Case Search California (CA)

This search feature provides access to information.

Instant Court Records Search
Criminal Court Records, Civil Court Records, Traffic Court Records
Federal, State, County & Municipal Sources and Much More!

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ismael Perez
More Information
J. Tilton
[Case # 2008cv04328/419642], [Filed: July 01, 2008]
[ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) ⚖ ]
[Judge: Klausner, Segal]
ᐅ J. Tilton
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
MICHAEL IKELIONWU
More Information
JOHN NASH and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 08-4396], [Filed: November 06, 2008]
[ Prisoner-Civil Rights§ ⚖ ]

Petitioner   versus   Respondent
ISMAEL VAZQUEZ VARGAS and EVA OCHOAERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
[Case # 08-74553], [Filed: November 04, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ Attorney General
PlaintiffPetitioner   versus   DefendantRespondent
PHILIP J. BERG ESQUIREBARACK OBAMA, also known as BARRY SOETORO also known as BARRY OBAMA also known as BARACK DUNHAM also known as BARRY DUNHAM, DEMOCRATIC NATL COMM and FED ELECTION COMM
[Case # 08-4443], [Filed: November 06, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ BARACK OBAMA, ᐅ also known as BARRY SOETORO also known as BARRY OBAMA also known as BARACK DUNHAM also known as BARRY DUNHAM
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
ILAN ZADOK GOLANERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
[Case # 08-72830], [Filed: July 01, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ Attorney General
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
Ignacio Gonzales
More Information
California Board of Parole Hearings
[Case # 2008cv01680/431335], [Filed: November 19, 2008]
[ Habeas Corpus (General)§28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) ⚖ ]
[Judge: Nakazato, Otero]
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: JASPER WASHINGTON
More Information
RANDALL E. BRITTON, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
[Case # 08-4558], [Filed: November 19, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ RANDALL E. BRITTON
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: HORACE BREWINGTON
More Information
DA PHILADELPHIA
[Case # 08-4538], [Filed: November 19, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
INDIAN BRAND FARMS
More Information
COLUMBIA FRUIT FARMS
More Information
COLUMBIA CRANBERRY
More Information
R&S FRANCESCHINI FARMS
More Information
JOYCE CAPPUCCIO
More Information
JOSEPH E. MARTINELLI
More Information
GREGORY A. CLARK and ANTHONY MELORA
More Information
NOVARTIS CROP PROTECTION INC.
[Case # 08-4484], [Filed: November 13, 2008]
[ Other Contract Actions§ ⚖ ]

Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
I-VU USA a Delaware registered companyBROADBAND LEARNING, a Utah registered company
[Case # 08-4211], [Filed: November 13, 2008]
[ Other Contract Actions§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ BROADBAND LEARNING
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
IRENE ENGLE
More Information
ISMAEL AHMED, in his official Capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Human Services, OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN and OAKLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, Family Division
[Case # 08-2470], [Filed: November 13, 2008]
[ Constitutional - State Statute§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ ISMAEL AHMED, ᐅ Family Division
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: SHERMAN GALLOWAY
More Information
DAVID MCKUNE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
[Case # 08-3314], [Filed: November 12, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ DAVID MCKUNE
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: CHATUR CORPORATION and CHAMPAK PATEL
More Information
THIRTY EIGHT STREET, INC. and VANTAGE HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC.
[Case # 08-4568], [Filed: November 14, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ THIRTY EIGHT STREET
California,   November 14, 2008
Case 2:2008cv07545/430947, some of the participants — ᐅ Alejandro J. Valencia 

In the US District Court for the Central District of California, the case 2:2008cv07545/430947 involves Integrated Sports Media, Inc. and Alejandro J. Valencia. Filed on November 14, 2008, this case pertains to Cable/Satellite TV under 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984. Presiding over this matter is Judge Segal, Wu. There is no demand for a jury trial.
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 150 AFL-CIONATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, HANSON MATERIAL SERVICE CORPORATION
[Case # 08-3908], [Filed: November 14, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
IAN M. BLACK an individual
More Information
COLASKA INC, doing business as Secon, an Alaskan corporation
[Case # 08-35947], [Filed: November 17, 2008]
[ Fair Labor Standards Act§ ⚖ ]

Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
In re: RICHARD KELLY
More Information
MELVIN S. LOCKETT, ATTY GEN PA and DA ALGHNY
[Case # 08-4354], [Filed: October 31, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ MELVIN S. LOCKETT
California,   November 18, 2008
Case 2:2008cv07587/431234, some of the participants — ᐅ Sonora Store 

The legal proceedings in case 2:2008cv07587/431234 at US District Court for the Central District of California involve International Intellectual Management Corporation and Star Rugs Int'l, Sung's Home Collection, Multi Import, Inc., Lee Yunn Enterprises, Inc. (U.S.A.), American Jianei Textile, Denise's Home, L.A. Bazaar, L.A. Home Fashion, Inc., Does, Sharifco Blanket, Inc. and Sonora Store. Filed on November 18, 2008, this case focuses on Patent based on 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement. Judge Eick, Gutierrez is presiding, and it's notable that the Plaintiff has requested a jury trial.
Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
In re: JOHNNY LOPEZ
More Information
ATTY GEN DE
[Case # 08-4557], [Filed: November 18, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

Plaintiff   versus   Defendant
IRVIN H. CATLETT
More Information
JR.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[Case # 08-2274], [Filed: November 18, 2008]
[ Tax Suits§ ⚖ ]

California,   November 18, 2008
Case 2:2008cv07588/431200, some of the participants — ᐅ Deborah Ann Kramer King, ᐅ Stephen D. King 

At the US District Court for the Central District of California, case 2:2008cv07588/431200 involves Irell & Manella LLP bringing a case against Prestige Ocean Properties, LLC, KGMAC, LLC, Deborah Ann Kramer King and Stephen D. King. Filed on November 18, 2008, this case addresses issues related to Contract: Other based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The case is presided over by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank, with Referring Judge Andrew J Wistrich also involved. It's essential to note that Defendant has demanded a jury for this case.
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
In re: ANTHONY HARPER
More Information
DONALD VAUGHN, ATTY GEN PA and DA PHILADELPHIA
[Case # 08-4595], [Filed: November 21, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ DONALD VAUGHN
Petitioner   versus   Respondent
IRMA YOLANDA LEAL-BARRAZA AKA Irma Yolanda Leal AKA Irma Yolanda BarrazaMICHAEL B. MUKASEY and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
[Case # 08-9574], [Filed: November 18, 2008]
[ Other§ ⚖ ]

ᐅ MICHAEL B. MUKASEY
California,   November 25, 2008
Case 3:2008cv02189/284528, some of the participants — ᐅ Ida Bleich, ᐅ Basil Abdulahad, ᐅ Does - 

In the US District Court for the Southern District of California case 3:2008cv02189/284528, Ida Bleich files a suit against El Cajon Police Officer D. Ehlers, Basil Abdulahad and Does 1-20. The filing date was November 25, 2008, and this case concerns Plaintiff under Federal Question. Presiding over the case is Judge Marilyn L. Huff, Leo S. Papas. The 42:1983 Civil Rights Act has requested a jury trial.
California,   November 25, 2008
Case 2:2008cv06827/428502, some of the participants — ᐅ Irina Barnes, ᐅ Peter Fong, ᐅ Scott Burnside, ᐅ Doe Municipal Entities, ᐅ Captain Dean Hartsorn, ᐅ Robert Jones, ᐅ John Kabala 

At the US District Court for the Central District of California, the legal case 2:2008cv06827/428502 entails Irina Barnes and Peter Fong and Scott Burnside, Chrisp, DOES, Doe Municipal Entities, Captain Dean Hartsorn, Johnson, Robert Jones, John Kabala, The Alhambra Fire & Police Department, The City of Alhambra, The City of Montebello, The City of Monterey Park, The City of South Pasadena. The filing date is November 25, 2008, and this case deals with Civil Rights: Other as per 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act. Judge Percy Anderson, Carolyn Turchin is presiding over this matter, and no jury trial is demanded.


Court records are widely used for a multitude of purposes, but whatever your specific reason, their main objective is to provide information. To put it simply, court records provide data in black and white. Ask a Lawyer.

Leave a Comment