Case Search California (CA)

This search feature provides access to information.

Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!

Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
UNITED STATES$96, 822.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
[Case # 10-1777], [Filed: July 14, 2010]
[ Other (Forfeiture/Penalty)§ ⚖ ]

Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT OF VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY owner of the Tug William E. Polle for exoneration from or limitation of liabilityUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 10-1041], [Filed: January 12, 2010]
[ Marine Personal Injury§ ⚖ ]

California,   August 25, 2010
Case 2:2003cv08627/44134, some of the participants — ᐅ Edward M Wolkowitz, ᐅ Edward M Wolkowitz 

In the US District Court for the Central District of California, Imperial Credit Industries Inc and Edward M Wolkowitz and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in its capacity as receiver for Southern Pacific Bank, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in its corporate capacity and United States of America, Edward M Wolkowitz are involved in case 2:2003cv08627/44134. Filed on August 25, 2010, this legal matter focuses on Bankruptcy Withdrawl under 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference. Judge Arthur Nakazato, James V. Selna is presiding, and no jury trial is requested.
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
MICHAEL F. BURKHART
More Information
BARONET AND CO., INC.
[Case # 10-16965], [Filed: September 09, 2010]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
IMPERIAL CREDIT INDUSTRIES INC. EDWARD M. WOLKOWITZ
More Information
as Trustee for Imperial Credit Industries
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, in its capacity as receiver for Southern Pacific Bank, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, in its corporate capacity
[Case # 10-56376], [Filed: September 01, 2010]
[ Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ in its corporate capacity
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
CHET DUFFYMICHAEL SIEGEL and ROBERT BRUCE, ALBERT GABRIEL and ROSE BYERS
[Case # 10-3948], [Filed: September 30, 2010]
[ Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ MICHAEL SIEGEL, ᐅ ROBERT BRUCE, ᐅ ALBERT GABRIEL
California,   October 14, 2010
Case 2:2010cv07704/484767, some of the participants — ᐅ Cabrillo Beach Yacht Club 

Check it out, it's Cabrillo Beach Yacht Club taking on CBS Studios, Inc. Case number case 2:2010cv07704/484767, started on October 14, 2010. It's about Marine, happening with Judge John E. McDermott, Stephen V. Wilson.
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Party 1Party 2
[Case # case 10-3101], [Filed: October 21, 2010]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Rodrigo Perez Pallares
More Information
Ricardo Reis Veiga and Chevron Corporation
More Information
Lago Agrio Plaintiffs
[Case # 10-4405], [Filed: October 28, 2010]
[ STATUTES-Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ Lago Agrio Plaintiffs
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
Michael O'LearyMichael S Pascazi
[Case # 10-4487], [Filed: November 01, 2010]
[ STATUTES-Bkrup Appeals 801§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ Michael S Pascazi
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
CHET DUFFYMICHAEL SIEGEL and ROBERT BRUCE, ALBERT GABRIEL and ROSE BYERS
[Case # 10-4018], [Filed: October 12, 2010]
[ Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ MICHAEL SIEGEL, ᐅ ROBERT BRUCE, ᐅ ALBERT GABRIEL
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
EL VEASTA LAMPLEYMORGAN STANLEY, WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO. and HOMEQ
[Case # 10-56861], [Filed: December 01, 2010]
[ Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ MORGAN STANLEY
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
EL VEASTA LAMPLEYMORGAN STANLEY, WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO. and HOMEQ
[Case # 10-56862], [Filed: December 01, 2010]
[ Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ MORGAN STANLEY
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF LEMINGTON HOME FOR THE AGEDARTHUR BALDWIN
[Case # 10-4456], [Filed: November 29, 2010]
[ Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ ARTHUR BALDWIN


Court records are widely used for a multitude of purposes, but whatever your specific reason, their main objective is to provide information.

To put it simply, court records provide data in black and white. Ask a Lawyer

Leave a Comment