How to Look Up Someone’s Criminal Record in Texas
You have several options for obtaining someone’s criminal record in Texas:
1. Visit the Sheriff’s Office:
Go to the local Sheriff’s Office in the county where the individual resides or where the offense occurred. They can provide access to criminal records and background checks.
2. Local Court Visit:
Visit the local courthouse where the case was filed. The court clerk can assist you in accessing criminal records. Be sure to know the case number or the full name of the individual.
3. Online Resources:
Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS): The DPS offers an online Crime Record Search (CRS) service where you can request and view criminal history records for a fee.
DPS Crime Record Search.
4. Third-Party Websites:
There are several third-party websites that compile criminal history databases. These sites may require a fee and can provide detailed records.
One example is the Texas Lawyers Directory, where you can initiate a search by filling out the search box provided.
Steps to Perform a Search:
1. Gather the individual’s full name, date of birth, and any other identifying information.
2. Visit the appropriate Sheriff’s Office, local court, or online resource.
3. Follow the instructions to request or search for the criminal records.
4. Pay any applicable fees to access the records.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
| Interstate Distributor Co. | Andrew Jerome Ellis |
| [Case # 2015cv01781/1274491], [Filed: June 23, 2015] [ Arbitration§09 U.S.C. § 0010 ⚖ ] [Judge: Lee H Rosenthal] ✅ Andrew Jerome Ellis >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, June 29, 2015 ⚖ Case 3:2015cv02183/261869 The legal proceedings in case 3:2015cv02183/261869 at US District Court for the Northern District of Texas involve Insurance Safety Consultants LLC and Christopher Roberts and Carrie D Nugent. Filed on June 29, 2015, this case focuses on Other Statutory Actions based on 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Judge Jane J Boyle is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Christopher Roberts, ✅ Carrie D Nugent … | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
|
Israel Villalpando
More Information Jr |
USA |
| [Case # 2015cv00132/1277158], [Filed: June 29, 2015] [ Motions to Vacate Sentence§28 U.S.C. § 2255 ⚖ ] [Judge: Marina Garcia Marmolejo] >>> More Information |
|
|
Texas, June 30, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv01872/1276435 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 4:2015cv01872/1276435 involves Ime U. Eshiet and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Codilis & Stawiarski, P.C. and American Homes 4 Rent Properties Eight, LLC. Filed on June 30, 2015, this case pertains to All Other Real Property under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Presiding over this matter is Judge David Hittner. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ime U. Eshiet … | |
|
Texas, June 29, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv01851/1276050 The legal proceedings in case 4:2015cv01851/1276050 at US District Court for the Southern District of Texas involve Incident Free Operations, Inc. and Brian Dunagan and Delta Q Fire & Explosion Consultants, Inc., DForce Web Services LLC, Shannon Schemel and Joshua Stevenson. Filed on June 29, 2015, this case focuses on Copyrights based on 28 U.S.C. § 1338. Judge Keith P Ellison is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Brian Dunagan, ✅ Shannon Schemel, ✅ Joshua Stevenson … | |
|
Texas, June 29, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv01843/1276005 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 4:2015cv01843/1276005 involves Incorrectly Filed and Incorrectly Filed. Filed on June 29, 2015, this case pertains to Other Statutory Actions under 88 U.S.C. § 8888. Presiding over this matter is Judge Unassigned. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, June 23, 2015 ⚖ Case 3:2015cv02121/261566 At the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the legal case 3:2015cv02121/261566 entails ITW Building Components Group Inc and Garth Mann. The filing date is June 23, 2015, and this case deals with Other Contract as per 18 U.S.C. § 1030. Judge David C Godbey is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded. More Information about >>> ✅ Garth Mann … | |
|
Texas, July 02, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv01900/1277147 In case 4:2015cv01900/1277147 within US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Incorrectly Filed brings a case against Incorrectly Filed. Filed on July 02, 2015, this legal matter relates to Other Statutory Actions as per 88 U.S.C. § 8888. The presiding judge is Unassigned, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Incorrectly Filed, ✅ Incorrectly Filed … | |
|
