Case Search California (CA)

This search feature provides access to information.

Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!

California,   January 04, 2024
Case 4:2024cv00079/423056
At the US District Court for the Northern District of California, the legal case 4:2024cv00079/423056 involves Isaac Shapiro and Sellers International LLC. Filed on January 04, 2024, this case deals with Other Statutory Actions based on 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question. Judge Donna M Ryu is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ᐅ Isaac Shapiro 
California,   January 04, 2024
Case 3:2024cv00022/775349
At the US District Court for the Southern District of California, case 3:2024cv00022/775349 involves Irina Collier suing Summer Sabraw, Alana Robinson, Charles Wade Collier, Bruce Briden Ritchie and Daniel Sweeney. Filed on January 04, 2024, this case addresses issues related to Civil Rights: Other based on 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question. The case is presided over by Judge Michael S Berg, with Referring Judge Linda Lopez also involved. Remarkably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury to hear this case.
More Information about >>> ᐅ Irina Collier, ᐅ Summer Sabraw, ᐅ Alana Robinson, ᐅ Charles Wade Collier, ᐅ Bruce Briden Ritchie, ᐅ Daniel Sweeney 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: DAVID M. BILLMAN
More Information
JOSSETTE OKEREKE, Warden
[Case # 23-4013], [Filed: December 19, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ JOSSETTE OKEREKE
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
DEAN TRANUNITED STATES
[Case # 23-2085], [Filed: December 19, 2023]
[ Other Statutory Actions§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: KEVIN A. JORDAN
More Information
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
[Case # 23-14091], [Filed: December 19, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
INSURANCE MARKETING COALITION LTD.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 23-14125], [Filed: December 21, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: BONDARY MCCALL
More Information
CLERK - NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, JOHN OR JANE DOE, REBECCA and STEPHANIE
[Case # 23-14099], [Filed: December 19, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 150 AFL-CIONational Labor Relations Board
[Case # case 23-1343], [Filed: December 19, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ National Labor Relations Board
California,   December 29, 2023
Case 5:2023cv06696/422884
US District Court for the Northern District of California case 5:2023cv06696/422884 comprises Ivy Chang and United States of America and Ras M. Wollega. Filed on December 29, 2023, this case concerns Motor Vehicle based on 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim. Judge Susan van Keulen is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ᐅ Ivy Chang, ᐅ Ras M. Wollega 
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Imelda Aguirre
More Information
Martin O'Malley
[Case # 2023cv06716/422904], [Filed: December 29, 2023]
[ Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV§42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: CHARLES ROGERS
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 23-3992], [Filed: December 12, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
ISAIAH L. DUNBAR
More Information
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
[Case # 23-14034], [Filed: December 12, 2023]
[ Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: MARIO ANTON LEEUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 23-14033], [Filed: December 12, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: WARNER
More Information
NORCROSS & JUDD
MICHAEL KINGEN and KELLEY RAMSEY
[Case # 23-108], [Filed: December 11, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ MICHAEL KINGEN, ᐅ KELLEY RAMSEY
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: RUSSELL JOHN NESTORUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 23-14020], [Filed: December 11, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JOHN R. DEMOSATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
[Case # 23-14018], [Filed: December 11, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ ATTORNEY GENERAL
California,   December 11, 2023
Case 2:2023cv10426/909191
At the US District Court for the Central District of California, case 2:2023cv10426/909191 involves Immanuel Christian Price suing Sergeant McDuffy, Sergeant Salazar and Associate Warden S. Rivera. Filed on December 11, 2023, this case addresses issues related to Prisoner: Civil Rights based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights. The case is presided over by Judge R Gary Klausner, with Referring Judge Sheri Pym also involved. No jury trial has been requested.
More Information about >>> ᐅ Immanuel Christian Price, ᐅ Sergeant McDuffy, ᐅ Sergeant Salazar, ᐅ Associate Warden S. Rivera 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: WALTER DRUMMOND
More Information
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
[Case # 23-14021], [Filed: December 11, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: EARNEST J. FILES
More Information
JR.
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
[Case # 23-14017], [Filed: December 11, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JAMES DOUUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 23-3186], [Filed: December 19, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

