Case Search California (CA)

Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!

Participant Index

A -> ALLENWOOD...(click to open)

  ALLENWOOD, Warden
  ANDREWS, Sylvester
  Associates, Tehachapi

B -> BENJAMIN...(click to open)

  BENJAMIN, Trevor
  BRANHAM, Adrian
  BUCKWALTER, Ronald
  Bobmanuel, Ineye
  Brown, J.

C -> CASILLA...(click to open)

  CASILLA, Bienvenido
  CINTAO, Tomas
  Cleveland, Ivan

D -> DAWKINS...(click to open)

  DAWKINS, Jeffrey
  DOUGHTERY, Kenneth

F -> FOWLER...(click to open)

  FOWLER, Leotis

H -> HARRIS...(click to open)

  HARRIS, Johnny
  HENRY, Clifford
  Heinemann, Robert

I -> Irizarry...(click to open)

  Irizarry, Isaac
  Isasi, Richard

J -> JACKSON...(click to open)

  JACKSON, Anthony
  JACKSON, Frank
  JACKSON, Hubert

M -> MASON...(click to open)

  MASON, Jeffery
  MCCUTCHEON, Rodney
  MILTON, Jessie
  MOLESKI, David
  MONTGOMERY, Duane
  MURPHY, William

N -> NIEMAN...(click to open)

  NIEMAN, Elaine
  NIEMAN, By

O -> OLICK...(click to open)

  OLICK, Thomas

P -> POONJA...(click to open)

  POONJA, Mohamed

R -> REYNOLDS...(click to open)

  REYNOLDS, Michael
  RODRIGUEZ, Edwin

S -> SAMUELS...(click to open)

  SAMUELS, Charles
  SHIVERS, Mackie
  SMITH, Eugene
  STRADFORD, Terrance
  Sanchez, Fernando
  Staich, Ivan

W -> WHITE...(click to open)

  WHITE, Charles
  WHITE, Howard
  WILKINSON, Ayando
  WOLFSON, Freda
  WYLEY, Verneel

