Searching a person’s name, business name or case type
searching for judgments against a person or business
displaying case information or activities.
Our site does not warrant or warrant the accuracy, completeness, relevance or usefulness for any general or specific purpose of the data available through access to this site.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
|
Delaware, July 12, 2024 ⚖ Case 1:2024cv00812 Original Watermen, Inc. initiates legal proceedings (case 1:2024cv00812) against Drink LMNT, Inc. at the US District Court for the District of Delaware. The case, filed on July 12, 2024, pertains to Trademark under 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act). Notably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this matter. | |
|
Delaware, August 30, 2024 ⚖ Case 1:2024cv01004 In the US District Court for the District of Delaware, the case 1:2024cv01004 involves Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and H. Lundbeck A/S and Apotex Pharmachem Inc., Apotex Inc., Apotex Corp. and Aposherm Delaware Holdings Corporation. Filed on August 30, 2024, this case pertains to Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over this matter is Judge Jennifer L Hall. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ H. Lundbeck A/S … | |
|
Delaware, September 10, 2024 ⚖ Case 1:2024cv01020 At the US District Court for the District of Delaware, case 1:2024cv01020 involves Ouraring, Inc. suing RingConn LLC. Filed on September 10, 2024, this case addresses a matter related to Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement. Plaintiff has explicitly requested a jury for this litigation. | |
|
Delaware, October 11, 2024 ⚖ Case 1:2024cv01133 Within the US District Court for the District of Delaware, Optimorphix, Inc. brings forward a case against Brightcove Holdings, Inc. and Brightcove Inc. in Case Number case 1:2024cv01133. Initiated on October 11, 2024, this legal matter pertains to an Patent issue based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. It's important to mention that Plaintiff has requested a jury for this case. | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
Onyinye Jason
More Information |
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company |
| [Case # 2024cv01269], [Filed: November 19, 2024] [ Labor: E.R.I.S.A.§29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement ⚖ ] >>> More Information |
|
|
Delaware, November 20, 2024 ⚖ Case 1:2024cv01272 Orlando R. Batson initiates legal proceedings (case 1:2024cv01272) against Brian Davidson, Terra Taylor, John and Jane Doe(s) 1-50 and Delaware Department of Corrections at the US District Court for the District of Delaware. The case, filed on November 20, 2024, pertains to Prisoner: Civil Rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act. Notably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this matter. More Information about >>> ✅ Orlando R. Batson, ✅ Brian Davidson, ✅ Terra Taylor … | |
|
Delaware, November 21, 2024 ⚖ Case 1:2024cv01278 In Case Number case 1:2024cv01278, OptiMorphix, Inc. takes legal action against Slack Technologies, LLC, Salesforce, Inc. and MuleSoft, LLC in the US District Court for the District of Delaware. Filed on November 21, 2024, this case involves an Patent matter under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Notably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case. | |
|
Delaware, November 21, 2024 ⚖ Case 1:2024cv01282 In Case Number case 1:2024cv01282, OptiMorphix, Inc. takes legal action against NVIDIA Corporation in the US District Court for the District of Delaware. Filed on November 21, 2024, this case involves an Patent matter under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Notably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case. | |
|
Delaware, November 25, 2024 ⚖ Case 1:2024cv01291 OptiMorphix, Inc. initiates legal proceedings (case 1:2024cv01291) against Intel Corporation at the US District Court for the District of Delaware. The case, filed on November 25, 2024, pertains to Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Notably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this matter. | |
|
Delaware, November 27, 2024 ⚖ Case 1:2024cv01301 The legal proceedings in case 1:2024cv01301 at US District Court for the District of Delaware involve OpenTV, Inc. and Pinterest, Inc. Filed on November 27, 2024, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Colm F Connolly is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| Orbicular Pharmaceutical Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Cipla USA | Shire-NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. |
| [Case # 2024cv01366], [Filed: December 13, 2024] [ Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA)§35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement ⚖ ] >>> More Information |
|
|
Delaware, December 06, 2024 ⚖ Case 1:2024cv01336 In the US District Court for the District of Delaware case 1:2024cv01336, OptiMorphix, Inc. files a suit against Akamai Technologies, Inc. The filing date was December 06, 2024, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Maryellen Noreika. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. | |
|
Delaware, December 27, 2024 ⚖ Case 1:2024cv01418 Within the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, OptiMorphix, Inc. brings forward a case against Fortinet, Inc. in Case Number case 1:2024cv01418. Initiated on December 27, 2024, this legal matter pertains to an Patent issue based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. It's important to mention that Plaintiff has requested a jury for this case. | |
|
Delaware, December 23, 2024 ⚖ Case 1:2024cv01409 In a legal showdown that reverberates with intensity, the corridors of the US District Court for the District of Delaware echo with the clash between OptiMorphix, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. Dated December 23, 2024, this legal saga, identified by docket number case 1:2024cv01409, thrusts into the spotlight with a passionate fervor. The battleground? A tumultuous arena of contractual conflicts encapsulated under the umbrella of "Patent" as per 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. However, amidst this legal storm, what ignites the flames of anticipation is Plaintiff's adamant insistence on a jury trial. It's a bold, unyielding stance, signaling a zealous yearning for resolution through the judgment of peers in this emotionally charged confrontation. | |