The are involved in case 1:2017cv00080/174520. Filed on February 28, 2017, this legal matter focuses on Insurance under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Marcia A. Crone is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. | |
|
Texas, March 02, 2017 ⚖ Case 3:2017cv00064/1415841 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 3:2017cv00064/1415841, Incorrectly Filed files a suit against Incorrectly Filed. The filing date was March 02, 2017, and this case concerns Other Statutory Actions under 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Presiding over the case is Judge Unassigned. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, May 26, 2016 ⚖ Case 1:2016cv00626/818680 At the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the legal case 1:2016cv00626/818680 involves Iris Delgado and LaTonya Jones and EZCorp, Inc. Filed on May 26, 2016, this case deals with Other Statutory Actions based on 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Judge Robert Pitman is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Iris Delgado, ✅ LaTonya Jones … | |
|
Texas, May 26, 2016 ⚖ Case 4:2016cv01491/1362558 At the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the legal case 4:2016cv01491/1362558 entails Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. The filing date is May 26, 2016, and this case deals with Other Statutory Actions as per 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, May 26, 2016 ⚖ Case 2:2016cv00183/1362452 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed are involved in case 2:2016cv00183/1362452. Filed on May 26, 2016, this legal matter focuses on Other Statutory Actions under 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Irvin Edamir Gonzalez-Torres
More Information |
Steven Hayes and Richard Wiles |
| [Case # 2017cv00051/865209], [Filed: February 22, 2017] [ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa ⚖ ] [Judge: David Briones] ✅ Steven Hayes, ✅ Richard Wiles >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, February 22, 2017 ⚖ Case 5:2017cv00139/865230 The legal proceedings in case 5:2017cv00139/865230 at US District Court for the Western District of Texas involve Ignacio G. Delao, Jr. and VT San Antonio Aerospace, Inc. Filed on February 22, 2017, this case focuses on Family and Medical Leave Act based on 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. Judge Orlando L. Garcia is presiding, and it's notable that Both have requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ignacio G. Delao … | |
|
Texas, March 14, 2017 ⚖ Case 4:2017cv00810/1418003 In case 4:2017cv00810/1418003 within US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Israel Curtis brings a case against Donald Sowell, Tommy Gage, Joseph Sclider, David Cook, Alton Neely, Tuck McLain, Grimes County and Montgomery County. Filed on March 14, 2017, this legal matter relates to Other Civil Rights as per 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The presiding judge is Kenneth M Hoyt, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Israel Curtis, ✅ Donald Sowell, ✅ Tommy Gage, ✅ Joseph Sclider, ✅ David Cook, ✅ Alton Neely, ✅ Tuck McLain … | |
|
Texas, February 12, 2017 ⚖ Case 5:2017cv00102/863490 In the US District Court for the Western District of Texas case 5:2017cv00102/863490, Imelda Avila and Rachel Gomez Garcez files a suit against Nextstep Development, Inc. The filing date was February 12, 2017, and this case concerns Labor: Fair Standards under 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation. Presiding over the case is Judge David A. Ezra. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Imelda Avila, ✅ Rachel Gomez Garcez … | |
|
Texas, March 15, 2017 ⚖ Case 5:2017cv00053/1418502 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 5:2017cv00053/1418502 comprises Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on March 15, 2017, this case concerns Other Statutory Actions based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, March 08, 2017 ⚖ Case 4:2017cv00754/1416941 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 4:2017cv00754/1416941 involves Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on March 08, 2017, this case pertains to Other Statutory Actions under 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Presiding over this matter is Judge Unassigned. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, March 14, 2017 ⚖ Case 4:2017cv00809/1417996 The legal proceedings in case 4:2017cv00809/1417996 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve ISDAGNY GEFERS and Life Time Fitness Inc and LTF Real Estate Company, Inc. Filed on March 14, 2017, this case focuses on Other Personal Injury based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge David Hittner is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ ISDAGNY GEFERS … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Ivan Colbert Frazier
More Information |
Texas Board of Pardon and Paroles |
| [Case # 2017cv00408/284576], [Filed: February 14, 2017] [ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ] [Judge: David L. Horan, Sam A Lindsay] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, February 14, 2017 ⚖ Case 3:2017cv00429/284628 At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2017cv00429/284628 involves Iron Oak Technologies LLC and Lenovo (United States) Inc and Lenovo Holding Company Inc. Filed on February 14, 2017, this case deals with Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, February 14, 2017 ⚖ Case 3:2017cv00430/284637 The legal proceedings in case 3:2017cv00430/284637 at US District Court for the Northern District of Texas involve Iron Oak Technologies LLC and Pantech Wireless Inc and Pantech Co Ltd. Filed on February 14, 2017, this case focuses on Patent based on 28 U.S.C. § 1338. Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, January 24, 2008 ⚖ Case 3:2008cv00027/278744 The legal proceedings in case 3:2008cv00027/278744 at US District Court for the Western District of Texas involve Ismael Fonseca and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P., AstraZeneca LP, Astra USA, Inc., KBI Sub, Inc., AstraZeneca AB, AstraZeneca PLC and AstraZeneca UK Limited. Filed on January 24, 2008, this case focuses on Personal Injury Product Liability based on 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability. Judge Frank Montalvo is presiding, and it's notable that Both have requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ismael Fonseca … | |
|
Texas, January 24, 2008 ⚖ Case 4:2008cv00277/550885 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 4:2008cv00277/550885 involves Ifeanyi Oramulu and Washington Mutual Bank, FA. Filed on January 24, 2008, this case pertains to Civil Rights: Jobs under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination. Presiding over this matter is Judge Keith P Ellison. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ifeanyi Oramulu … | |
|
Texas, March 07, 2017 ⚖ Case 3:2017cv00067/867112 The legal proceedings in case 3:2017cv00067/867112 at US District Court for the Western District of Texas involve Irvin Johnson, Sr. and Home Depot Product Authority, LLC, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., John Doe Company and Joubert USA. Filed on March 07, 2017, this case focuses on Personal Injury Product Liability based on 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability. Judge Frank Montalvo is presiding, and it's notable that Both have requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Irvin Johnson. … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Incorrectly Filed
More Information |
Incorrectly Filed |
| [Case # 2017cv00043/1416588], [Filed: March 07, 2017] [ Other Statutory Actions§88 U.S.C. § 8888 ⚖ ] [Judge: Unassigned] ✅ Incorrectly Filed >>> More Information |
|
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all