Texas, July 10, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv01976/1279001 In the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the case 4:2015cv01976/1279001 involves ING Bank N.V. and National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia. Filed on July 10, 2015, this case pertains to Marine under 28 U.S.C. § 1333. Presiding over this matter is Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt. There is no demand for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 08, 2015 ⚖ Case 6:2015cv00660/161339 In case 6:2015cv00660/161339 within US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC brings a case against HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc., HCC Life Insurance Company, HCC Specialty Insurance Company, HCC Specialty Underwriters, Inc., Houston Casualty Company and Professional Indemnity Agency, Inc. Filed on July 08, 2015, this legal matter relates to Patent as per 15 U.S.C. § 1126. The presiding judge is Rodney Gilstrap, K. Nicole Mitchell, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 08, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv00689/264379 The legal proceedings in case 4:2015cv00689/264379 at US District Court for the Northern District of Texas involve Industrial Models Inc and SNF Inc, BrandFX LLC and BrandFX Holdings LLC. Filed on July 08, 2015, this case focuses on Other Statutes: Antitrust based on 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation. Judge John McBryde is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 08, 2015 ⚖ Case 3:2015cv02261/262129 The legal proceedings in case 3:2015cv02261/262129 at US District Court for the Northern District of Texas involve Industrial Models Inc and SNF Inc, BrandFX LLC and BrandFX Holdings LLC. Filed on July 08, 2015, this case focuses on Antitrust based on 15 U.S.C. § 1. Judge Ed Kinkeade is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Texas, July 14, 2015 ⚖ Case 4:2015cv00513/262367 In case 4:2015cv00513/262367 within US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Ignition L.P. f/k/a RadioShack Merchandising, L.P. and RS Legacy Global Sourcing Limited Partnership f/k/a RadioShack Global Sourcing Limited Partnership brings a case against AHCOF International Development Co, Inc. and TMAX Digital, Inc. Filed on July 14, 2015, this legal matter relates to Other Contract as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The presiding judge is Reed C O'Connor, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ RadioShack Merchandising … | |
Good Morning
I am the petitioner/plaintiff in this case’s Name : LARBI SEMIANI .
I have comment on the System of justice in USA , even as a defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court , and even as being a victim of human trafficking and serious criminal activities , physical and moral tortures , Unfortunately I am deliberately precluded from the equal access to an equal justice .
Incredible true , The ca court requires my appearance in person for an oral hearing , but the US Consular officer refuses to respect the Ca court orders and Ca laws , he rejects the orders and decisions of the Ca Hon Judges , .
In conclusion , I am informed that there is no a visa to enter USA for court trial , oral hearing . But the worst is that The US Consul and DOS Washington dc affirm that the decision of the US Consular in my country is above the Ca courts and Ca hon judges .
The US Consul is the highest Judge who has an immunity that allows him to be above the First amendment to US Constitution , and above all the US Lower laws .
RESULT : Imagin that my case is pended and my case is forwarded to the Ca LEAs for investigations but the problem without my appearance neither the CA court nor the CA LEA can do anything , then my case of judgment not be resolved .
Here is the resum of my comment , I think that there is something wrong somewhere if there is no an error to correct and to respect the nature of justice and nature of litigation . The Obstruction of justice is prohibited by Law but it is authorized only when the victim is / LARBI SEMIANI FROM Algeria.
Comment on the No comment
RE- LARBI SEMIANI
I already sent comment here but i noticed that there is no any other comment to support me . But I continue sending comments as i also need to be heard by the US Citizens , US Gov , and California state courts and Gov agencies .
I am very wondered as what has been done with my case may not be occured because my human and civil rights to be respected of human person then to access for an equal justice as being defendant in case of judgment before the Ca court but Ca court has only heard from petitioner , Hon court has imposed me a case of judgment but it has banned me from hearing and defense then the petitioner was defended and protected , even hon ca court was well informed on all what has been occured to me as a victim but without intervening at least to defend its own credibility as court of justice , incredible true . I had wished to defend the ca court law an d the ca constitution see bills of rights and better to report my case because all the shame is regarding the fradulent nature of litigation and obstruction of justice and violation of the US Constitution , and violation of the universal declarations of human rights .
I don t see what to say more because it is the only case worldwide which occurs .
Respectfully to all who will read my comment.
thanks to all