This search feature provides access to information.
Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| United States | Darius Terrel Whiting |
| [Case # 07-2935], [Filed: August 21, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ Darius Terrel Whiting | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | BROOKS JAMES TERRELL |
| [Case # 07-7223], [Filed: August 21, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ BROOKS JAMES TERRELL | |
| California, August 21, 2007 ⚖ Case 2:2007cv01712/166484, some of the participants — ᐅ Happy Camp … US District Court for the Eastern District of California case 2:2007cv01712/166484 comprises United States of America and Real Property Located at 6000 China Grade Road, Happy Camp, California. Filed on August 21, 2007, this case concerns Drug Related Seizure of Property based on 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate. Judge Edmund F. Brennan, William B. Shubb is overseeing the case, and there is no demand for a jury trial. | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | KERRY VAUGHN BLACKIE |
| [Case # 07-2002], [Filed: August 16, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ KERRY VAUGHN BLACKIE | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | LEONARDO GARCIA-FERNANDEZ |
| [Case # 07-51055], [Filed: August 23, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ LEONARDO GARCIA-FERNANDEZ | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | EVANGELIO ALVAREZ |
| [Case # 07-2193], [Filed: August 23, 2007] [ Prisoner Petitions -Vacate Sentence§ ⚖ ] ᐅ EVANGELIO ALVAREZ | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| United States | Matthew Powills |
| [Case # 07-2887], [Filed: August 16, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ Matthew Powills | |
| Petitioner versus Respondent | |
| United States of America | Mike Allen |
| [Case # 2007cv05454/394707], [Filed: August 21, 2007] [ Taxes§26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons ⚖ ] [Judge: Margaret A. Nagle, George H Wu] ᐅ Mike Allen | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | FELIPE CARDENAS-LANDIN |
| [Case # 07-50683], [Filed: May 31, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ FELIPE CARDENAS-LANDIN | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| United States | Meagan Elizabeth Montgomery |
| [Case # 07-2275], [Filed: May 31, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ Meagan Elizabeth Montgomery | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | EVANS RAY, JR., a/k/a Charlie, a/k/a Chucky, a/k/a Charles Evans Ray, Jr. |
| [Case # 07-4543], [Filed: May 31, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ a/k/a Charlie, ᐅ a/k/a Chucky, ᐅ a/k/a Charles Evans Ray | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | RAMIRO MAGDALENO |
| [Case # 07-10598], [Filed: May 31, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ RAMIRO MAGDALENO | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | KAREEM A. SAUNDERS |
| [Case # 07-4550], [Filed: May 31, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ KAREEM A. SAUNDERS | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | MARLON A. WHITE |
| [Case # 07-3153], [Filed: May 31, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ MARLON A. WHITE | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | KEVIN L. GEDDINGS |
| [Case # 07-4544], [Filed: May 31, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ KEVIN L. GEDDINGS | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | MAURICE MOUZON |
| [Case # 07-4540], [Filed: May 31, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ MAURICE MOUZON | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | CEDRICK BERNARD ALDERMAN |
| [Case # 07-30186], [Filed: May 31, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ CEDRICK BERNARD ALDERMAN | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | CHESTER GRIFFITHS |
| [Case # 07-4541], [Filed: May 31, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ CHESTER GRIFFITHS | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | RONNIE WILLIAMSON |
| [Case # 07-10602], [Filed: May 31, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ RONNIE WILLIAMSON | |
| Plaintiff versus Defendant | |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | ENTONYO ELIJAH JONES |
| [Case # 07-10606], [Filed: May 31, 2007] [ Other§ ⚖ ] ᐅ ENTONYO ELIJAH JONES | |
Court records are widely used for a multitude of purposes, but whatever your specific reason, their main objective is to provide information.
To put it simply, court records provide data in black and white. Ask a Lawyer