This search feature provides access to information.

Case Search California (CA)


Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!

Participant Index
ABERNATHY, COREY
ADAMS, DUJUAN
BACON, ANTHONY
BARKLEY, RASHAUN
CARACCIOLO, JOSEPH
CLAYBORNE, VANDER
Coronel, Ismael
DAVIS, PHEDREK
EWING, MARIO
Ezerzer, Marcelle
FIGUEROA-RAMOS, ISAIAS
Ford, Fiesta
GENERAL, ATTORNEY
GENOVESE, KEVIN
Gant, Isaac
General, Attorney
Greenberg, Mark
HAMMOND, JEREMY
HARPER, CARLOS
HEMPHILL, R.
Harris, Ira
JACKSON, EDDIE
JACKSON, SHANE
JIVIDEN, BERNARD
JOSEPHS, DARON
Janfaza, Ilan
John, a/k/a
KOTSONIS, STEVEN
Lewis, Jason
Monroe, Rondell
Mudarris, Anthony
NICHOLS, BILLY
RAHEEM, IDRIS
ROSARIO, MIGUEL
SHOWERS, SHEILA
SMITH, CHRISTOPHER
STUART, LEROY
TATAR, SERDAR
TERRY, DALONE
TRAMMELL, TREVOR
WAINWRIGHT, LYNEAL
WALTON, LEATRICE
Wei, Dai
YOUNG, JUSTON
ZIMMER, DARYL
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
I. K. OBO Z. S.MONTCLAIR BOARD OF EDUCATION
[Case # 19-3503], [Filed: October 31, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JUSTON LABARON YOUNG
More Information
SHANE JACKSON, Warden
[Case # 19-2285], [Filed: November 05, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ SHANE JACKSON >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
IDRIS RAHEEM
More Information
LEATRICE W. WALTON, as (CSE Hearing Officer) in their official capacities as employees and contractors of the title IV-D Agency:, SHEILA SHOWERS, as (Operations Consultant of Title IV-D Agency), R. CRAIG HEMPHILL, Contractor, PA of Dept of Revenue CSE: in
[Case # 19-14311], [Filed: October 30, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ LEATRICE W. WALTON, ᐅ SHEILA SHOWERS, ᐅ R. CRAIG HEMPHILL >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JOHN P. MORROWUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-6240], [Filed: October 30, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICAUNDER SEAL and JEREMY HAMMOND, In re: GRAND JURY SUBPOENA
[Case # 19-2201], [Filed: October 30, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ JEREMY HAMMOND >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: SERDAR TATAR
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-3460], [Filed: October 30, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: EDDIE ALLEN JACKSON
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-2269], [Filed: October 30, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: EXTREME TECHNOLOGIES
More Information
STABIL DRILL SPECIALTIES, L.L.C.
[Case # case 20-106], [Filed: October 30, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: DARYL L. ZIMMER
More Information
JACK KOWALSKI
[Case # 19-2265], [Filed: October 30, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: DARON JOSEPHS
More Information
PROSECUTOR CAMDEN COUNTY
[Case # 19-3488], [Filed: October 30, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: STEVEN THOMAS KOTSONIS
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-6207], [Filed: October 23, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: TREVOR J. TRAMMELL
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-4035], [Filed: October 23, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: TERRY LYNN COOPERNOAH NAGY, Warden
[Case # 19-2239], [Filed: October 23, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JOSEPH A. CARACCIOLO
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-3396], [Filed: October 23, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: CARLOS GASPER HARPER
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-2241], [Filed: October 23, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: BERNARD ROOSEVELT SHAWUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-6289], [Filed: November 15, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
PlaintiffPetitioner   versus   Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICALEROY ANGLOSON STUART, a/k/a John
[Case # 19-7712], [Filed: November 15, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ LEROY ANGLOSON STUART, ᐅ a/k/a John >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: DALONE MARCELL TERRY
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-2334], [Filed: November 15, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Buckskin Realty
More Information
Mark D. Greenberg and Greenberg and Greenberg
[Case # 19-3828], [Filed: November 15, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ Mark D. Greenberg >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: MARIO EWING
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-6239], [Filed: October 30, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: MIGUEL ANGEL ROSARIO
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-3627], [Filed: November 15, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
California,   November 15, 2019
Case 8:2019cv02223/764769
Initiated as Case Number case 8:2019cv02223/764769, International License Exchange of America, LLC files a lawsuit against D-Link Systems, Inc. at the US District Court for the Central District of California. Filed on November 15, 2019, this case revolves around Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. Judge Karen E Scott presides over the case, and Referring Judge James V Selna is also part of the proceedings. It's essential to note that Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case.
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Ismael Coronel
More Information
Ford Motor Company, Fiesta Ford, Inc., DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and Fiesta Ford
[Case # 2019cv09841/764814], [Filed: November 15, 2019]
[ Contract Product Liability§28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal ⚖ ]
[Judge: Dale S Fischer] , [John E McDermott] [jury demanded by Both]
ᐅ Fiesta Ford, ᐅ Fiesta Ford >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
ILLINOIS TAMALE CO.EL-GREG, INC.
[Case # 19-3055], [Filed: October 18, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: ALLEN DEAN ARMSTRONGGREG SKIPPER, Warden
[Case # 19-2271], [Filed: October 30, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: CHRISTOPHER K. SMITH
More Information
KEVIN GENOVESE, Warden
