This search feature provides access to information.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
Participant Index
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
|
Eduviges Vilchisgonzalez
More Information |
Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| [Case # 2025cv04392], [Filed: May 15, 2025] [ Contract: Other§28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract ⚖ ] [jury demanded by Both] >>> More Information |
|
|
California, May 15, 2025 ⚖ Case 2:2025cv04385 In a legal showdown that reverberates with intensity, the corridors of the US District Court for the Central District of California echo with the clash between Elridge Lee Titus Jr. and Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and FAMILY DOLLAR, LLC (DOE 1). Dated May 15, 2025, this legal saga, identified by docket number case 2:2025cv04385, thrusts into the spotlight with a passionate fervor. The battleground? A tumultuous arena of contractual conflicts encapsulated under the umbrella of "Personal Property: Other" as per 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury. However, amidst this legal storm, what ignites the flames of anticipation is Defendant's adamant insistence on a jury trial. It's a bold, unyielding stance, signaling a zealous yearning for resolution through the judgment of peers in this emotionally charged confrontation. More Information about >>> ✅ Elridge Lee Titus … | |
|
California, May 15, 2025 ⚖ Case 2:2025cv04400 In a legal showdown that reverberates with intensity, the corridors of the US District Court for the Central District of California echo with the clash between Edmond Neal and Libazi, Inc. doing business as Arturo's Shoe Fixx and Filmore Capital LLC. Dated May 15, 2025, this legal saga, identified by docket number case 2:2025cv04400, thrusts into the spotlight with a passionate fervor. The battleground? A tumultuous arena of contractual conflicts encapsulated under the umbrella of "Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other" as per 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act. However, amidst this legal storm, what ignites the flames of anticipation is Plaintiff's adamant insistence on a jury trial. It's a bold, unyielding stance, signaling a zealous yearning for resolution through the judgment of peers in this emotionally charged confrontation. More Information about >>> ✅ Edmond Neal, ✅ Arturo's Shoe Fixx … | |
|
California, May 15, 2025 ⚖ Case 8:2025cv01031 In case 8:2025cv01031, Eddie Malluk initiates legal action against BWB Media Inc at the US District Court for the Central District of California. The case was filed on May 15, 2025 and involves matters related to Copyright under 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement. David O Carter presides over the case, and Referring Judge Douglas F McCormick is also involved. Interestingly, Plaintiff has demanded a jury to hear this case. More Information about >>> ✅ Eddie Malluk … | |
|
California, May 14, 2025 ⚖ Case 3:2025cv04166 In the US District Court for the Northern District of California case 3:2025cv04166, Elyas Waziri files a suit against Boehringer Ingelheim Fremont, Inc. The filing date was May 14, 2025, and this case concerns Labor: Other under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract. Presiding over the case is Judge Peter H Kang. The Plaintiff has requested a jury trial. More Information about >>> ✅ Elyas Waziri … | |
|
California, May 12, 2025 ⚖ Case 2:2025cv04272 In case 2:2025cv04272, Edge Property Management Inc initiates legal action against Joseph Little and Does 1 to 10 at the US District Court for the Central District of California. Filed on May 12, 2025, this case pertains to matters regarding Prop. Damage Prod. Liability under 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate. Presiding Judge Stephanie S Christensen oversees the case, with Referring Judge Consuelo B Marshall involved. Defendant has explicitly requested a jury for this litigation. More Information about >>> ✅ Joseph Little, ✅ Does to … | |
Court records are widely used for a multitude of purposes, but whatever your specific reason, their main objective is to provide information.
To put it simply, court records provide data in black and white. Ask a Lawyer