California,   October 03, 2013 ⚖ Case 1:2013cv01600/259879 In the US District Court for the Eastern District of California, the case 1:2013cv01600/259879 involves Isaac Irizarry and Tehachapi Housing Associates, L.P., The Michaels Organization and Interstate Realty Management Company. Filed on October 03, 2013, this case pertains to Housing/Accommodations under 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Presiding over this matter is Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill, Jennifer L. Thurston. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Isaac Irizarry, ✅ Tehachapi Housing Associates  …
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
THOMAS W. OLICK More Information	CITY OF EASTON, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PORTNOFF LAW ASSOCIATES, SAL PANTO, HOWARD WHITE and WILLIAM MURPHY
[Case # 13-4109], [Filed: October 17, 2013] [ Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158§ ⚖ ] ✅ HOWARD WHITE, ✅ WILLIAM MURPHY >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Isaac Irizarry More Information	The Michaels Organization, Tehachapi Housing Associates, L.P. and Interstate Realty Management Company
[Case # 2013at00717/259821], [Filed: October 03, 2013] [ Civil Rights: Accommodations§42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act ⚖ ] ✅ Tehachapi Housing Associates >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: HERBERT JENA	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-11068], [Filed: October 03, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS More Information	UNITED STATES ATTORNEY MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
[Case # 13-4119], [Filed: October 17, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: MACKIE L. SHIVERS More Information JR.	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-14758], [Filed: October 17, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JOHNNY HARRIS More Information	ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
[Case # 13-14761], [Filed: October 17, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: MACKIE L. SHIVERS More Information JR.	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-14763], [Filed: October 17, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
California,   October 17, 2013 ⚖ Case 2:2013cv07692/574141 The legal case indexed as case 2:2013cv07692/574141 was initiated on October 17, 2013. The involved parties include Insight Equity APX LP as the plaintiff and Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd. as the defendant. This case, categorized under Patent, is under the jurisdiction of Judge Charles F. Eick, Consuelo B. Marshall.
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: RODNEY MCCUTCHEON More Information	ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
[Case # 13-14762], [Filed: October 17, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JASON SMART-EL	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NOEL L. HILLMAN
[Case # 13-4120], [Filed: October 17, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: EUGENE SMITH More Information	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-14828], [Filed: October 21, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: LARRY EARL RENO	ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-14826], [Filed: October 21, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   DefendantRespondent
In re: TREVOR BENJAMIN More Information	CHARLES E. SAMUELS, WARDEN ALLENWOOD and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-4146], [Filed: October 21, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ✅ CHARLES E. SAMUELS, ✅ WARDEN ALLENWOOD >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: FRANK JACKSON More Information	ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
[Case # 13-14825], [Filed: October 21, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Richard Isasi More Information	Robert C. Heinemann, Clerk of the Court and Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of the Court
[Case # 13-3977], [Filed: October 21, 2013] [ PRISONER PET-Civil Rights§ ⚖ ] ✅ Robert C. Heinemann >>> More Information
California,   October 21, 2013 ⚖ Case 5:2013cv04863/271164 In case 5:2013cv04863/271164 within US District Court for the Northern District of California, Illinois Union Insurance Company brings a case against Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Filed on October 21, 2013, this legal matter relates to Insurance as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The presiding judge is Jon S. Tigar, and the Plaintiff has made a request for a jury trial.
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Iowa Public Employee's Retirement System	Deloitte & Touche LLP
[Case # 13-3951], [Filed: October 21, 2013] [ STATUTES-Secur Comm Exchange§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JESSIE MILTON More Information	ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-14834], [Filed: October 21, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: ADRIAN CORNELIUS BRANHAM More Information	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-14827], [Filed: October 21, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JEFFERY LAMAR MASON More Information	ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
[Case # 13-14764], [Filed: October 17, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: TROY LILLIE LEAH FARR KENNETH DOUGHTERY More Information CHARLES WHITE More Information MARTHA JEAN WITMER and ET AL	OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS STATE OF LOUISIANA, SEI INVESTMENTS COMPANY, SEI PRIVATE TRUST COMPANY, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON, INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, NUTMEG INSURANCE COMPANY, ARCH INSURANC
[Case # 13-11084], [Filed: October 08, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
California,   October 08, 2013 ⚖ Case 4:2013cv04680/270902 In the US District Court for the Northern District of California, the case 4:2013cv04680/270902 involves Ivan Von Staich and Voegele, Pido and California Men's Colony-East Medical Doctors. Filed on October 08, 2013, this case pertains to Prison Condition under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Presiding over this matter is Judge PSLC RMH, Kandis A. Westmore. There is no demand for a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Ivan Von Staich  …
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
In re: PATRICIA R. GRAY	PENNYMAC CORPORATION
[Case # 13-4001], [Filed: October 08, 2013] [ Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   DefendantRespondent
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA	In re: DAVID MOLESKI
[Case # 13-4031], [Filed: October 08, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ✅ DAVID MOLESKI >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: DANA W. WILEY	DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
[Case # 13-4029], [Filed: October 08, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: I. C. MARIA PINO and TOMAS CINTAO	SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP, d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE, RONALD L. BUCKWALTER
[Case # 13-4192], [Filed: October 23, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ✅ RONALD L. BUCKWALTER >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JEFFREY DAWKINS More Information	DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
[Case # 13-4191], [Filed: October 23, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: TERRANCE D. STRADFORD More Information	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FREDA L. WOLFSON
[Case # 13-4167], [Filed: October 23, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ✅ FREDA L. WOLFSON >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ineye Dakoureye Bobmanuel More Information	United States of America
[Case # 13-3356], [Filed: October 23, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: HUBERT JACKSON More Information	ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI
[Case # 13-4178], [Filed: October 23, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: SYLVESTER ANDREWS More Information	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PAUL S. DIAMOND
[Case # 13-4185], [Filed: October 23, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: AYANDO E. WILKINSON More Information	ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
[Case # 13-14906], [Filed: October 23, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
MOHAMED POONJA More Information Trustee	D.P.M.S., INC., DBA Danco Machine
[Case # 13-17142], [Filed: October 23, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
California,   October 23, 2013 ⚖ Case 1:2013at00767/260503 Case Number case 1:2013at00767/260503 in the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama involves Imperium Insurance Company formerly known as Delos Insurance Company's lawsuit against Unigard Insurance Company, Fernando Sanchez and Agri Mix Transport, Inc. formerly known as Juarez Brothers Trucking, Inc. Filed on October 23, 2013, this legal action relates to an Insurance claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Notably, Plaintiff has demanded a jury to hear this case. More Information about >>> ✅ Fernando Sanchez  …
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: VERNEEL A. WYLEY More Information	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-14904], [Filed: October 23, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: HUGH E. REID	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-14974], [Filed: October 28, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: ELAINE NIEMAN More Information Individually and M. N. by ELAINE NIEMAN More Information Guardian	SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP, d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE, RONALD L. BUCKWALTER
[Case # 13-4193], [Filed: October 23, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ✅ RONALD L. BUCKWALTER >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
INTERSTATE PACKAGING COMPANY	CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ACE FIRE UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPAN
[Case # 13-6395], [Filed: October 28, 2013] [ Contract: Insurance§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: CLIFFORD HENRY More Information	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-14975], [Filed: October 28, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ivan Vernord Cleveland More Information	State of California and J. Brown
[Case # 2013cv05005/271388], [Filed: October 28, 2013] [ General§28 U.S.C. § 2254 ⚖ ] [Judge: Saundra Brown Armstrong, PSLC GRC] ✅ J. Brown >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
In re: DANIEL LUKE SPUCK	DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLEARFIELD COUNTY
[Case # 13-4214], [Filed: October 28, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
WESTAMERICA BANK	MENDOCINO COAST RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT
[Case # 13-17185], [Filed: October 28, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: BIENVENIDO CASILLA More Information	ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
[Case # 13-4201], [Filed: October 28, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: MARVIN LEE HOLLEY	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-14978], [Filed: October 28, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: DUANE MONTGOMERY More Information	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-2454], [Filed: October 28, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: ANTHONY N. JACKSON More Information	MARK KIRBY, Warden and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
[Case # 13-4209], [Filed: October 28, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
California,   October 23, 2013 ⚖ Case 5:2013cv04908/271316 In the US District Court for the Northern District of California case 5:2013cv04908/271316, Institute For Information Industry, Institute For Information Industry files a suit against LucidWorks, Inc., Google Inc. The filing date was October 23, 2013, and this case concerns Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. Presiding over the case is Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Both have requested a jury trial.
Plaintiff   versus   DefendantRespondent
LEOTIS FOWLER More Information	H. L. HUFFORD
[Case # 13-4166], [Filed: October 23, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: EDWIN RODRIGUEZ More Information	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 13-4164], [Filed: October 23, 2013] [ Other§ ⚖ ] >>> More Information

NationwideAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaPuerto RicoRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming

  1 ...   196   197   198   199   200   201   202 ...   619

Court records are widely used for a multitude of purposes, but whatever your specific reason, their main objective is to provide information.

To put it simply, court records provide data in black and white. Ask a Lawyer