How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Texas, October 13, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv02999/1303646 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed are involved in case 4:2015cv02999/1303646. Filed on October 13, 2015, this legal matter focuses on Review or Appeal of Agency Decision under 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, October 13, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv02998/1303642 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2015cv02998/1303642 comprises Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on October 13, 2015, this case concerns Other Statutory Actions based on 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Judge Unassigned is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, October 15, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv03040/1304306 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, ING Bank N.V. and M/V SITEAM EXPLORER, IMO No. 9326902 her engines, tackle, equipment, furniture, appurtenances, etc., in rem are involved in case 4:2015cv03040/1304306. Filed on October 15, 2015, this legal matter focuses on Marine under 28 U.S.C. § 1333. Judge Nancy F. Atlas is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ M/V SITEAM EXPLORER, ✅ in rem … | |
|
Texas, October 19, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv00784/265680 In case 4:2015cv00784/265680 within US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Imran Qurashi brings a case against Pamela Bates. Filed on October 19, 2015, this legal matter relates to Other Civil Rights as per 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The presiding judge is John McBryde, and the Defendant has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Imran Qurashi, ✅ Pamela Bates … | |
|
Texas, October 05, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv02905/1301674 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas case 4:2015cv02905/1301674 comprises IberiaBank and Victory Surgical Hospital East Houston, L.P. Filed on October 05, 2015, this case concerns Other Contract based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Melinda Harmon is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Victory Surgical Hospital East Houston … | |
|
Texas, October 05, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv02914/1301695 In case 4:2015cv02914/1301695 within US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Incorrectly Filed brings a case against Incorrectly Filed. Filed on October 05, 2015, this legal matter relates to Other Statutory Actions as per 88 U.S.C. § 8888. The presiding judge is Unassigned, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, October 05, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv02916/1301702 In case 4:2015cv02916/1301702 within US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Incorrectly Filed brings a case against Incorrectly Filed. Filed on October 05, 2015, this legal matter relates to Other Statutory Actions as per 88 U.S.C. § 8888. The presiding judge is Unassigned, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, October 20, 2015 ⚖ Case 2:2015cv00446/1305263 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, ING Bank N.V. and M/V JUMBO VISION, IMO No. 9153642, her engines, tackle, equipment, furniture, appurtenances, etc., in rem, Jumbo Shipping Co. SA and Jumbo Shipping Vof are involved in case 2:2015cv00446/1305263. Filed on October 20, 2015, this legal matter focuses on Marine under 28 U.S.C. § 1333. Judge Jason B. Libby, Nelva Gonzales Ramos is presiding, and no jury trial is requested. More Information about >>> ✅ M/V JUMBO VISION, ✅ her engines, ✅ in rem, ✅ Jumbo Shipping Vof … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Israel Lara
More Information |
William Stephens |
| [Case # 2015cv02909/1301688], [Filed: October 05, 2015] [ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ] [Judge: Lynn N. Hughes, Stephen Smith] ✅ William Stephens >>> More Information |
|
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Incorrectly Filed
More Information |
Incorrectly Filed |
| [Case # 2015cv00424/1301938], [Filed: October 05, 2015] [ Other Statutory Actions§88 U.S.C. § 8888 ⚖ ] [Judge: Unassigned] ✅ Incorrectly Filed >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, October 09, 2015 ⚖ Case 1:2015cv00899/776771 At the US District Court for the Western District of Texas, the legal case 1:2015cv00899/776771 involves IBT, Inc. and Peoples Bank of Moniteau County. Filed on October 09, 2015, this case deals with Contract: Recovery/Enforcement based on 12 U.S.C. § 1441 (a) Breach of Contract. Judge Sam Sparks is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, October 23, 2015 ⚖ Case 3:2015cv03453/265891 At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2015cv03453/265891 involves Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation and Orr Safety Corporation. Filed on October 23, 2015, this case deals with Other Contract based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge Sidney A Fitzwater is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, October 14, 2015 ⚖ Case 3:2015cv03312/265454 In the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas case 3:2015cv03312/265454, Icon Laser Solutions LLC files a suit against Diesel USA Inc. The filing date was October 14, 2015, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. Presiding over the case is Judge Ed Kinkeade. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, October 14, 2015 ⚖ Case 3:2015cv03310/265446 In case 3:2015cv03310/265446 within US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Icon Laser Solutions LLC brings a case against Aeropostale Inc. Filed on October 14, 2015, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 35 U.S.C. § 271. The presiding judge is Ed Kinkeade, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all