California,   December 29, 2023
Case 4:2023cv06704/422892
At the US District Court for the Northern District of California, the legal case 4:2023cv06704/422892 entails Ismael Antonio Rodriguez Perez and First Tech Federal Credit Union. The filing date is December 29, 2023, and this case deals with Civil Rights: Other as per 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights. Judge Thomas S Hixson is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded.
More Information about >>> ᐅ Ismael Antonio Rodriguez Perez 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JOSHUA D. JETTUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 23-6018], [Filed: November 20, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: ANDRE MONTEEK EDWARDS
More Information
KIM CARGOR, Warden
[Case # 23-2064], [Filed: December 12, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Itzel Mendez
More Information
United Parcel Service, Inc.
[Case # 2023cv10618/909225], [Filed: December 19, 2023]
[ Civil Rights: Jobs§28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination ⚖ ]
[jury demanded by Both]
California,   December 19, 2023
Case 2:2023cv10615/909217
In Case Number case 2:2023cv10615/909217, Ismael Tamayo takes legal action against CITY OF LOS ANGELES in the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. Filed on December 19, 2023, this case involves an Civil Rights: Other matter under 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act. Notably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case.
More Information about >>> ᐅ Ismael Tamayo 
California,   December 26, 2023
Case 1:2023at01058/439256
I.L. initiates legal proceedings (case 1:2023at01058/439256) against Six Flags Entertainment Corp. and Magic Mountain LLC at the US District Court for the Eastern District of California. The case, filed on December 26, 2023, pertains to Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other under 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act. Notably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this matter.
California,   December 26, 2023
Case 1:2023cv01769/439262
At the US District Court for the Eastern District of California, case 1:2023cv01769/439262 involves I.L. suing Six Flags Entertainment Corp. and Magic Mountain LLC. Filed on December 26, 2023, this case addresses issues related to Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other based on 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act. The case is presided over by Judge No District Court Judge, with Referring Judge Christopher D Baker also involved. Remarkably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury to hear this case.
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
INTOUCH MARKETING
More Information
INC. Guardian Ad Litem d/b/a INTOUCH MEDICAL MARKETING and QUALITY HEALTH PARTNERS INC.
MANUEL ANZALDUA and YULIANA ESPINOZA
[Case # 2023cv02457/909768], [Filed: December 26, 2023]
[ Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016)§ ⚖ ]
[jury demanded by Plaintiff]
ᐅ MANUEL ANZALDUA, ᐅ YULIANA ESPINOZA
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: Elizabeth Wright and Dick Law Firm
More Information
P.L.L.C.
ASI Lloyds
[Case # 23-40712], [Filed: December 26, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: NATHANIEL NYAMEKYE
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 23-3218], [Filed: December 26, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   DefendantRespondent
In re: KEITH P. SEQUEIRA and HELEN D. SEQUEIRA
More Information
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO and GEORGETTE CASTNER
[Case # 23-3262], [Filed: December 27, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ GEORGETTE CASTNER
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: VERSIAH M. TAYLOR
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 23-14183], [Filed: December 27, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: TERRY LEE BATTLEATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
[Case # 23-14182], [Filed: December 27, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ ATTORNEY GENERAL
California,   December 20, 2023
Case 3:2023cv06551/422596
At the US District Court for the Northern District of California, the legal case 3:2023cv06551/422596 involves Irma Ross and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Filed on December 20, 2023, this case deals with Truth in Lending based on 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending. Judge Alex G Tse is overseeing the proceedings, and it's worth noting that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ᐅ Irma Ross 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: CARL LEE BLACKMONATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
[Case # 23-14151], [Filed: December 26, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: BABUBHAI PATEL
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 23-2105], [Filed: December 27, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
IRIS XIOMARA LARIOSMERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
[Case # 23-2087], [Filed: December 20, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ MERRICK B. GARLAND, ᐅ Attorney General
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: ARCHIE M. WHALEN
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 23-6111], [Filed: December 20, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Irvine Promenade Apts IV LLCJordan Hamilton, Does 1 to 5 and Denise Lane
[Case # 2023cv02419/909917], [Filed: December 20, 2023]
[ Real Property: Other§ ⚖ ]
[Judge: Cormac J Carney] , [John D Early]
ᐅ Jordan Hamilton, ᐅ Does to, ᐅ Denise Lane
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JOHNNY TIPPINS
More Information
ADAM DOUGLAS
[Case # 23-2090], [Filed: December 20, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: ANGELA W. DEBOSE
More Information
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES
[Case # 23-12235], [Filed: July 10, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: MICHAEL S. GORBEY
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 23-12236], [Filed: July 10, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: ELMER REEDUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 23-12237], [Filed: July 10, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Interstate Natural Gas Association of AmericaPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration and United States Department of Transportation
[Case # case 23-1173], [Filed: July 10, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: RICARDO DAVIS
More Information
DONNA CURLING, COALITION FOR GOOD GOVERNANCE, DONNA PRICE, JEFFREY SCHOENBERG and LAURA DIGGES
[Case # 23-14168], [Filed: December 27, 2023]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ DONNA CURLING, ᐅ DONNA PRICE, ᐅ JEFFREY SCHOENBERG, ᐅ LAURA DIGGES
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
IMAGE PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES LLCLG ELECTRONICS INC. and LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC.
[Case # case 23-2136], [Filed: July 10, 2023]
[ Patent Infringement (Fed. Qst.)§ ⚖ ]

Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
DIOMARAH E. ISAAC
More Information
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES
[Case # 23-2065], [Filed: December 27, 2023]
[ Employment§ ⚖ ]


Court records are widely used for a multitude of purposes, but whatever your specific reason, their main objective is to provide information.

To put it simply, court records provide data in black and white. Ask a Lawyer

Leave a Comment