[Case # 19-6237], [Filed: October 30, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ KEVIN GENOVESE >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: COREY ABERNATHY
More Information
WARDEN
[Case # 19-6183], [Filed: October 18, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
ISAIAS FIGUEROA-RAMOS
More Information
AKA Isais Figueroa-Ramos
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
[Case # 19-72679], [Filed: October 23, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ Attorney General >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: BILLY WAYNE NICHOLS
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-6188], [Filed: October 18, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
iFinex Inc.Citibank, N.A.
[Case # 2019mc00022/762102], [Filed: October 18, 2019]
[ Other Statutory Actions§ ⚖ ]
[Judge: Autumn D Spaeth]
>>> More Information
California,   October 18, 2019
Case 8:2019cv01984/762056
Initiated as Case Number case 8:2019cv01984/762056, Innovative Health LLC files a lawsuit against Biosense Webster, Inc. at the US District Court for the Central District of California. Filed on October 18, 2019, this case revolves around Anti-Trust under 15 U.S.C. § 0001. Judge Karen E Scott presides over the case, and Referring Judge James V Selna is also part of the proceedings. It's essential to note that Plaintiff has demanded a jury for this case.
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
iFinex Inc.Rondell Clyde Monroe
[Case # 2019mc00021/762097], [Filed: October 18, 2019]
[ Other Statutory Actions§ ⚖ ]
[Judge: Karen E Scott]
ᐅ Rondell Clyde Monroe >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
IRA L. JACKSONATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
[Case # 19-14547], [Filed: November 15, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ ATTORNEY GENERAL >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: BERNARD R. JIVIDEN
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-6234], [Filed: October 30, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: RASHAUN BARKLEY
More Information
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ESSEX COUNTY
[Case # 19-3381], [Filed: October 18, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: DUJUAN ADAMS
More Information
LYNEAL WAINWRIGHT, Warden
[Case # 19-4018], [Filed: October 18, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ LYNEAL WAINWRIGHT >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: ROY ROBINSONDISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
[Case # 19-3553], [Filed: November 04, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ira B. Harris
More Information
Jason Lewis
[Case # 19-3376], [Filed: November 04, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ Jason Lewis >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JARRON DEONTE KINGTONY MAYS
[Case # 19-6257], [Filed: November 04, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
ITN Holdings Ltd. a British Virgin Islands Company and ITN Holdings Ltd.Dai Wei
[Case # 2019cv09483/763667], [Filed: November 04, 2019]
[ Other Statutes: Arbitration§09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award ⚖ ]
[Judge: Patrick J Walsh] , [George H Wu]
ᐅ Dai Wei >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: VANDER CLAYBORNE
More Information
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
[Case # 19-3444], [Filed: October 24, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: PHEDREK T. DAVIS
More Information
KEVIN GENOVESE, Warden
[Case # 19-6205], [Filed: October 24, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ KEVIN GENOVESE >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES AND SYSTEMS CORPORATION dba ID TechSAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
[Case # case 20-1077], [Filed: October 24, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JUSTON LABARON YOUNG
More Information
SHANE JACKSON, Wardem
[Case # 19-2246], [Filed: October 24, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ SHANE JACKSON >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: MICHAEL WAYNE LONGANNA VALENTINE, Warden
[Case # 19-6224], [Filed: October 29, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: ANTHONY BACON
More Information
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-3437], [Filed: October 24, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
California,   October 24, 2019
Case 3:2019cv06922/350360
The legal proceedings in case 3:2019cv06922/350360 at US District Court for the Northern District of California involve Isaac Gant and JUUL Labs Inc. Filed on October 24, 2019, this case focuses on Personal Injury: Other based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Judge William H Orrick is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
More Information about >>> ᐅ Isaac Gant 
California,   October 24, 2019
Case 2:2019cv09183/762683
Initiated in case 2:2019cv09183/762683, Ilan N. Rosen Janfaza brings forth legal action against Anthony Omar Mudarris, Royal Palace Royal Girls Cabaret, LLC, 7180 Sunset Blvd., Inc., Marcelle Ezerzer, Synn Gentlemen's Club, Does 5-50, inclusive, Does 1-2, inclusive, Synn Gentlemens Club and Doe at the US District Court for the Central District of California. Filed on October 24, 2019, this case pertains to Assault Libel & Slander grounded in 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Presiding Judge Percy Anderson oversees the proceedings, with Referring Judge Maria A Audero involved, and no jury has been requested.
More Information about >>> ᐅ Ilan N. Rosen Janfaza, ᐅ Anthony Omar Mudarris, ᐅ Marcelle Ezerzer, ᐅ Does - 
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: CHRISTOPHER LEE CORNELLUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-4043], [Filed: October 24, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: MONTEZ HALLUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 19-6223], [Filed: October 29, 2019]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

>>> More Information


Court records are widely used for a multitude of purposes, but whatever your specific reason, their main objective is to provide information.

To put it simply, court records provide data in black and white. Ask a Lawyer

Leave a Comment