Case Search California (CA)

This search feature provides access to information.

Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!


Participant Index
A -> Abbas...(click to open)   Abbas, Nasir
  Aboud, Saddam
  Aktiengesellschaft, Unaxis
B -> BIASE...(click to open)   BIASE, Donald
  Bus, Vanhool
C -> Carney...(click to open)   Carney, Ingrid
D -> Duffy...(click to open)   Duffy, Bernadette
G -> Gurrola...(click to open)   Gurrola, Oscar
  Gurrola, Rosalva
I -> ISAACS...(click to open)   ISAACS, Jeffrey
  Ibrahim, Ilham
  Individual, A
J -> Jumali...(click to open)   Jumali, Ilham
K -> KEENAN...(click to open)   KEENAN, James
  Khalef, Hamid
R -> R...(click to open)   R, Al
W -> Widow...(click to open)   Widow, As
A -> al...(click to open)   al, Et
I -> individual...(click to open)   individual, An

California,   February 27, 2007
Case 3:2007cv01153/189640
In the US District Court for the Northern District of California case 3:2007cv01153/189640, Ingrid & Isabel, Inc. and Ingrid Carney files a suit against Mothers Work, Inc., Ingrid Carney and Ingrid & Isabel, Inc. The filing date was February 27, 2007, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement. Presiding over the case is Judge Joseph C. Spero. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ✅ Ingrid Carney, ✅ Ingrid Carney 
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
United States 545, 855.00 in United States Currency, 14, 880.00 in United States Currency and Vanhool Coach Bus 2001, Vin #YE2SC11B712042215
[Case # 07-1347], [Filed: February 14, 2007]
[ Drug Related Property Seizures§ ⚖ ]

✅ Vanhool Coach Bus, ✅ Vin #YESCB >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA $148, 840.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
[Case # 07-2142], [Filed: June 08, 2007]
[ Drug Related Seizure of Property§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
California,   April 13, 2007
Case 3:2007mc80102/191189
A legal case marked by the docket number case 3:2007mc80102/191189 was filed on April 13, 2007. It involves Intevac Inc as the plaintiff and Unaxis Balzers LTD, Unaxis USA Inc. and Unaxis Balzers Aktiengesellschaft, Intevac Inc as the defendant. The nature of the suit pertains to Other, falling under the jurisdiction of US District Court for the Northern District of California, presided over by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton.
More Information about >>> ✅ Unaxis Balzers Aktiengesellschaft 
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Ilham Nassir Ibrahim
More Information
An individual
More Information
as Widow and personal representative of the Estate of Akram Hanoush Yakou a deceased Individual
More Information
Saddam Saleh Aboud
More Information
Nasir Khalaf Abbas
More Information
Ilham Mohamed Hamza Al Jumali
More Information
Hamid Ahmed Khalef and Al Aid Mhmod Hussein Abo R
More Information
Titan Corporation and CACI Premier Technology, Inc.
[Case # case 08-7009], [Filed: January 29, 2008]
[ Other Personal Injury§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Federal Trade Commission State of Florida By Attorney General Robert A. Butterworth
More Information
State of Illinois By Attorney General James E. Ryan
More Information
State of Minnesota By Attorney General Hubert H. Humphrey
More Information
III State of New York By Attorney General Dennis C.
More Information
Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc. and Cambrex Corporation
[Case # case 08-5044], [Filed: February 29, 2008]
[ Other Statutory Actions§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Federal Trade Commission State of Florida By Attorney General Robert A. Butterworth
More Information
State of Illinois By Attorney General James E. Ryan
More Information
State of Minnesota By Attorney General Hubert H. Humphrey
More Information
III State of New York By Attorney General Dennis C.
More Information
Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc. and Cambrex Corporation
[Case # case 08-5045], [Filed: February 29, 2008]
[ Other Statutory Actions§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 72, 100.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
[Case # 08-4041], [Filed: February 27, 2008]
[ Food and Drugs Acts§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
CHERYL LEE CRAIG EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
[Case # 08-15451], [Filed: March 05, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
CROMPTON COLORS INC and CROMPTON CORP INTL TEXTILE GRP INC
[Case # 08-1755], [Filed: March 18, 2008]
[ Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
AZMAT J. RAZA and SYED IRSHAD RAZA DONALD V. BIASE, through TDP, et al
[Case # 08-1891], [Filed: March 27, 2008]
[ Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158§ ⚖ ]

✅ DONALD V. BIASE, ✅ et al >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
JAMES W. KEENAN and JUDY M. KEENAN ROSS M. PYLE, PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH, a business entity and JEFFREY S. ISAACS
[Case # 08-55780], [Filed: May 09, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

✅ JEFFREY S. ISAACS >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 72, 100.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
[Case # 08-4085], [Filed: May 14, 2008]
[ Food and Drugs Acts§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Oscar Gurrola
More Information
Rosalva Gurrola and Bernadette Carol Duffy
More Information
United States of America
[Case # case 08-5174], [Filed: May 30, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
California,   January 04, 2007
Case 5:2007cv00040/187737
The legal proceedings in case 5:2007cv00040/187737 at US District Court for the Northern District of California involve Infobahn Softworld, Inc. and Bccusa, Inc., Infobahn Softworld, Inc. Filed on January 04, 2007, this case focuses on Contract: Other based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract. Judge Howard R. Lloyd, Ronald M. Whyte is presiding, and it's notable that Both have requested a jury trial.


Court records are widely used for a multitude of purposes, but whatever your specific reason, their main objective is to provide information.

To put it simply, court records provide data in black and white. Ask a Lawyer

Leave a Comment